Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.10.0 release candidate 4

2013-08-02 Thread ayo
+1 Win 8, AFSDK 4.10.0 there is still the the Win 8 FB7 layout attribute issue. aYo www.ayobinitie.com mrbinitie.blogspot.com From: Alex Harui Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎2‎ ‎August‎ ‎2013 ‎18‎:‎25 To: dev@flex.apache.org +1 Src kit build passed. Signature match on src tar and zip kit Rat passed on

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.10.0 release candidate 4

2013-08-02 Thread ayo
Will test on Linux Mint FDT5 later today aYo www.ayobinitie.com mrbinitie.blogspot.com From: Alex Harui Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎2‎ ‎August‎ ‎2013 ‎18‎:‎25 To: dev@flex.apache.org +1 Src kit build passed. Signature match on src tar and zip kit Rat passed on src zip kit Mustella passed on Mac with 11

RE: [jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33645) Spark Datagrid : Record Select and Column Sort issue

2013-08-02 Thread Sugan Naicker
Hi Justin, For Samsung Note, I used PPI=285 : SDK 4.9.1 -> Datagrid works perfectly with PPI=285 SDK 4.10.0 -> Datagrid Issues (only allows selection of 1st half of records and column click sort problems) Work-around : Changed PPI to 170 and datagrid works 100% Link to Devic

RE: FlexUnit release

2013-08-02 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>Sorry, I wasn't clear. I think Apache Flex should make a release of FlexUnit, >but it doesn't have to be a "parity" release. I don't know what pull requests >are outstanding, so I trust your >judgement on whether anything outstanding >might scare folks away. If not, I don't see why the first

Re: [jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33645) Spark Datagrid : Record Select and Column Sort issue

2013-08-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > So the issue is a PPI issue that is impacting the datagrid. In SDK 4.9.1 the > original PPI setting works 100%. What was the PPI setting that caused the issue? It may be a bug with the new 480dpi skins/code. Justin

Re: FlexUnit release

2013-08-02 Thread Alex Harui
On 8/2/13 11:43 AM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net" wrote: >>I think folks may trust us by now, so it may not be worth making a >>parity release. > >Alex, > >The only counter point I offer is that, if we had a parity release with >the Apache name (or even a release that integrated some of the ex

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 4 issues or problems here!

2013-08-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > If I recall correctly, it's version 10.1 Close the minimum is 10.2. This is in the README. The 4.10 SDK wont compile with 10.1 but it may be possible to get it working on 10.1 with a little work. Thanks. Justin

RE: FlexUnit release

2013-08-02 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>I think folks may trust us by now, so it may not be worth making a parity >release. Alex, The only counter point I offer is that, if we had a parity release with the Apache name (or even a release that integrated some of the existing pull requests) people might begin associating the project w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.6 - RC3

2013-08-02 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 Looks fine to me. On Jul 31, 2013 4:27 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote: > +1 > > OS: Win7 64bit > Air client: 3.8 > Flex SDK: 4.10 (FP 11.8) > > built source (from given link) > Installed binaries (from given link) > Setup flex with Air 3.8 and FP 11.8 > > > > One minor graphical thing. when buildi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.10.0 release candidate 4

2013-08-02 Thread Alex Harui
+1 Src kit build passed. Signature match on src tar and zip kit Rat passed on src zip kit Mustella passed on Mac with 11.1 and Win7 with 11.7 Notice files look fine Thanks Justin! -Alex On 8/1/13 3:57 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote: >+1 > >OS: Win7 64bit >Flex SDK: 4.10 >FP: 11.8 > >Successfully buil

Re: FlexUnit release

2013-08-02 Thread Alex Harui
IMO, we did an SDK parity release because: 1) we wanted to assure customers that we weren't going to break anything or do anything crazy wild with the code 2) there were lots of pieces that needed integration (TLF, MXMLC, OSMF, BlazeDS, etc) 3) we wanted to make sure we had everything we needed fro

Re: BlazeDS Software Grant was sent to Apache today.

2013-08-02 Thread Alex Harui
OK. I've requested a flex-blazeds repo in this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6630 -Alex On 8/2/13 9:07 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Great Alex, > >it's great to see BlazeDS coming under the umbrella. For me SVN history is >not needed. > >Best, > >Carlos > >2013/8/2 Alex Har

Re: Apache Flex SDK installer privilege escallation as needed

2013-08-02 Thread Alex Harui
Sounds like a good suggestions. Please file an enhancement request in JIRA at issues.apache.org. Do you have time to actually write the challenge and test it yourself? Thanks -Alex On 8/2/13 9:06 AM, "Chris Martin" wrote: >Heyo, > >I had a thought today while working with the installer. When

Re: BlazeDS Software Grant was sent to Apache today.

2013-08-02 Thread Carlos Rovira
Great Alex, it's great to see BlazeDS coming under the umbrella. For me SVN history is not needed. Best, Carlos 2013/8/2 Alex Harui > Once the grant is recorded, we'll start in on moving the code over. I > think we're just going to take it without SVN history. Extracting SVN > history from

Apache Flex SDK installer privilege escallation as needed

2013-08-02 Thread Chris Martin
Heyo, I had a thought today while working with the installer. When I run the SDK installer i always get as far as installing the SDK and then realized I forgot to start the installer with administrator privileges. I need admin privileges, because I install my sdks into the program files director

RE: FlexUnit release

2013-08-02 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>There are still a few things to do. I'd say we need decide if we just create a >parity release (like >sdk 4.8 release) or already add some of the pull >requests: One of the open topics is the tutorials. While eventually it would be great to get everything in place, if you were to exclude the l

RE: Wiki Re-organizing

2013-08-02 Thread Scott Guthmann
>I tried to group most of the Wiki pages together in some organized way. >Making it less random information thrown out on the top level. I did not >change any of the page titles so all the Links to them will still >work. Feel >free to correct any naming or placement. > >-Mark Thank you, Mark!

RE: [jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33645) Spark Datagrid : Record Select and Column Sort issue

2013-08-02 Thread Sugan Naicker
Hi Alex, >> ? I noticed some of the UI was overlaying the DataGrid Samsung "Note" was a custom device that I added to the Flash Builder device list, it's got a smaller screen, switching to Samsung galaxy caused the UI overlay. Solution : --- After seeing your comment above I realized

Wiki Re-organizing

2013-08-02 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
I tried to group most of the Wiki pages together in some organized way. Making it less random information thrown out on the top level. I did not change any of the page titles so all the Links to them will still work. Feel free to correct any naming or placement. -Mark

RE: [REQUEST] A tutorial on how to fix bugs for the Flex SDK

2013-08-02 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
I've tossed in the rough structure [1]. I'm going to move any related pages under the structure for now. This should allow different people to start adding content when they get time to. On a side note, I think we may need to clean up the existing pages. It's sort of random what's in there n

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 4 issues or problems here!

2013-08-02 Thread Erik de Bruin
If I recall correctly, it's version 10.1 EdB On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jagan Langa Sami Durai wrote: > Hi, > > correct me if my understanding is wrong. Developer may prefer any latest > flash player while compiling and releasing. But my question is. what is the > minimum flash player ve

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 4 issues or problems here!

2013-08-02 Thread Jagan Langa Sami Durai
Hi, correct me if my understanding is wrong. Developer may prefer any latest flash player while compiling and releasing. But my question is. what is the minimum flash player version supported by 4.10.0 sdk? * Regards, S. Jagan Langa* *|* *Team Lead* *Sybrant Technologies Pvt Ltd* *--

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 4 issues or problems here!

2013-08-02 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Aug 2, 2013 2:24 AM, "Jagan Langa Sami Durai" wrote: > > hi > > I have installed the rc4 sdk with the latest sdk installer. I noticed that, > by default, min. player version is marked as 11.8 in the flex-config.xml. > is it supposed to point 11.8 or its an error? > > > >11.8 > This w

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 4 issues or problems here!

2013-08-02 Thread Jagan Langa Sami Durai
hi I have installed the rc4 sdk with the latest sdk installer. I noticed that, by default, min. player version is marked as 11.8 in the flex-config.xml. is it supposed to point 11.8 or its an error? 11.8 * Regards, S. Jagan Langa* *|* *Team Lead* *Sybrant Technologies Pvt Ltd* *