Wow, you updated a lot of tickets.
>Quite a few from a casual glance look easy to fix and a lesser (but
>significant) number easy to fix.
I think you meant "Quite a few from a casual glance look easy to *test* and a
lesser (but significant) number easy to fix."
-Message d'origine-
De :
Hi,
> I think you meant "Quite a few from a casual glance look easy to *test* and a
> lesser (but significant) number easy to fix."
Yep that's what I meant. There's certainly enough there to keep people busy.
Thanks,
Justin
On 15/12/2013 15:51, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
In which case, would it make sense that the installer won't be based solely on
Adobe technology?
Maurice
Ahh, interesting, because I was starting to work on an PPA for Ubuntu
users that would correctly install AIR and it's dependencies and then
the
>AIR isn't required for *using* the SDK one it is built, right ?
Do you mean AIR runtime, or AIR SDK ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com]
Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 11:38
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Installer Revisited
On 15/12/20
On 16/12/2013 10:44, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
AIR isn't required for*using* the SDK one it is built, right ?
Do you mean AIR runtime, or AIR SDK ?
Maurice
AIR the runtime.
Assuming I don't target an AIR application, then I suppose the AIR SDK
is required, but this is installed by the installe
Looking good so far.
" the merged text for Desktop / Mobile is too long, IMO. Now the boxes seem
even more unbalanced."
Could try to increase the height to fill space. Meaning the box borders would
be the same height but the contents variable.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mauri
>Could try to increase the height to fill space. Meaning the box borders would
>be the same height but the contents variable.
Yes, good idea.
I tried already adding height="100%" but didn't work.
I will look for another way of doing it.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Kessler CTR M
Hi,
Here's a curious one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33974
From what I can see there's a couple of bugs in there.
The most obvious one being:
public function get playheadTime():Number
{
-return _playheadTime + startDelay;
+return _playheadTime;
}
A
Hi,
> AIR isn't required for *using* the SDK one it is built, right ?
Correct you can build and install an SDK without using the installer - take a
look at the scripts in the ide directory.
Thanks,
Justin
>Assuming I don't target an AIR application, then I suppose the AIR SDK is
>required, but this is installed by the installer.
AFAIU, that's correct
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com]
Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 11:49
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Yes. That works. But for some reason none of the tlf_internal functions are
recognized… Argh!
On Dec 15, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> In FB, if you are set up as a library project, does the project explorer
> show the source files in the tree?
>
> On 12/15/13 5:15 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
Justin, I couldn't find the code you mention above.
In which class is it ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 12:55
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Interesting animation bug
Hi,
Here's a curious one:
https:
Hi,
> Justin, I couldn't find the code you mention above.
spark/effects/Animation.as in the spark project.
Thanks,
Justin
Ok thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 13:12
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Interesting animation bug
Hi,
> Justin, I couldn't find the code you mention above.
spark/effects/Animation.as in the spark proje
>as duration already included startDelay.
I did a simple test:
And the total duration of the animation is 5000+5000;
So it seems that duration does not include startDelay.
Is that correct?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : lund
On 16/12/2013 11:55, Justin Mclean wrote:
numRepeats += (_playheadTime - duration) / (duration + repeatDelay);
See the original playheadTime above. Anyone see something I've missed or are
the current tests possibly testing current incorrect behaviour?
Well, this is an interesting one, because
Maurice,
We also develop in flex.
You can add metacerta.com as an example in the showcase... It is a Finance
Management system for businesses in Brazil I can also send you some
screenshots.
Atenciosamente,
[image: MetaCerta - você pronto para gerir] [image: Rafael Santos -
CEO] [image:
www
Thanks Rafael,
The submission procedure (not published yet) is the following:
- create a "Task" ticket on https://issues.apache.org/jira, under the Component
"Showcase",
- include a title and brief description (5 lines max). More detailed
information can be in your web site.
- indicate the aut
Hi Alex,
sorry for the late response.
I didn't mean to use the same code base for the SWF and the HTML
components, but only the same programming language: ActionScript!
Of course you would still have to learn different low-level APIs
(DisplayList versus browser DOM/BOM), but at least you could use
Hi Chris,
a few month ago, I tried out Nashorn to achieve a fast pure-Java RequireJS
build process. RequireJS' "optimizer" r.js is written in JavaScript and
runs in Node.js and Rhino. Unfortunately, in Rhino, it is about ten times
slower than in Node.js. So when I heard that Nashorn is to be much
Actually, there is already "fancybox" included which is another LightBox for
jQuery.
I will use that one.
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 05:23
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex showcase
Unless there is something res
Why shouldn't playheadtime include the startdelay?
-Alex
On 12/16/13 3:55 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Here's a curious one:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33974
>
>From what I can see there's a couple of bugs in there.
>
>The most obvious one being:
> public function get
I honestly don't use the code completion that much so I don't know how it
usually works. Do mx_internal functions get listed for Flex classes?
Even if they have @private asdoc?
-Alex
On 12/16/13 4:07 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Yes. That works. But for some reason none of the tlf_internal functions
>a
Interesting. But that would require a SWC that stubs the browser APIs?
On 12/16/13 6:27 AM, "Frank Wienberg" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>sorry for the late response.
>I didn't mean to use the same code base for the SWF and the HTML
>components, but only the same programming language: ActionScript!
>Of
That's interesting.
On Mac, folks are given a dmg file that essentially installs the installer
and I don't believe it requires that AIR is already installed. Or am I
wrong about that?
On Linux, you're saying the package we create still requires a separate
install of AIR?
I'm not a huge fan of
You might want to use min-height.
For all those boxes.
Van: Maurice Amsellem
Verzonden: maandag 16 december 2013 12:32
Aan: dev@flex.apache.org
Onderwerp: RE: Flex showcase
>Could try to increase the height to fill space. Meaning the box borders would
>b
Yes, as I understand it, it does. So it would really be inverse of
what we're doing. We're stubbing the JS to 'fit' AS. Frank suggests we
stub AS to 'fit' the HTML/DOM etc. In his approach the only language
anyone - component and application developers alike - would have to
write in would be AS.
B
Thanks for the hint
-Message d'origine-
De : Swen van Zanten [mailto:i...@hdsign.nl]
Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 18:44
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Flex showcase
You might want to use min-height.
For all those boxes.
Van: Maurice Amsell
" I heard it isn't on WinXP. Do we need to support that?"
XP support ends April 8th 2014 [1]. I would say not to support it.
[1] http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/end-support-help
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, December 16,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> That's interesting.
>
> On Mac, folks are given a dmg file that essentially installs the installer
> and I don't believe it requires that AIR is already installed. Or am I
> wrong about that?
>
Yes, no need for an AIR install. The installer
Please vote to approve Apache Flex PixelBender Package version 1.0.0 to be
released.
As a reminder, the PixelBender package is a subset of the flex-sdk repo
containing the PixelBender source files and a build script to compile them
into PixelBender PBJ files. This package will probably not be use
Please use this thread for discussion.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/16/13 11:14 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>On Linux, we can probably assume that Ant is already installed, or just a
>'yum install' away from being available. That way, they can just use the
>ant script just as well.
Interesting. Tom, do you agree that Ant would be sufficient for a
Hi,
> Why shouldn't playheadtime include the startdelay?
Because then the values returned are something like this:
Elapsed Time/playheadTime
0/200
27/200
65/200
109/200
148/200
178/200
232/232
264/264
It also gives different results to anything that extends AnimateTransform (eg
Scale), which w
>I don't think we can expect Java to be installed on our end user machines.
On end-users machines, no.
But I would expect the Installer / SDK to be installed by developers, not
"end-users".
Having Java installed on a developer machine is almost a requirement nowadays,
whatever language you are w
It is a bit scary since the documentation took the time to mention that
playheadTime includes startDelay. I don't know this code at all, but it
makes me think that there is a reason for it.
On 12/16/13 1:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Why shouldn't playheadtime include the startdelay?
Do you guys know the breakdown of which OS's are downloading? I'd bet there
are more XP's out there than linux. Though maybe not. I am still using an
XP...though I have a win 7 as well, just have to finish setting it up.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kes
Hi,
> It is a bit scary since the documentation took the time to mention that
> playheadTime includes startDelay.
Yes it should include the time from 0 up to and including startDelay, but it
shouldn't be adding the full value of startDelay to it before it has happened.
On a time line you have in
In the bug, the user seems to want to see time increasing while time <
startDelay. Is that what you think should happen too, or should it be 0 or
NaN? If it should just increase, I don't understand the point of
including startDelay.
On 12/16/13 2:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> It is a
Hi,
> Do you guys know the breakdown of which OS's are downloading?
Via the installer it's 74% window, 25% OSX and 1% linux. Via other mean we
don't know ie compiling the source or using the binaries and then running the
ide scripts. I usually use the IDE scripts.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> In the bug, the user seems to want to see time increasing while time <
> startDelay.
More about having it consistent between the two types of animation, notice that
both has a startDelay of 200 but return different values in that time interval.
> Is that what you think should happen too, o
Hi,
The stats of which versions of windows use the installer is unclear. We did
have one person use the installer to install 4.11 on Windows NT. Wonder how
that worked out for them?
Justin
Do you know why Scale doesn't display NaN? I didn't see any code setting
_playheadTime to zero, but I certainly could have missed it.
I think you're saying that since _playheadTime is continuously increasing
even when waiting for startDelay, that there is no need to factor
startDelay into the get
Hi,
> Do you know why Scale doesn't display NaN?
No.
> I didn't see any code setting _playheadTime to zero, but I certainly could
> have missed it.
Not sure either.
> I think you're saying that since _playheadTime is continuously increasing
> even when waiting for startDelay, that there is no n
Update status:
- set feature box min-height to 370px in home page
- Flex Showcase updated with all the applications submitted so far , that had
enough information:
bCommunities, Goal Manager, My Dojo, Traffic Live, VeraType.
Online Designer Tool pending info.
- Added lightbox feature fo
Hi,
Have the releases been signed with a correct key?
Asking as [1] says this "It is recommended that your Apache email address is
used as the primary User-ID for the code signing key". The artefacts are signed
by aha...@adobe.com key F8502A44 which is obviously not an Apache email
address.
Hi,
Forgot to say that you can verify the signature (using the KEYS file) with and
the MD5 hashes are correct.
For example:
gpg: Signature made Fri 13 Dec 11:55:17 2013 EST using RSA key ID F8502A44
gpg: Good signature from "aharui "
Thanks,
Justin
On 12/16/13 3:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Do you know why Scale doesn't display NaN?
>No.
>
>> I didn't see any code setting _playheadTime to zero, but I certainly
>>could have missed it.
>Not sure either.
Maybe worth further investigation?
>
>> I think you're saying that since _pla
On 12/16/13 7:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Have the releases been signed with a correct key?
Interesting. I didn't notice that, but yeah, F8Š is a sub key. Do you
know the steps I need to take to fix all of this? I've spent the past
hour trying to figure out what to do. Why did sig
Hi,
> Interesting. I didn't notice that, but yeah, F8Š is a sub key. Do you
> know the steps I need to take to fix all of this?
At a guess:
gpg --default-key C9383D43
> How do I update the KEYS file?
To change you email address? I think you can add extra address but not modify
an existing one
Hi,
> Maybe worth further investigation?
In one case start method is called right away, in the other only after the
startDelay has passed. Looks like startDelay isn't passed down in the first
case, before start being called it will return NaN.
Not 100% sure but looks like there an error in Effe
Hi,
> In one case start method is called right away, in the other only after the
> startDelay has passed.
But then I guess the question is when should start be called at time zero or
after start delay?
Justin
On 12/16/13 9:56 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Interesting. I didn't notice that, but yeah, F8Š is a sub key. Do you
>> know the steps I need to take to fix all of this?
>At a guess:
>gpg --default-key C9383D43
Didn't seem to help
>
>
>> How do I update the KEYS file?
>To change you e
On 12/16/13 10:08 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> In one case start method is called right away, in the other only after
>>the startDelay has passed.
>But then I guess the question is when should start be called at time zero
>or after start delay?
IMO, start delay should delay the start of
54 matches
Mail list logo
