Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex Pixel Bender Package 1.0.0 - RC4

2014-01-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding PGP keys checks out and MD5 checksums are good Source package compiles fine. Ant targets work Tested on OSX READ, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE all good One minor issue which I think we can ignore is that in the NOTICE file the year is 2013 not 2014, and I think it should ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex Pixel Bender Package 1.0.0 - RC4

2014-01-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Changing my vote to +1 (Binding) PGP key checks out MD5 checksum is good Source package compiles fine. Tested on Windows 7 + Cygwin Thanks, Om P.S. Please update the KEYS file at http://www.apache.org/dist/flex/KEYSbefore the release is pushed out to public. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Al

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex PixelBender Package 1.0.0 (RC4)

2014-01-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The signatures are fine as far as I can see - other than not being in the web of trust as as the files came from a trusted location that's OK. This is what I get: justinmclean$ gpg --verify apache-flex-sdk-pixel-bender-1.0.0-src.zip.asc gpg: Signature made Tue 7 Jan 05:53:19 2014 EST using

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex Pixel Bender Package 1.0.0 - RC4

2014-01-07 Thread Alex Harui
That key got trashed so I created a new one. The latest key is in KEYS file here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/pixelbender/ -Alex On 1/7/14 5:12 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >-1 (Binding) > >I am not able to verify the pgp signature. This is the error message I am >getting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex Pixel Bender Package 1.0.0 - RC4

2014-01-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
-1 (Binding) I am not able to verify the pgp signature. This is the error message I am getting: C:\temp>gpg --verify apache-flex-sdk-pixel-bender-1.0.0-src.zip.asc gpg: Signature made 01/06/14 10:53:19 Pacific Standard Time using RSA key ID DA9 CCFF2 gpg: Can't check signature: No public key I j

Re: Mustella broken - Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33836 lazy loading of resource files give performance improvement (esp mobile)

2014-01-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > It looks like Mustella tests are broken as a result of this change. Here > is the RTE. Can you please take a look at it? Can do, I'm on a plane/traveling all day but will get to it in the next couple of days. Thanks, Justin

Mustella broken - Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33836 lazy loading of resource files give performance improvement (esp mobile)

2014-01-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Justin, It looks like Mustella tests are broken as a result of this change. Here is the RTE. Can you please take a look at it? This is the current state of the Mustella run[1] Note that Mustella is stuck on this test. Thanks, Om [1] http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/640

Re: New Flex MaskedTextInput Spark Component

2014-01-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, I rewrite the MaskedTextInput component to support various important concepts: * get/set data vía "text" property (remove "rawText" property). "get" text remove separators and "set" text format the string to display in the component. I think this the most important improvement. * Support for

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex PixelBender Package 1.0.0 (RC4)

2014-01-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, For people voting +1, it would be nice to know what platform you were testing it on, if you compiled it, verified the signatures etc rather than just a +1 with no info. Thanks, Justin

RE: Building Class Explorer in Flex

2014-01-07 Thread Martin, Brad
If you use an XmlListCollection, it will be able to display data hierarchically automatically. Else your domain model objects should implement the hierarchical data interface, a data grid accepts that interface as well. -Original Message- From: Oleg Konovalov [mailto:oleg...@gmail.com

Re: Mustella test - weird behavior

2014-01-07 Thread Alex Harui
Some changes were made to ResourceManagerImpl, so it could be a true failure. On 1/7/14 11:10 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Mustella just crashed again, on: > >TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null >object reference. >at >mx.resources::ResourceManagerImpl/findResour

Re: Mustella test - weird behavior

2014-01-07 Thread Erik de Bruin
Mustella just crashed again, on: TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference. at mx.resources::ResourceManagerImpl/findResourceBundleWithResource()[C:\jenkins_slave\workspace\flex-sdk_mustella\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\resources\ResourceManager

Re: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread João Fernandes
Thanks Alex On 7 January 2014 17:15, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 1/7/14 8:34 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: > > >On 07/01/2014 16:30, João Fernandes wrote: > >> So we don't fix bugs just because it's old code > >Don't mistake my view for the official project stance on it. > Yes, this is definitely

Building Class Explorer in Flex

2014-01-07 Thread Oleg Konovalov
Hi, I am trying to build Class (Object Model) Explorer in Flex, so it would show user Classes within Classes and allow View/Add/Edit/Delete them. This is not Flex classes, but kind of ORM system for user data. So I receive user data as from DB with a row like: Path (class4.class3.class2) - not lik

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex Pixel Bender Package 1.0.0 - RC4

2014-01-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
+1 2014/1/7 aYo ~ > +1 I'm in support > > aYo > mrbinitie.blogspot.com > ayobinitie.com > On 7 Jan 2014 16:28, "Peter Ent" wrote: > > > +1 This seems like a logical thing to do, especially for Linux. > > > > Peter Ent > > Adobe Systems > > > > On 1/6/14 2:11 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > >P

Re: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/7/14 8:34 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: >On 07/01/2014 16:30, João Fernandes wrote: >> So we don't fix bugs just because it's old code >Don't mistake my view for the official project stance on it. Yes, this is definitely not the official project stance. Committers can fix whatever they want

Re: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 07/01/2014 16:30, João Fernandes wrote: So we don't fix bugs just because it's old code Don't mistake my view for the official project stance on it. Tom

Re: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread João Fernandes
So we don't fix bugs just because it's old code, this is pretty nonsense to me. How can the project expect to get people committing fixes if they get turned down because it fixes "legacy" components? It's already hard to get people involved and this clearly doesn't make it easier, just my 2 cents.

Re: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 07/01/2014 15:49, João Fernandes wrote: 2) switching from halo to spark forms is not a simple task of find & replace. I understand that, but it seems to me it's a known, almost expected, bug in a set of components we don't recommend people use. As you say, no new projects will hit the bug,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex Pixel Bender Package 1.0.0 - RC4

2014-01-07 Thread aYo ~
+1 I'm in support aYo mrbinitie.blogspot.com ayobinitie.com On 7 Jan 2014 16:28, "Peter Ent" wrote: > +1 This seems like a logical thing to do, especially for Linux. > > Peter Ent > Adobe Systems > > On 1/6/14 2:11 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >Please vote to approve Apache Flex PixelBender Pack

Re: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread João Fernandes
yea, but they should get fixed if it has been reported, reproduced and if there is a fix for it, no? 1) not every project is a new project where we can start only using spark components 2) switching from halo to spark forms is not a simple task of find & replace. On 7 January 2014 14:37, Kessler

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex PixelBender Package 1.0.0 (RC4)

2014-01-07 Thread Erik de Bruin
I'm really sorry, but I currently don't have the cycles to properly test this, so I want vote I'm afraid :-( EdB On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Please use this thread for discussion. > > The changes in this RC are to: > > 1) try to clean up use of the term Pixel Bender in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex Pixel Bender Package 1.0.0 - RC4

2014-01-07 Thread Peter Ent
+1 This seems like a logical thing to do, especially for Linux. Peter Ent Adobe Systems On 1/6/14 2:11 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Please vote to approve Apache Flex PixelBender Package version 1.0.0 to be >released. > >As a reminder, the PixelBender package is a subset of the flex-sdk repo >conta

RE: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
> Are halo components deprecated by Apache Flex? Well I would say they usually receive less updates than the spark counterparts. -Mark -Original Message- From: João Fernandes [mailto:joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 9:33 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Su

Re: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread João Fernandes
Because there are apps with legacy halo components which can't just switch to spark forms. They have reproduced the problem but deferred the fix. The fix is a simple override to invalidateSize() where the measuredLabelWidth is set to NaN and fix the problem. Are halo components deprecated by Apach

Re: Mustella test - weird behavior

2014-01-07 Thread Alex Harui
Did you ever try the ContinueAfterRuntimeException applet? It is a Windows C++ program whose source is in mustella/as3/src/mustella/ContinueAfterRuntimeException It tries to look for top-level windows with the exception dialog and kill the process. -Alex On 1/7/14 12:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wro

Re: FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread Tom Chiverton
I think Adobe was right here, why not just use Spark Form ? Tom On 07/01/2014 10:01, João Fernandes wrote: I just made a comment on this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-23915 which has a quick fix. This always happen when a formItem is added to a form and includedInLayout is f

FLEX-23915

2014-01-07 Thread João Fernandes
I just made a comment on this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-23915 which has a quick fix. This always happen when a formItem is added to a form and includedInLayout is false. When it's set to true, it will invalidate parent's size, but while running measure()>calculatelabelWidth(

Re: Wiki spam

2014-01-07 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 06/01/2014 17:31, Alex Harui wrote: looks like captcha is enabled so I'm not sure how these got through. People are payed to break CAPTCHA. Tom

Re: Mustella test - weird behavior

2014-01-07 Thread Erik de Bruin
Yes, #639. But the log won't be very helpful as I had to restart to get Jenkins to reset the builds properly. I haven't figured out how to stop a running suite once the player crashes, as it is not started by Jenkins so much as it is by the script. EdB On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Alex Harui