On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 6/17/14 4:49 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, I will see if I can take some time off to do this. If yes, do I
have
permission to use your slides from your past presentations?
Absolutely.
Hi,
so I think I got even nearer to the finishing-line with the Mavenizer
Refactoring. Now I am thinking of how I should produce Maven versions of the
Falcon compiler.
As far as I understood, it's a different jar containing the compiler together
with a hand full of new jars it depends on
Hi,
Meanwhile, using the script or otherwise, can we vote on these packages?
Currently I'm considering if I should the veto the checkin(s) or not.
- This approach was not discussed on the mailing list before being introduced
- I'm not convinced that the script is enough to provide proper PMC
Did you actually look at the script and run it?
It's like a wizard that steps you through the process rather than an
automation of the process itself. It doesn't try take any responsibility
away from the voter, quite the opposite actually: it makes sure the voter
doesn't skip any part of the
Hi,
Did you actually look at the script and run it?
Yes was the first thing I did - hence my concerns.
Justin
Weird. We must be running different scripts.
The one I'm looking at just steps me through the process, asking for my
input when needed to make sure I have done my due diligence. It doesn't
just automatically run through the steps before exiting with: all seems
well, please vote +1.
Nor does it
I too agree, that having a script that GUIDES me through the process sounds
like a really good thing to have.
Currently I personally haven't been voting much, cause I am working on
completely other things and I didn't want to do anything wrong. Having some
guidance here will definitely
Hi,
I resent your threat to block this vote by vetoing the commit of a utility
script.
It is in no way a threat as you put it. With my PMC hat on I have concerns
about this approach and also how it was introduced without review or discussion
or vote. As per our guidelines any PMC member or
As I have clearly stated I have no issue is the script, it is a useful
tool. The danger is that it is used for the sole reason for voting +1 on
releases and that IMO doesn't provide enough PMC oversight. While there a
minimal set of things requited to vote +1 on a release there are a lot of
Hi,
Ok, back into constructive mode: what ISN'T in the script that should be
there to make it comply with your list of a lot of other items?
Off top of my head - there's others.
In general:
- Check KEYS file
- Copyright year in NOTICE is correct
- double check wording in LICENCE and NOTICE is
If the items on that list are what we're REQUIRED to check before voting,
than I agree that the script is a bad thing, but it also means all my votes
up to this point have been invalid.
If they are NOT required, I maintain my position that the script is a very
nice utility that allows me to
Ok ... if this is really all needed, then I will pobably not be able to vote
very much in the near future.
According to this list there's a lot of stuff you have to to. A lot of which at
the moment I don't even know how to do. With the current pace of releases I
would probably stop working on
Hi,
IMO there a big gap between what minimally required for a valid release and
what is a good release. A lot of Apache knowledge is not codified into rules or
even guidelines. Please don't be put off testing a release, you certainly
don't have to do everything I put on that list (and there's
Hi Apache,
I'm DarkStone (real name 周戈), I volunteer to do the Chinese translations for
the Flex SDK Installer, the ANT Installer of Flex SDK and the ANT Installer
of FlexJS.
I have finished all the translation works.
I have already created an issue in JIRA:
Hi,
I'm planning on going and will be submitting some talk proposals ... but in
contrast to the last time, I'll focus on small sub-topics ;-)
Depending on my work situation I'll try and make it. I'm optimistic so I've
just submitted a couple of talks on a Basic introduction to Apache Flex,
Back when our mentors were casting the binding votes that allowed us to do
incubator releases, I believe they ran the minimal steps supported by the
approval script. If it was good enough for Apache then, I believe it is
good enough now. I made these scripts public so that fellow PMC members,
Is there a list anywhere of controls that have already been ported to FlexJS?
From: Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com
To: V Chandrasekhar shake...@yahoo.com; dev@flex.apache.org
dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: Greg Galbreath greg.galbre...@procure.com
Sent: Monday, June
The list is in the SDK itself. The most frequently used package is
org.apache.flex.html. In this package you'll find the components that are
available such as Label, Button, and List.
Peter Ent
Adobe Flex
On 6/18/14 9:41 AM, V Chandrasekhar shake...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote:
Is there a list
Excellent! I will work on integration next.
On 6/18/14 5:59 AM, DarkStone darkst...@163.com wrote:
Hi Apache,
I'm DarkStone (real name 周戈), I volunteer to do the Chinese translations
for
the Flex SDK Installer, the ANT Installer of Flex SDK and the ANT
Installer
of FlexJS.
I have finished all
Hi,
Back when our mentors were casting the binding votes that allowed us to do
incubator releases, I believe they ran the minimal steps supported by the
approval script.
From my experience on the incubator PMC, I'd say that Incubator releases can a
bit more lenient as it is assumed they
I forgot, but you can also look at the FlexJS ASDocs. You can download a
copy here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flex/flexjs/0.0.1/docs/
Or you can look at them on my Apache public site:
http://people.apache.org/~pent/asdoc-flexjs/index.html
Note that the docs on my public site
Hi,
I'm running an experiment where I want to use external JavaScript declarations
so that the compiler won't care that a JavaScript class isn't available at
compile time.
I've created a file called externs.js and into that I've put this declaration:
google.maps.MarkerOptions = function() {};
Hi Darkstone,
I uploaded the files to the server. If you run the installer you should
now see Chinese in the language options. I realized I'd forgotten to ask
what should actually go in the drop down, so if you want to use Chinese
characters in the drop down, just let us know what they should
Hi,
Externs need to be declared to the GCC with a special argument. I don't
think the option you're using passes the file to that argument. I think
FalconJX needs a new option. I'll look at it tomorrow.
Can you maybe file a JIRA so we have a reference?
EdB
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014, Peter
It just occurred to me that from the Maven standpoint, Falcon doesn't even
need to be an overlay, it can just be a standalone thing. We only need
overlays in order to get it to work with an IDE.
So, in theory, if you set up the lib folder correctly (including
dependencies), the only trick is to
On 6/18/14 9:39 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
That said, in future vote threads, I will try to mention that additional
testing is encouraged.
It should be more than encouraged, it should be mandatory!
Now can we get on to voting?
If you agree with the above sure.
Well,
I suggested that Peter try -external-js-lib from looking at the publisher
code. But it is a good question: Peter, if you don't have that file and
param, do you get different results? If you add the param and don't
specify a correct path to a file do you get an error?
-Alex
On 6/18/14 11:41 AM,
I get the same error with or without the parameter.
I don't get an error when I specify an invalid file name. I do get an
error if I misspell the parameter, so external-js-lib seems to be valid,
perhaps just not used.
--peter
On 6/18/14 2:49 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I suggested
Try this file:
https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/blob/master/contrib/externs/goog
le_maps_api_v2.js
If that doesn't work, then we definitely have a bug in the compiler.
-Alex
On 6/18/14 12:11 PM, Peter Ent p...@adobe.com wrote:
I get the same error with or without the parameter.
I
Hmm,
On the off-chance that the -external-js-lib parameter worked with a URL, I
supplied with the one below. No luck of course, but I did get an error
saying that the file could not be read. So I downloaded the .js and ran it
again.
I got the same error about not being able to find
I made a as3 project last now, it likes TourDeFlex, but have more freedom，do
a job like partner of developer.Instances from Web or myself, please
downloadASProjectLib，modify the instance on local，welcome to share your
instances，please contact to lxto...@gmail.com.
Github:
31 matches
Mail list logo
