On 6/24/14 10:40 PM, DarkStone darkst...@163.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
I just tested Flex SDK Installer 3.1 RC4, finally, I can complete the
installations:
Flex 4.13.0 RC1 + AIR 14 + FP 14 Installation Completed Successfully
FlexJS 0.0.2 RC2 + AIR 14 + FP 14 Installation Completed Successfully
Good
Hi,
It would help me, and maybe others, if you would propose fixes, instead of
just pointing out problems and making the RM guess as to what will satisfy
you.
It about satisfying the requirements as mandated by Apache not me.
The issue looks obvious to me - ie our NOTICE is missing
Hi,
Shoudl the source releae contain enough to make a release?
From the source package and following the instructions in README I'm getting
the release build failed with:
binary-package-tgz:
[tar] Building tar:
Hi Alex,
The COPY LOG in zh_CN is 拷贝日志
The COPY LOG in zh_TW is 拷貝日誌
About the FlexJS installation issue:
If the JRE (Java Runtime Environment) is not installed on Windows, and the Path
environment variable does not contain the JRE's bin directory, installing
FlexJS will stuck, here is the
On 6/24/14 11:17 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
It would help me, and maybe others, if you would propose fixes, instead
of
just pointing out problems and making the RM guess as to what will
satisfy
you.
It about satisfying the requirements as mandated by Apache not
On 6/24/14 11:45 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Shoudl the source releae contain enough to make a release?
Don't think that's a requirement (policy only says 'build' not 'release'),
but I don't have any objection to adding that to the source-package.
-Alex
ContentHolder.fla was approved by mentors.
The other files I will deal with for the next RC.
Thanks for finding those.
-Alex
On 6/24/14 9:27 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Decided to look though the binaries images and the like we have in our
source release.
This image
HI,
The Velocity NOTICE appears to just contain the standard ASF notice, so I
don't believe we have to mention it?
My understanding is yes it needs to be mentioned.
I'm not seeing how the deps of deps section would change that.
It depends on what their NOTICES contain.
Also from [1]: As far
Are you running diff with -w? Bertrand said that was ok. Otherwise, what
actual content is different in a few of these?
I know you are busy, and theoretically I have more time to spend on this
than you, but it would be helpful if you would provide enough detail so I
don't have to guess how to
On 6/25/14 12:41 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
HI,
The Velocity NOTICE appears to just contain the standard ASF notice, so
I
don't believe we have to mention it?
My understanding is yes it needs to be mentioned.
I'm not seeing how the deps of deps section would change
Hi,
Are we looking at the same Velocity NOTICE? My copy just says:
This product includes software developed by The Apache Software
Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
Yes. I can't find anything that say it must be included so lets leave it as it
is.
I find it rather odd that you can't
Hi Alex,
I have tested my production level Flex AIR Mobile and Desktop projects using
Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1 + AIR 14, they are all good, haven't found any compile-time
or runtime issues.
DarkStone
2014-06-25
At 2014-06-24 00:26:44, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
This is the discussion
Hi,
Probably no issue at all - just being thorough.
Do we have permission to use these images - as they are likeness of I assume
real people?
./examples/EffectsExample/src/jproctor.jpg
./examples/EffectsExample/src/twong.jpg
And is this logo OK? It looks made up so probably is.
Hi,
-1 binding - unable to compile
Checked:
- md5 and signatures all good
- LICENSE, NOTICE etc all good
- all source files have correct headers
- no unwanted binaries in source release
- can't compile (see below)
BUILD FAILED
Hi,
+1 binding
Checked:
- signatures and md5 hashes all good
- all LICENSE and NOTICE files good
- all source file headers are Apache
- no binaries in source release
- can compile from source
- tests pass
Consider fixing in next RC/release.
- Update REAME with latest Flash Player versions
-
On 6/25/14 6:33 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
BUILD FAILED
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/FlexJS0.0.2RC2/apache-flex-flexjs-0.0.2-src/
build.xml:274: FALCONJX_HOME must be set to a folder with a lib
sub-folder containing jsc.jar such as the compiler.jx folder in
flex-falcon
Yes, these files were in the latest Adobe donation.
On 6/25/14 6:13 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Probably no issue at all - just being thorough.
Do we have permission to use these images - as they are likeness of I
assume real people?
Hi Justin,
I can't find mention of some items in your vote in the discuss thread.
Can you repeat the info here?
- code in RC1 doesn't match tag apache-flex-sdk-4.13RC1 (RELEASE_NOTES,
Version.as files + others)
What were some of the content diffs?
- compc/mxmlc version incorrect (both report
On 6/25/14 3:44 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
We have a set of files in our repo that end up in the source package.
Feel
free to compare that set against Batik 1.7 which AFAIK, is not bundled
in
the source package.
I think there is a (minor) issue here for instance we have
Hi,
Yes, these files were in the latest Adobe donation.
Sure but did Adobe have permission or license to use them? They also included
in a donation to us playerglobal.swc if I recall :-)
Including people likeness usually requires their express permission (depends on
location - in US there is
Hi,
So, I'm satisfied the gif and png files we bundle are not from the
projects not mentioned in NOTICE and therefore NOTICE is correct.
If you can tell me where they are from I'll be satisfied. It seems unlikely
that the project hand made a flag for every country.
Justin
Thanks for doing this!
Do you have time to upgrade the GCL on the builds machine? I don't have
my windows machine handy and VMWare is painful slow. Or maybe you did it
already, I haven't checked.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 6/25/14 8:38 AM, erikdebr...@apache.org erikdebr...@apache.org
wrote:
Fix tests
On 6/25/14 9:12 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
So, I'm satisfied the gif and png files we bundle are not from the
projects not mentioned in NOTICE and therefore NOTICE is correct.
If you can tell me where they are from I'll be satisfied. It seems
unlikely that the
Hi,
You need to build FalconJX first. That will create the lib dir with proper
contents (dependencies and artefacts).
I thought I had var ant but no jsc.jar was produced. Turns out that you need
to do an ant all. Why isn't this the default target?
Justin
Hi,
Changing my vote to +1 (binding).
Further testing:
- Was able to compile from source
- Tests pass
- Could run data binding example both jS + swf - however swf version of the
example has overlapping text
Minor issues:
- Change ant all target to be the default target in Falcon, less
On it.
EdB
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Thanks for doing this!
Do you have time to upgrade the GCL on the builds machine? I don't have
my windows machine handy and VMWare is painful slow. Or maybe you did it
already, I haven't checked.
Thanks,
I say we try to 'auto-update'. One of the reasons for using CI is to be
alerted to new issues as soon as possible. The GC Compiler and Library are
constantly being developed to keep up with the newest standards, browsers
and JS VMs, and our framework should as well.
EdB
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014
OK. I'll try to find time for that unless you have time.
Let me know,
-Alex
On 6/25/14 10:35 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
I say we try to 'auto-update'. One of the reasons for using CI is to be
alerted to new issues as soon as possible. The GC Compiler and Library are
constantly
Hi guys,
While doing some last tests with the new Mavenizer, I just noticed that I
currently don't know where to download playerglobals resource bundles from.
So I guess you have solved this in the Installer so could you please post how
to construct the url to download the resource bundles?
I have an ant script that does this, so I'm on it.
EdB
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
OK. I'll try to find time for that unless you have time.
Let me know,
-Alex
On 6/25/14 10:35 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
I say we try to
http://download.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/updaters/12/playerglobal14_0.swc
Is that what you're looking for?
EdB
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Christofer Dutz christofer.d...@c-ware.de
wrote:
Hi guys,
While doing some last tests with the new Mavenizer, I just noticed that I
http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml is probably
the best location to look for this. A flash player node looks like this:
versionP id=flash.sdk.version.14.0b version=14.0
displayVersion=14.0.0.125 Beta
server id=flash.sdk.server.14.0bhttp://download.macromedia.com
I think we only download player global.swc. But I could be wrong.
On 6/25/14 10:53 AM, Christofer Dutz christofer.d...@c-ware.de wrote:
Hi guys,
While doing some last tests with the new Mavenizer, I just noticed that I
currently don't know where to download playerglobals resource bundles
from.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I think we only download player global.swc. But I could be wrong.
I haven't seen anything about resource bundles, either.
Thanks,
Om
On 6/25/14 10:53 AM, Christofer Dutz christofer.d...@c-ware.de wrote:
Hi guys,
Actually I currently am able to download the playerglobal.swc without problems.
I am currently talking about the resource bundles located in the flex sdk in
frameworks\locale\{locale}\playerblobal_rb.swc
So where do we get this from?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
Ok ... now that's a surprise.
Having a look at the playerglobal_rb.swc it seemed to only contain a dummy
property. So I removed the playerglobal_rb.swc dependencies from the Flexmojos
build and it seemed to have worked. So I guess the files aren't needed. So what
are they actually for?
Chris
+1
I checked the md5 and signatures.
I read through the LICENSE, NOTICE et al files and they seemed fine.
I built from source, created a distro package, copied that to a clean
directory and ran ant -f installer.xml
I used the final FlexJS SDK to build several examples.
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems
+1
I checked the md5 hash and signatures
I read the LICENSE, NOTICE, et al files and they seem OK to me.
Since I was going to check FlexJS, I needed to build this, too, and it
compiled and tested without errors.
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems
Are we going to list out all the globalplayer.swc or stop at 12 [1] in the
readme file? Should we just reference the [2] flash player download area
if it grows to big?
[1]
http://download.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/updaters/12/playerglobal12_0.swc
[2]
Hi,
I can look at this more in depth later, but are you sure this isn't always
the case with past releases?
I've not checked them all but when I was RM I checked that this was the case
and checked in the version files before creating a tag.
But it more than just the version files here.
Hi,
Are we going to list out all the globalplayer.swc or stop at 12 [1] in the
readme file?
The URLs are not all the same and may change in the future, having links latest
version make it easier for users to get them IMO. People often want URLs for
other purposes eg CI + that Adobe page is
No idea.
On 6/25/14 12:55 PM, Christofer Dutz christofer.d...@c-ware.de wrote:
Ok ... now that's a surprise.
Having a look at the playerglobal_rb.swc it seemed to only contain a
dummy property. So I removed the playerglobal_rb.swc dependencies from
the Flexmojos build and it seemed to have
I'd prefer to not waste time maintaining this list. I'd bet the vast
majority of folks are getting their player global via the installer.
-Alex
On 6/25/14 7:58 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Are we going to list out all the globalplayer.swc or stop at 12 [1] in
the
On 6/25/14 10:26 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
- compc/mxmlc version incorrect (both report 4.12.0)
I asked earlier whether you had FLEX_HOME pointing to 4.12.0. In my
tests, the version number was correct.
Why would FLEX_HOME have any effect inside the FlexSDK
I think I tagged the wrong commit. There will definitely be an RC2 and
I'll try to get it right then.
Regarding the version files, I'm just following the release guide? Did I
miss that step? Are you saying that you check in files with the versions
in them, create a tag, then revert those
45 matches
Mail list logo
