RE: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Will be on it tonight. Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:19:01 + > > Hi PMC members, > > 4.13.0 RC3 is now 12 days old. There is a +1 from Mark Kessler, and a -1 > from Ju

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hey Om, I agree with you. But instead of arguing this with Justin, can you instead find the time to vote on this package? FalconJX has enough votes. SDK 4.13.0 doesn't unless Justin changes his vote. FlexJS doesn't unless Justin changes his vote. Justin is getting failures in FlexJS that Peter

Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Hi PMC members, 4.13.0 RC3 is now 12 days old. There is a +1 from Mark Kessler, and a -1 from Justin. I think Justin's -1 is because you can't generate RSLs correctly from the source kit. It looks like we've had this problem since 4.11 and nobody has complained since the Installer sets everythi

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC8

We have finally approved Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1. Final tally (binding votes): +1 : Justin, Om, Peter, Alex Community Votes +1 : Erik On 7/8/14 12:26 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.1 to be >released. > >Issues addressed in this rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC8

+1 (binding) Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.1/rc8/apache-flex-s dk-installer-3.1.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapprov

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

And you are still getting the "file not found" in the output that lists some of these very files? The files in your earlier post are in this list. Are you running ant from the examples/DataGridExample folder or is the current directory something other than examples/DataGridExample? On 7/14/14 3:

Re: AW: Mavenizing Falcon

Other than font embedding, I think Falcon has code to handle just about everything else MXMLC can handle. The FB integration is sort of a hack right now, but it isn't clear to me that all the things MXMLC does when integrated with FB is worth replicating. I'd rather just focus on making Falcon fa

Re: [Translation] Maybe some issue in english text

IMO, it can be either way, but thanks for pointing that out. One could argue that there shouldn't be a question mark at the end. I think I've seen lots of legal acceptance statements that aren't asked in the form of a question. We'll see if some native english speaker feels strongly enough about

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hi, All that is needed for this to be released is for more PMC members to check the release and vote +1. Justin

Re: Mavenizing Falcon

Just curious, how is this related to Jose Barragan's work on the flex-falcon maven branch [1]? Thanks, Om [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo?p=flex-falcon.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/maven On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > I think the problem

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > It might be a regression, but is it really a release blocker? > I don't think it's a release blocker but IMO we should be releasing better > quality software especially if we want people to try and it and lend a hand > to fix stuff

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hi, > It might be a regression, but is it really a release blocker? I don't think it's a release blocker but IMO we should be releasing better quality software especially if we want people to try and it and lend a hand to fix stuff. Knowing how to compile it correctly helps (the instructions are

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hi, The DataGrid files mentioned under flexjsjx (after a clean) are: [java] Compiling file: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexJSRC5/apache-flex-flexjs-0.0.2-src/frameworks/js/FlexJS/libs/org/apache/flex/html/beads/IDataGridView.js [java] Compiling file: /Users/justinmclean/Docume

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Note: I tested 4 of the examples: DataBindingText, FlexJSTest_SVG, > > ListsTests, and StatesTest > > And are you OK with the DataGrid test no longer working or the multiple > scroll bars in ListTests (in the JS version)? I know it

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hi, > Note: I tested 4 of the examples: DataBindingText, FlexJSTest_SVG, > ListsTests, and StatesTest And are you OK with the DataGrid test no longer working or the multiple scroll bars in ListTests (in the JS version)? I know it alpha software be this seems to be a step backwards from 0.0.1.

[Translation] Maybe some issue in english text

Hi Guys, I'm not a native english speaker and I am far from that:), but I have found in this file http://bit.ly/1qZ4QeO some sentence witch looks a bit odd for me. This is osmf.prompt.text, at the end we have sentence "I have read the MPL1.1 license information above?" I think it should looks

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.2 RC4

+1 YES - MD5 and signed packages are correct YES - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine YES - As this is the first release please carefully check the LICENSE and NOTICE files YES - That the build script completes successfully YES - That you can compile using the results of

Re: [3/3] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - Merge branch 'FLEX-34385' into develop

Good to know, thanks. On 14 July 2014 18:41, Alex Harui wrote: > IMO, that's expected. The other commit emails contain the details that we > want to review. No need to try to amend commit messages. > > From: Mihai Chira > Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org" > Date: Monday, July 14, 2014 6:32 AM >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

So several targets after frameworks-js target is the flexjsjx target, The ant output should look like this: flexjsjx: Compiling libs/FlexJSJX.swc FALCONJX_HOME: /Users/aharui/falcon002/apache-flex-falconjx-0.0.2-src/compiler.jx Created dir: /Users/aharui/flexjs002/apache-flex-flexjs-0.0.2-src/f

Re: [3/3] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - Merge branch 'FLEX-34385' into develop

IMO, that's expected. The other commit emails contain the details that we want to review. No need to try to amend commit messages. From: Mihai Chira mailto:mih...@apache.org>> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org" mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>> Date: Monday, July 14, 2014 6

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hi, +1 (binding) for me: YES - MD5 and signed packages are correct YES - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine YES - As this is the first release please carefully check the LICENSE and NOTICE files YES - That the build script completes successfully YES - That you can compil

Fwd: $PROJECT_NAME - Build # $BUILD_NUMBER - $BUILD_STATUS!

Can someone take a look at this? Seems like some job has been mis-configured? Thanks, Om -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:05 PM Subject: $PROJECT_NAME - Build # $BUILD_NUMBER - $BUILD_STATUS! To: comm...@flex.apache.org $PROJECT_NAME - Build # $BUILD_N

Re: Installer and MD5 Checksums

On 7/13/14 9:52 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> On 7/12/14 11:05 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >> >> >On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> > >> >> The Installer 3.1 uses MD5 checksums on many of its download

Re: Apache Flex committer invite

I've just edited that page to mention git instead of svn. If something's wrong or missing, please let me know and I'll change it, or, of course, feel free to edit the page yourself. On 10 July 2014 12:15, Mihai Chira wrote: > Shall we update this wiki page[1] about our source code (and > potent

AW: Why is cygwin needed to run mustella?

Ok ... so it's probably the git bash that's doing the magic. I much more prefer that as I have to have GIT installed anyway in order to checkout the stuff ;-) Chris Von: Kessler CTR Mark J Gesendet: Montag, 14. Juli 2014 11:56 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betr

RE: Why is cygwin needed to run mustella?

You can use anything that has a shell for it. I use Git for windows currently instead of Cygwin. -Mark -Original Message- From: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 10:47 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: AW: Why is cygwin needed to run mustel

AW: Mavenizing Falcon

I think the problem with this is that nobody is maintaining FlashBuilder anymore, so if we want to switch the Compiler, we have to trick it into beleaving it's the old compiler. I bet the IntelliJ guys would take about 5 minutes to implement support for both compilers at the same time, but as lo

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hi, > Sorry, I mis-typed. The folder is: frameworks/js/FlexJS/src. I do have sources under there but not the files in question. ls -R frameworks/js/FlexJS/src | grep DataGrid IDataGridModel.js DataGridModel.js DataGridColumn.js Look like the other datagrid files are misisng? > I'm confused

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Sorry, I mis-typed. The folder is: frameworks/js/FlexJS/src. I'm confused about your scenario. You filed a bug about the build failing in 11.1, so what FP version are you using to claim a successful build? Does your ant output from the build include a frameworks-js target? -Alex On 7/13/14 11