Hi,
I’ve not has a chance to look but has the LICENSE been updated based on the
added SSL library? Is that bundled or just downloaded?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Team,
I'm struggling a lot with the problem of reading post on this dev list which
is mixed with code or stack traces.
I have polite ask to all commiters and PMCs please start using [1].
It will increase a lot readabiliti of our posts. :)
[1] https://paste.apache.org
Thank you,
Piotr
---
On 6/10/15, 10:23 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>I've reviewed updated docs and everything seems to be in place.
>One question - shouldn't we have contributor list also in the installer?
Feel free to add one. I’m waiting a couple of more days to see anyone is
opposed to me moving the Installer
Alex,
I've reviewed updated docs and everything seems to be in place.
One question - shouldn't we have contributor list also in the installer?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
>
> > HAHAHA Damn, I just had a brain flash, I I rewrote the compiler to have
> > everything that is a base extend JSObject, it would work in IntelliJ!
> haha
>
> It was what I meant :)
>
Word, I am thinking about it more, it's doable but
> HAHAHA Damn, I just had a brain flash, I I rewrote the compiler to have
> everything that is a base extend JSObject, it would work in IntelliJ! haha
It was what I meant :)
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:53:21 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Falcon
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
>
> >> Also, have you seen anything that might suggest we can disable
> IntelliJ's
> >> ECMA natives so it uses the JS.swc Object definitions?
> >
> >
> AFAIK, you can't switch to another ECMA file, it is hardcoded for the
> Flex Plugin, a
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
>
> > Fred, Anything you need help on or questions about the compiler just ask.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Also, have you seen anything that might suggest we can disable IntelliJ's
> > ECMA natives so it uses the JS.swc Object definitions?
>
> AFAIK
>> Also, have you seen anything that might suggest we can disable IntelliJ's
>> ECMA natives so it uses the JS.swc Object definitions?
>
>
AFAIK, you can't switch to another ECMA file, it is hardcoded for the
Flex Plugin, a simple go to definition on Object and you will see the
lib it depends o
> Fred, Anything you need help on or questions about the compiler just ask.
Thanks.
> Also, have you seen anything that might suggest we can disable IntelliJ's
> ECMA natives so it uses the JS.swc Object definitions?
AFAIK, you can't switch to another ECMA file, it is hardcoded for the Flex
Pl
Ok, that is inline with what I was thinking.
Let me know if you get the JS.swc, then I know I am not just hallucinating
all this. ;-)
OT; Now that you got the asdoc tokenizer working what are your thoughts
about me adding that code I have had for 3+ years to the project?
If so, where would it g
On 6/10/15, 9:19 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Alex, excuse my ignorance but "what" are your plans for integrating this,
>are you getting the JS.wsc to be built?
I’m just about to pull your change and see if I get a JS.swc.
I haven’t really thought through “what”. I may need to play with it
Alex, excuse my ignorance but "what" are your plans for integrating this,
are you getting the JS.wsc to be built?
Fred, Anything you need help on or questions about the compiler just ask.
Also, have you seen anything that might suggest we can disable IntelliJ's
ECMA natives so it uses the JS.swc
Yes, that’s an option, but if you do, then the new repo will be called
flex-maven-plugin.git so choose the name wisely. See the JIRA ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8302 for more details.
-Alex
On 6/10/15, 8:57 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Perhaps i should move the mavenize
>>So, why to generate the .abc and compare its modify date while we can do
>>that with the source file ?
>
> We would compare source file date against .abc file date and then use the
> abc as if it were from a swc and not compile the source file.
Can't do more on anything today but will follow tha
Perhaps i should move the mavenizer stuff to the flex-maven-plugin directory.
Chris
Gesendet mit meinem HTC
- Reply message -
Von: "Alex Harui"
An: "dev@flex.apache.org"
Betreff: Any progress on the new repos?
Datum: Mi., Juni 10, 2015 17:08
Infra commented in the JIRA issue that it s
On 6/10/15, 8:36 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> Volunteers are welcome to try to fix it. Or implement a whole new
>> incremental compile strategy. I think I’ve noticed that Java compiler
>> writes out an .class file and uses file dates to determine whether to
>> compile again and seems to do t
> Volunteers are welcome to try to fix it. Or implement a whole new
> incremental compile strategy. I think I’ve noticed that Java compiler
> writes out an .class file and uses file dates to determine whether to
> compile again and seems to do that very quickly. I’ve pondered whether
> Falcon would
Ok will try but with no guaranty :-)
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:25:13 +
>
>
>
> On 6/10/15, 6:37 AM
On 6/10/15, 6:37 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I've been reading the instructions before but was a bit confused the same
>:-)
>
>Well, the annotated tree seems to be well constructed by the label():
>
>FunctionCallNode(FunctionCallID) "$obj" 0:1 loc: 1-15 abs: 1-15
>flash.tools.debu
Btw, even though I force the rule to be applied, the LiteralIntegerID falls
into JBurgAnnotationGeneral and so, get no associated rules which will throw
the same exception.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subj
On 6/10/15, 6:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>For better performances, we would need to make the incremental
>compilation to work but for instance, IIRC Alex switched it off because
>it didn't work well.
Volunteers are welcome to try to fix it. Or implement a whole new
incremental compile st
Infra commented in the JIRA issue that it seems possible, but we have to
re-organize the repo a bit first. Releases that comprise multiple
top-level folders in the repo, like Installer and Mavenizer, all need to
be under one folder named after the destination repo.
For example, the Installer rele
> Out of that, the exception is thrown because after the call to
label(), the reduce()->reduceAntecedent()->getRule() fails to find
a rule to apply, actually, it can't find the cost for rule as it seems
to be no cost function for the goalState 1, at least in the class
JBurgAnnotation_FunctionCa
That's very useful Peter, many thanks!
It looks like I can use the framework.swc for the common part of these
classes. Will get round to it later this week, I hope.
On 10 June 2015 at 14:26, Peter Ginneberge wrote:
>
> I had a quick look yesterday and when I toggled "mx only" vs "spark only"
> I
Hi Mike,
Thanks for all those needed expalinations, it helped me a lot to understand
more.
> If Fred can set this up like we did with Randori in IntelliJ, we could get
> spilt second compiles just like TypeScript, the Randori incremental
> compiler was VERY fast(like save the file, .js is insta
Hi Alex,
I've been reading the instructions before but was a bit confused the same :-)
Well, the annotated tree seems to be well constructed by the label():
FunctionCallNode(FunctionCallID) "$obj" 0:1 loc: 1-15 abs: 1-15
flash.tools.debugger
IdentifierNode(IdentifierID) "$obj" 0:1 loc: 1-5 ab
I had a quick look yesterday and when I toggled "mx only" vs "spark only" I
saw the mx.swc swapped for the spark.swc. A sparkskins.swc is added for "spark
only" while there is no equivalent for "mx only".
For AIR projects a sparkair.swc is also added, there is again no mx equivalent.
Both co
So for others reading this that have no clue what is going on, we have an
ActionScript file that uses the DOM, just like TypeScript. This file can
now be compiled without Flash/SWF!!!
The FalconJX compiler is now a true AS only possibility for JS creation.
You pass the Main.as class below, it will
Fred and others;
I just committed a unit test that shows the full meal deal.
TestExternalsJSCompile.java
1. parse/compile externs .js using GCC compile()
2. emit .as from compiled externs AST
3. create JS.swc from emitted .as files
4. load FlexJS backend and compile with no playerglobal.swc, onl
Great points, thanks all.
Does anyone know how I can check which swcs are included in mx-only
projects and which in spark-only projects, so I can see where I can put the
common functionality if that's the route I / we'll choose? Thanks.
On 10 June 2015 at 12:40, Kessler CTR Mark J
wrote:
> Issu
Issues I see or agree with.
-MX only or Spark only projects.
-Inheritance of these classes / child classes.
-Possible different behavior.
-Mark
Now I understand everything.
No I didn't configure compiler in my IDE - I'm just wondering from the
development perspective how can I use in the future JS.swc once it will be
finished. :)
Awesome job Mike!
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:36 AM, piotrz wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Some question. How can I actually use JS.swc ? It will be part of FlexJS,
> but could I use it as an separate library ?
>
>
Basically what I have allowed the compiler(FalconJX) to do is type check
DOM API when compiling. Also, with the JS
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> One thing I’ve hit: FB is apparently stuck using Java 1.6. That’s how
> old the version of Eclipse is that it uses. Some of the code you’ve
> written uses Java 1.7. Can we change back to Java 1.6 syntax? Really,
> only the code paths used
Github user Dretch commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/18#issuecomment-110656554
Bump. Could this pull request be considered?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Thank you for the advice. It’s working now.
> Am 09.06.2015 um 00:32 schrieb OmPrakash Muppirala :
>
> This looks like an issue where you have not selected the correct workspace
> window. First click on the project's mxml file editor window and then run
> the external tool.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
Mike,
Some question. How can I actually use JS.swc ? It will be part of FlexJS,
but could I use it as an separate library ?
Let's say I grab JS.swc and write some code and in order to build everything
I need to use FalconJX.
Can you describe in details how you generate JS output ? :)
Thank you,
38 matches
Mail list logo
