Well if this would be the case I know exactly where one in Frankfurt could be
hosted ;-)
My company would be willing and happy to do so. Actually they are encouraging
me to do so.
But till I'll tackle that, we still need a little more progress toward maturity.
Chris
On 1/5/16, 7:49 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>BTW, I’m not sure what we said about myXML.@foo = “baz” or myXML.@ba:foo
>= “baz”.
>
>Are we mapping that to myXML.setChild(“@foo”,”baz”) and
>myXML.setChild(“@ba:foo”,”baz”), or are we creating a separate function
>for attributes?
I
On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
>
> I don't understand. If you customize your index.html.template, how does
> it matter if the app.html file gets destroyed and recreated each time?
> This is how I have it setup.
I don’t remember. Possibly I did
Is there a schedule yet for ApacheCon Europe? There was no way I was able to go
this year with the timing coinciding with the Jewish holidays. I hope the
timing next year is better…
On Jan 5, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm still hoping to get to ApacheCon EU in
On 1/5/16, 7:07 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Yes. I’m using DOMParser.parseFromString() to parse the XML. After the
>XML is parsed into DOM elements, I’m walking that to create the XML
>structure.
>
>Although, I’m beginning to wonder if it makes more sense to just write my
>own
On Jan 5, 2016 3:03 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
> It’s not just for instant gratification. (and I do agree that first
impressions are really important)
>
> In the ideal world, the template HTML file can be modified. The primary
reason I have not historically modified the HTML
I'm still hoping to get to ApacheCon EU in 2016 and tour in Europe for a
couple of weeks. It might be possible to have a Frankfurt event while I'm
there.
-Alex
On 1/5/16, 12:49 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well if this would be the case I know exactly where one in
On 1/4/16, 11:06 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>I would live to come, but it would have to be before/after apache con in
>May ... Could it be an option to do this in May instead? My boss will not
>pay two intercontinental flights within one month :-)
>
>if it was one
Hi Alex:
I would be interested in attending.
Thanks,
Jason
So far, nobody has said they are interested in attending, although I did
send this after west coast business hours. ;)
asjsc still generates all of the addDependency() calls required for a debug
build. No hand crafting needed. It generates them in a JS file named
ProjectName-dependencies.js. Not coincidentally, that is the only JS file
that you need to reference in a script tag in your HTML when running the
debug
Yes. I’m using DOMParser.parseFromString() to parse the XML. After the XML is
parsed into DOM elements, I’m walking that to create the XML structure.
Although, I’m beginning to wonder if it makes more sense to just write my own
state machine to walk the XML and build the structure on my own.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Harbs wrote:
> I cannot find a recommended way to handle CDATA in the DOM4 spec.[3]
>
> Does anyone have a recommendation o how to handle this?
>
In place of a CDATA text section you can just escape the text using xml
escaping.
That’s not going to work if you need to implement toXMLString().
Imagine an mxml file where all the CDATA becomes escaped text. It’s not going
to work very well… ;-) The same goes for lots of other XML file uses.
Apparently this recommendation for DOM4 is not gonna happen, so we’re good.[1]
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Harbs wrote:
> That’s not going to work if you need to implement toXMLString().
>
> Imagine an mxml file where all the CDATA becomes escaped text. It’s not
> going to work very well… ;-) The same goes for lots of other XML file uses.
>
>
BTW, I’m not sure what we said about myXML.@foo = “baz” or myXML.@ba:foo =
“baz”.
Are we mapping that to myXML.setChild(“@foo”,”baz”) and
myXML.setChild(“@ba:foo”,”baz”), or are we creating a separate function for
attributes?
On Jan 5, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
I should add that a "main" class shouldn't necessarily be required to have
a static method as its entry point. A developer might prefer to instantiate
it with the constructor instead.
A FlexJS framework app can (and should!) be opinionated, but asjsc needs to
be flexible, as a more generic
On 1/5/16, 9:49 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't understand. If you customize your index.html.template, how
>>does
>> it matter if the app.html file gets destroyed and recreated each
On 1/5/16, 9:53 AM, "Jason Guild" wrote:
>Will it be possible for flexjs to process ABC from a SWC and generate js
>without the source code?
Possible? Well maybe, but that's essentially the same problem as
disassembly, so I have no plans to work on such a thing right
Hi Alex,
I would drive down from Sonoma County for this.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Jason Guild wrote:
>
> Hi Alex:
>
> I would be interested in attending.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
>> So far, nobody has said they are interested in
AFAIK, the Linux Foundation has not published a date for ApacheCon EU.
-Alex
On 1/5/16, 8:08 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Is there a schedule yet for ApacheCon Europe? There was no way I was able
>to go this year with the timing coinciding with the Jewish holidays. I
>hope the
GitHub user adufilie opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5
Compiler fixes related to js.swc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/adufilie/flex-falcon patch-4
Alternatively you can review
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169096483
Where was the toString() missing? That change seems to be breaking the
CreateJS externs build. The classes generated from the externs generally don't
include
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169106519
Wasn't toString() on Object? Then it doesn't need to exist on most other
objects. But we do need to allow Number, int and uint to have their own
toString() with
Will it be possible for flexjs to process ABC from a SWC and generate js
without the source code?
I seem to remember there might have been some discussion of this from a
year or two ago now.
I am asking because I'm wondering about using FlexJS to recompile some
applications which use the ESRI
Github user adufilie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169102408
toString() was missing in every class except Number, int, uint. I've found
the problem and will add another commit here shortly. Sorry about that.
---
If your
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169119427
I'm pretty sure it is that way so your subclasses of Object can override
toString() although they can't add parameters to toString().
---
If your project is set up
Hi,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769 pretends to be fixed in
4.15 but doesn't appear in the RELEASE_NOTES of the rc1...
Is this fix really in the future 4.15 release ?
Thanks,
Maxime
On 04/01/2016 22:13, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Please place discussion here and not in the
Github user joshtynjala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169117059
Hmmm... strangely, toString() is not marked with the AS3 namespace in the
API reference. However, if I recall correctly, it is AS3 instead of public in
the
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169114711
Also, with the getStaticField/getInstanceField changes, 5 files of unit
tests have compile errors. They are: TestAnnotationEnum, TestConstructor,
TestExternChrome,
Github user joshtynjala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169118912
Okay, it appears that Number and other classes with custom toString()
methods put it in the AS3 namespace. You can see that with [Number.toString()
in the API
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169259473
I think the github integration scripts didn't quite work. Can you manually
close the pull request?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user adufilie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169221139
Ok, I've reworked and updated the patch. I managed to move all the
toString-related special-case code into a single if statement. Please try again.
---
If your
On 1/5/16, 9:39 PM, "lizhi" wrote:
>use the
>
>https://github.com/kmdjs/kmdjs .
>
>the google lib,not the best.have the circular dependency bug.
IMO, even in one file, you have to pick an order. It might be that we are
putting unnecessary goog.require statements in the output.
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169258856
Yes, there some subtle things to the extern compiler. Thanks for sticking
with it. Everything passes for me and I pushed it to the repo.
---
If your project is set
Have you tried making a commit with this magic line in the git comment?
*This closes #5*
This has worked for me in the past.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:44 PM, aharui wrote:
> Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
>
>
Github user adufilie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169212882
At one point I had it working, but you're right, it currently isn't. I
must've been modifying the wrong set of files when I was testing overriding
toString().
use the
https://github.com/kmdjs/kmdjs .
the google lib,not the best.have the circular dependency bug.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Circular-dependency-detected-tp51042.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
Github user adufilie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169223531
The one piece I didn't realize before was that since these classes are
serving the purpose of an external interface, subclasses need not include
override methods
Github user adufilie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169160089
Flash Builder does not show toString() in its content assist for Object,
and there is no error in the editor. =)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user joshtynjala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169158834
I guess, since Object is dynamic, calling toString() should still compile
if you try to call it on something typed as Object (even if it's not defined).
That
Github user joshtynjala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169116121
> The other issue was that there was a hard-coded thing in
MethodReference.java to output an "AS3" namespace for a toString() override.
Using the AS3
asjsc does not generate an index.html file, so you must be looking at the
output of mxmlc.
Today, asjsc outputs a JS file that lists the dependencies, as I described.
They're the exact same addDependency() calls that you'd see in mxmlc's
index.html.
- Josh
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:06 PM,
Hi,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769 pretends to be fixed in 4.15
> but doesn't appear in the RELEASE_NOTES of the rc1...
> Is this fix really in the future 4.15 release ?
Yes this fix is in the 4.15 release and is missing from the RELEASE_NOTES. Why
do you say “pretends to
Github user ok-at-github commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/41#issuecomment-169134911
Ok, don't know this but it makes sense ;-)
Sorry for wasted time!
Olaf
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
On Jan 5, 2016 9:36 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>
> asjsc still generates all of the addDependency() calls required for a
debug
> build. No hand crafting needed. It generates them in a JS file named
> ProjectName-dependencies.js. Not coincidentally, that is the only JS file
>
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/5/16, 9:49 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
> >
> >On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I don't understand. If you customize your
Github user ok-at-github closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/41
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, OK wrote:
> I've tried asjsc and mxmlc:
>
> Here're my observations:
> - I have to provide the full path to asjsc/mxmlc although I've used -g.
> (I've used an already installed node.js version 5.2.0, windows 7, 64bit)
>
Are you using the
Github user adufilie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169140272
I believe the patched code does the right thing. From the AS3 language
reference:
>Note: Methods of the Object class are dynamically created on Object's
Github user teotigraphix commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169141901
On a side note; When i wrote this externc, I had the same opinion as
@adufilie. It was about getting the javascript out of valid AS, that was it.
The
I've tried asjsc and mxmlc:
Here're my observations:
- I have to provide the full path to asjsc/mxmlc although I've used -g.
(I've used an already installed node.js version 5.2.0, windows 7, 64bit)
-asjsc works, it successfully creates \bin\js-release\USStatesMap.js, but
the log contains 8
On 1/5/16, 4:41 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>To bad you can't have a portion streaming with some chat.
I'm open to ideas on how to do that. I don't know this conference room at
all, it was built since I was last based in SF and in a building "down the
road" from
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #158 - Successful
Changes since last build:
No changes
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/158/.
I'll be there
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 6:28 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org; us...@flex.apache.org
Subject: [FLEXJS] FlexJS Event in San Francisco
Hi,
I have received permission from my managers to host an Apache FlexJS
To bad you can't have a portion streaming with some chat.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Jason Taylor wrote:
> I'll be there
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 6:28 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169180297
No, we just want to make sure we have the same behavior that AS coders
expect. I'll try to apply the correct set of your patches and see what happens.
---
If your
Github user joshtynjala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169161037
Yes, I see that too. Weird.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769 pretends to be fixed
> in 4.15 but doesn't appear in the RELEASE_NOTES of the rc1...
> > Is this fix really in the future 4.15 release ?
>
> Yes this fix is
Github user justinmclean commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/41#issuecomment-169164489
Thanks for double checking - we do sometimes miss people out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user adufilie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169167951
ActionScript gives an error if you try to use toString() on a non-dynamic
class that does not define it explicitly. Is there a reason we should make it
behave
On 1/5/16, 1:06 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Jan 5, 2016 9:36 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>>
>> asjsc still generates all of the addDependency() calls required for a
>debug
>>
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169167331
What happens for some non-dynamic class that extends Object? Does it get a
toString() even if it doesn't define a custom toString() function? Does the
compiler let
Next issue:
I think some people in W3C should have their heads examined. Why in the world
are they removing useful features???
The only way I can find to access CDATA in Document is with CDataSections[1]
and the nodeType: Node.CDATA_SECTION_NODE[2]
I cannot find a recommended way to handle
Github user aharui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/5#issuecomment-169200272
Still not working. Maybe the patches didn't applied correctly, but
createjs.Text.toString() is still being generated even though there is a
64 matches
Mail list logo