--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/how-flexjs-read-Embed-source-png-tp51324.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Agreed, MXML is a markup language and it it's AST form really has nothing
to do with SWF, JS or AS, it's it's own language spec. This is why JS can
be gleaned from the same thing AS is.
I know I am stating the obvious but man, working with MXML since Josh
released it for Feathers has been some of
Sure, I can contact them. Can you forward the details you sent to the
Cordova team member? If that is not for public consumption, I can write a
new email to the Wicket folks.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/19/16, 12:44 PM,
On 1/19/16, 12:44 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Jan 19, 2016 10:58 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>> OK, I finally got a response from a Cordova person. They are interested
>> in the
I don't think it needs a special name. MXML is good as it is. No
differentiation required.
- Josh
On Jan 19, 2016 1:19 PM, "jude" wrote:
> Alex, et al,
>
> Is there a name or 3-4 letter acronym we can use for FlexJS MXML to
> differentiate it from Flex MXML? I'm drawing
FlexJS uses the same exact MXML that Flex SDK uses. It just operates on a
different default namespace - Flex SDK, with mx, spark, etc. and FlexJS
with basic, js etc. Structurally they are (should) be the same.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:18 PM, jude wrote:
I looked into this.
Because A is the first file loaded, it must require B in order to load B.
B extends A so it must require A otherwise you get a warning from Google
Closure Compiler. That's why -remove-circulars won't remove B's require
of A.
So, unless Google Closure Compiler changes their
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> IMO, a base class shouldn't know about any extensions.
>
I agree, and I don't think we should bend over backwards trying to support
this pattern.
OK, I finally got a response from a Cordova person. They are interested
in the client-side track idea. Once they get approval from their dev
list, we should submit talks and do more coordination. I think instead of
cross posting to both dev@ lists, maybe we should try the wider
Is there any option to avoid multiple instances of the map? I did try using
extent
var et:MapExtent = new MapExtent(90, -90, 180, -180);
// myMap.map.setExtent(et);
myMap.extent = et;
But there is no change in the map.
The problem is, for US map, some part gets
Does it have to be zoomed out so much? If you zoom in a bit, I think this
issue will get fixed.
Thanks,
Om
On Jan 19, 2016 10:04 PM, "Deepak MS" wrote:
> Is there any option to avoid multiple instances of the map? I did try using
> extent
>
> var et:MapExtent = new
Hmm this looks like a big in the mapping component, and probably not just
the AS3 version. I think contacting the Modest Map folks might be the
best option.
Thanks,
Om
On Jan 19, 2016 10:38 PM, "Deepak MS" wrote:
> Nope. Zoom value is 4 and this is how it's shown on
FlexJS will currently ignore Embeds. We need to actually spit out some
sort of warning/error some day.
-Alex
Well, I tried earlier approach for 4 days, but it didn't quite work as
expected. Entire map needs to be rendered using svg alone or based on
long/lat points. Its difficult to merge lat/long based custom regions over
svg.
But modestmap worked well. Thank you so much for sharing those links.
On 15
14 matches
Mail list logo