Another way to think about it: It would be awesome if, as a customer used
a code coverage tool to test their app, that the code coverage of the
framework code in their app reached 100% as the customer's code coverage
reached 100%. Such a thing is generally never going to happen for regular
Flex a
At the highest level, the reason for beads and PAYG is not just for SWF
code, it is for JS code as well. And the net result should be that code
you didn't in your app, isn't in your app. Lots of people will need CORS
support, but lots of people won't. Now we could go overboard putting
every meth
Oh, now that you’ve cleared up I could do some initial tests and it looks
great. One can benefit a lot from using FlexJS to migrate the ActionScript
application’s core to JS.
I will definitely look at it later on.
At this moment I don’t have the time to migrate the application. The first
FlexJS is a framework that allows you to take your existing ActionScript
and build HTML5 based application from that.
There is no support for the FlexSDK UI components -- but there are many
comparable components that exist and are being created. Essentially, you
will be able to bring over your bu
Ahh I forgot to mention that you can see issue when you look into MDLExample.
Main TabBar do not display Tabs.
Basically in TabBarView itemsCreated method has not been called.
If you lost in there I will put some basic example.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View th
Hi Peter,
After couple of hours of investigation I have found the reason and fixed
bug. You can check it.
But still something is wrong in case when TabBar is using
TabsItemRendererFactoryForArrayData. If you could take a look that would be
great!
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzy
I just took a look at UIDUtil.
If I dump Core.SWC, the UIDUtil.js in there has the following:
goog.provide('org.apache.flex.utils.UIDUtil');
/* FlexJS Static Dependency List: org.apache.flex.utils.BinaryData*/
goog.require('org.apache.flex.utils.BinaryData');
goog.require('org.apache.flex.utils.
For me, FactoryComposer.js in the TLF.swc has:
goog.provide('org.apache.flex.textLayout.compose.FactoryComposer');
goog.require('org.apache.flex.textLayout.compose.StandardFlowComposer');
goog.require('org.apache.flex.textLayout.compose.utils.FactoryHelper');
goog.require('org.apache.flex.textLay
I don't need to have DataProviderChangeNotifier do what I made it do. I
was thinking that using the same event was causing the problem in the MDL
tabs because that event causes all of the item renderers to be thrown
away.
‹peter
On 4/9/17, 9:47 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Peter,
>
>I just tested your
I think Peter wrote the original implementation, and you are probably right on
most of your points that a lot of the code should be pulled out into beads.
I’ll let Peter or Alex comment on the original implementation, but it could be
it’s time to re-write some of it.
Harbs
> On Apr 9, 2017, at
Hi,
> Therefore code to deal with authentication should not be in the base
> component.
So in that case should the code dealing with HTTPs headers should be removed?
I can see the class is also dealing with timeouts should that also be removed
and placed in a bead?
The class is also missing J
Peter,
I just tested your changes. They are breaking the cases where I would like
to change whole data provider once everything is renderer. I'm going to get
back to the previous version and implement beads as I wrote above, late I
will deeply look into the Tabs problems.
Thanks,
Piotr
-
On Apr 9, 2017, at 5:54 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> But still it would be great to have Bead which holds it.
>
> Can you elaborate why you think it should be in a bead?
Most use cases of HTTPService does not require authentication.
Therefore code to deal with authentication should
Thanks a lot for the responses!
Let me ask another question then. What about the FlexJS project? Is it a safe
alternative to migrate code from Flex Air/Actionscript to HTML/Javascript?
Cheers,
Gabriel
> On 3 Apr 2017, at 03:29, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Development]
> wrote:
>
>
Understand now. If it not optional than probably can be as you stated as part
of API.
Sorry for misunderstanding.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-git-commit-flex-asjs-refs-heads-deve
Hi,
> But still it would be great to have Bead which holds it.
Can you elaborate why you think it should be in a bead?
This fixes a security issue on the JS side in an existing component. There no
PAYG cost AFAICS and it’s not adding a new feature or something that should be
optional.
If use
Hi Justin,
But still it would be great to have Bead which holds it. Small separate
extension. Let user used to use bead and think in a FlexJS way not Flex.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.c
Hi,
HTTPService on the AS side supports this security feature via cross domain
policies built into the Flash Player. CORS is a little more complex and
sometimes requires both client and server configuration rather than just mostly
server side as AS security does. I think users of FlexJS would w
18 matches
Mail list logo