Personally, while I think Justin is more than capable to be the chair,
things are running smooth right now and we do have some momentum behind us.
No need to change things right now so long Alex wishes to remain the PMC
Chair.
-Nick
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On
On Dec 1, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Doug McCune wrote:
> My personal opinion is that you guys should swap and give Justin (or
> someone else who's interested) the opportunity for a year. One thing the
> project needs is good bench strength if anything were to happen that would
> limit someone's involvem
Hi,
> I also think that self-nomination may be an issue as well. I'm not sure how I
> want to respond to thAt part.
I did ask if any anyone else was interested in the role. This discussion is
trying to find out if there is any consensus for change.
As per our (newish) guidelines [1] it's firs
Hi,
> If there are only a few, should we change less
> often, or just keep cycling through those few, or is that, once you've had
> your turn, you can't return to the role?
I see no issue in returning to the role, you you did a good job no reason you
cant again - of course you need to be voted in
My personal opinion is that you guys should swap and give Justin (or
someone else who's interested) the opportunity for a year. One thing the
project needs is good bench strength if anything were to happen that would
limit someone's involvement. I'd be concerned with the prospect of Adobe
pulling f
Exactly it is a time for friends and family here in the US.
I also think that self-nomination may be an issue as well. I'm not sure how I
want to respond to thAt part.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2013, at 3:45 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> I don't care myself. My impression
On 12/1/13 6:28 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> "There's the additional rationale keeping Alex in the position as I
>>think
>> it would be less likely for folks at Adobe to assign him to some
>>non-Flex
>> position if he's the Flex PMC chair."
>
>I'd be concerned if we thought that Alex ne
Hi,
> "There's the additional rationale keeping Alex in the position as I think
> it would be less likely for folks at Adobe to assign him to some non-Flex
> position if he's the Flex PMC chair."
I'd be concerned if we thought that Alex needed to be the chair for Adobe's
continual involvement in
I see it exactly the same way (Except for the thing with the letters and the
number) ;-)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013 12:52
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex chair
I didn&#
I didn't care, and thought the rational to give more people the experience
is a good one. However, the logic in following argument might be sound and
a bit scary.
"There's the additional rationale keeping Alex in the position as I think
it would be less likely for folks at Adobe to assign him to
I don't care myself. My impression is that many of the folks on this
list are US based; and you started the conversation at the start of a
major US Holiday [Thanksgiving]. That may have contributed to the lack
of a response. I, myself, have been running non-stop for 6 days [and I
have two
Hi,
Not exactly a huge response of this so I'd assume most people don't care one
way or another. Anyone else have something to say?
Justin
Hi,
> I was under the impression I was only a committer. I think the the team page
> is a mistake.
Sorry you're right it seems that it s in error. I had thought for some reason
you were on the initial list of committers and thus become a PMC when the
project become a TLP.
Justin
I was under the impression I was only a committer. I think the the team page is
a mistake.
Harbs
On Nov 29, 2013, at 4:55 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I was speaking about Harbs, because he said we was committer only, and the
>> Team page shows he is P+C.
> He's a PMC member so could b
Hi,
> I was speaking about Harbs, because he said we was committer only, and the
> Team page shows he is P+C.
He's a PMC member so could be voted in as chair. I think a few of people don't
realise that they are PMC members as they were not directly vote in like more
recent PMC members.
As per
g the same ?
Not a big deal anyway...
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 29 novembre 2013 00:50
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex chair
Hi,
> FYI, you appear as C+P on the Apache Flex Tea
Hi,
> FYI, you appear as C+P on the Apache Flex Team page.
All of the initial committers were made PMC as well, so it only people who have
been voted in since that time may be "only" committers. 3 or 4 (I think of top
o f my head) have been voted in as PMC.
With the recent guidelines been voted
Well if you want a turn and it gets voted on. I'll agree to fairness is
change.
-Mark
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Flex-chair-tp32664p32722.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
As I said in my original email I think Alex has done/is doing an excellent job.
One other reason may consider changing the chair is r educed risk to the
project. Having people take on different roles means that there is less risk if
someone who has always done that role suddenly leaves the
essure on you ;-)
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 28 novembre 2013 15:29
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex chair
I think Justin has been doing an excellent job getting out releases, but at the
same time,
IMO I'm accepting of Alex to remain as long as he wishes as he is doing a
fine job. The chair has additional duties such as doing quarterly reports,
board meeting minute reviews, new pmc member changes / coordination, and
such. However the decisions made for the Apache Flex project are voted on
b
I think Justin has been doing an excellent job getting out releases, but at the
same time, Alex has been doing an excellent job as Chair.
I'm from the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp. So, I'd vote to keep Alex
as Chair.
There's the additional rationale keeping Alex in the position as I t
On 28/11/2013 06:52, Erik de Bruin wrote:
Unless Alex resigns, of course, my vote would go to "never change a
winning team," and I really think we're winning.
Me too. I think Justin is doing a great job getting the releases out though.
Tom
+1 to Justin taking over.
-1 to Alex resigning.
I guess I am torn.
My vote is 0.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Unless Alex resigns, of course, my vote would go to "never change a
> winning team," and I really think we're winning.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu,
Unless Alex resigns, of course, my vote would go to "never change a
winning team," and I really think we're winning.
EdB
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's coming up on a year of Alex being the Flex PMC chair, as per our
> recently voted in guidelines [1] it
Hi,
It's coming up on a year of Alex being the Flex PMC chair, as per our recently
voted in guidelines [1] it's time to review that.
I think Alex done an excellent job and I know he'd happy to continue in the
role, but I'd like to see it change so other people get the chance to
experience th
26 matches
Mail list logo
