Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

I’m in Apple Mail on both iOS and MacOS Regards, Dave > On Sep 19, 2017, at 2:13 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Erik, >> >> You should do this on the VOTE thread. >> > > This is the

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

I don’t truly believe the actual name makes a huge difference. None of the options are really zingers like “React” or “Vue”. Ultimately people just use the name as a way to refer to the Framework (or set of frameworks). To me Royale does not sound like software. (I don’t know why.) “Crown”

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Om, In pony [1] and nabble [2] it displays differently. [1] https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@flex.apache.org [2] http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-What-should-be-the-new-Project-Name-for-Proposed-fork-of-FlexJS-td64433.html Piotr 2017-09-19 20:13 GMT+02:00

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

> > > You should do this on the VOTE thread. > > This is the VOTE thread. At least that is what my gmail thinks it is... > My Gmail agrees ;-) EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Erik, > > You should do this on the VOTE thread. > This is the VOTE thread. At least that is what my gmail thinks it is... Thanks, Om > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:40 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Erik, You should do this on the VOTE thread. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > I'm changing my vote to: > > 1) Limb(e)r > 2) Bead(s) > 3) Braid > > Sorry for any confusion. > > EdB > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

I'm changing my vote to: 1) Limb(e)r 2) Bead(s) 3) Braid Sorry for any confusion. EdB On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > What a dilemma! > > I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I wanted to > see what the trend was first.

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-( EdB On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went before > it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. > > My new favorite is Limber, but

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went before it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can break a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, right?) EdB On Tue, Sep 19,

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

What a dilemma! I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I wanted to see what the trend was first. If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third, Royale has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber have 10. Boja has been mentioned more