Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Schmalle
> > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:53:21 -0400 > > Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to > javascript compile > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:

RE: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to > javascript compile > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Frédéric THOMAS > wrote: > >> >>>> Also, have you seen anything that m

Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Schmalle
rote the compiler to have everything that is a base extend JSObject, it would work in IntelliJ! haha Mike > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > ---- > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [FalconJ

Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Schmalle
follow that path, indeed I > guess > >> I will need yours or Mike's help regarding the compilation itself at > some > >> point. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> > >> > >> --

RE: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
ill see the lib it > depends on, in JS, they did it more flexible, not in Flex. > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > ---------------- >> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:19:16 -0400 >> Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to >> javascript compile

RE: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> Can't do more on anything today but will follow that path, indeed I guess >> I will need yours or Mike's help regarding the compilation itself at some >> point. >> >> Thanks, >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >>

Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Schmalle
Ok, that is inline with what I was thinking. Let me know if you get the JS.swc, then I know I am not just hallucinating all this. ;-) OT; Now that you got the asdoc tokenizer working what are your thoughts about me adding that code I have had for 3+ years to the project? If so, where would it g

Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/10/15, 9:19 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >Alex, excuse my ignorance but "what" are your plans for integrating this, >are you getting the JS.wsc to be built? I’m just about to pull your change and see if I get a JS.swc. I haven’t really thought through “what”. I may need to play with it

Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Schmalle
> Frédéric THOMAS > > > -------- > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to > javascript compile > > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:48:36 +000

RE: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
hing today but will follow that path, indeed I guess I will need yours or Mike's help regarding the compilation itself at some point. Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Unit tes

Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/10/15, 8:36 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >> Volunteers are welcome to try to fix it. Or implement a whole new >> incremental compile strategy. I think I’ve noticed that Java compiler >> writes out an .class file and uses file dates to determine whether to >> compile again and seems to do t

RE: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to > javascript compile > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:17:55 + > > > > On 6/10/15, 6:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: &g

Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/10/15, 6:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >For better performances, we would need to make the incremental >compilation to work but for instance, IIRC Alex switched it off because >it didn't work well. Volunteers are welcome to try to fix it. Or implement a whole new incremental compile st

RE: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
10 Jun 2015 08:10:15 -0400 > Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to > javascript compile > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > So for others reading this that have no clue what is going on, we have an > ActionScript fi

Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Schmalle
So for others reading this that have no clue what is going on, we have an ActionScript file that uses the DOM, just like TypeScript. This file can now be compiled without Flash/SWF!!! The FalconJX compiler is now a true AS only possibility for JS creation. You pass the Main.as class below, it will

[FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to javascript compile

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Schmalle
Fred and others; I just committed a unit test that shows the full meal deal. TestExternalsJSCompile.java 1. parse/compile externs .js using GCC compile() 2. emit .as from compiled externs AST 3. create JS.swc from emitted .as files 4. load FlexJS backend and compile with no playerglobal.swc, onl