[Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi, I just wanted to post, that I have finished setting up a new version of the Website. The source is located in the "maven-site" branch of the "flex-site.git" repository. This is a Maven build which produces the Website using the maven-site-plugin and the reflow-site plugin to render a res

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Alex Harui
Is there a URL we can go to and see the results of this workflow? -Alex On 10/12/16, 5:48 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > > >I just wanted to post, that I have finished setting up a new version of >the Website. The source is located in the "maven-site" branch of the >"flex-site.git" reposit

AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
actly that path and it worked as expected. Chris Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016 18:31:05 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic Is there a URL we can go to and see the results of this workfl

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > So has anyone else had a look at the newly generated documentation in the > flex-site.git "maven-site" branch? As I mentioned, if you checkout the > "asf-site" branch you can see the generated output. Just taking look now. It been a couple of busy weeks with conferences and other work (y

AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Christofer Dutz
more into shape :-) Chris Von: Justin Mclean Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 09:44:27 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic Hi, > So has anyone else had a look at the newly generated documentation in the > flex

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
is site a little more into shape :-) > > > Chris > > > Von: Justin Mclean > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 09:44:27 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic > > Hi, > > > So has

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Harbs
ittle more into shape :-) >> >> >> Chris >> >> ________________ >> Von: Justin Mclean >> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 09:44:27 >> An: dev@flex.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation t

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
; this site a little more into shape :-) > >> > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> Von: Justin Mclean > >> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 09:44:27 > >> An: dev@flex.apache.org > >> Betreff: Re:

AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 10:33:28 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic Never mind, I checked out the flex-site. The proper fix would be to 1. Remove the class "navbar-fixed-top" on the navbar div in all pages. 2. Set padding-to

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
result in the > "target/site" directory. > > > > Chris > > ____ > Von: omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash > Muppirala > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 10:33:28 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [Website] Pr

AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Christofer Dutz
y and allows us to auto-generate something looking very similar to our current Website. Chris Von: Maxim Solodovnik Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 11:54:40 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic On Fri, O

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
something > looking very similar to our current Website. > > > Chris > > > Von: Maxim Solodovnik > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 11:54:40 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic >

Re: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Alex Harui
e browser :-) > > >At least I just checked exactly that path and it worked as expected. > > >Chris > > >Von: Alex Harui >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016 18:31:05 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: [Website] Progress on the Website

AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
/ws/target/site/index.html But you have to login to the Jenkins instance ... hope that's not too much to ask for ;-) Chris Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016 19:45:54 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [Website] Progress on the Webs

AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
Harui Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016 19:45:54 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic I'm seeing emails titled "Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot". Are you sure we can't see the buildbot output? I think you'd get mo

Re: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Alex Harui
pts to get the menus and carousel >working. > > >Chris > > >Von: Alex Harui >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016 19:45:54 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic > >I'm seei

AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
ing "mvn clean site" 3. Commit and push them That's it. Nothing more to it. Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Alex Harui Datum: 12.10.16 20:20 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Websit

Re: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Alex Harui
Well, maybe I'm just being dense, but in the most recent two threads you started on this topic, you mention buildbot, and I saw a lot of buildbot traffic come into my mailbox. So apologies if I haven't followed your emails in detail, but I did not see any prior mention of not needing buildbot and

AW: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
___ Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2016 06:40:35 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic Well, maybe I'm just being dense, but in the most recent two threads you started on this topic, you mention

AW: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Christofer Dutz
Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2016 07:49:01 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic Hi Alex, Well you do need buildbot ... nothing else is allowed to commit. But nothing else than buildbot. I was ta

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-14 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/14/16, 12:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > >So if we are comparing the new three-step user workflow: > >1. Do changes > >2. Test them locally with a "mvn clean site" > >3. Commit changes > > >to the current user workflow, which is: > >1. Do changes > >2. Commit changes > >3. Wait for bui

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-19 Thread Christofer Dutz
te-maven" and different solutions could co-exist. All that I want, is the ability to produce the sites of sub-modules such as FlexJS (and it's part) automatically. Chris Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 17:20:05 An: dev@flex.apache.org Bet

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-19 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/19/16, 2:18 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Ok picking up this thread again ... > > >Well I think that allowing non-comitters to contribute to the page is a >pretty slim benefit. I couldn't say that we have used that even for a >single time in the past. And I think it would be good not to a

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

2016-10-19 Thread Christofer Dutz
: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic On 10/19/16, 2:18 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Ok picking up this thread again ... > > >Well I think that allowing non-comitters to contribute to the page is a >pretty slim benefit. I couldn&#x