Ah, I misunderstood which asdoc-config file.
On 6/30/17, 1:31 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>The asdoc target doesn't work because we've extended ActionScript for
>FlexJS. We only care about the ASDoc Example. I guess we should comment
>out the asdoc target for now.
The asdoc target doesn't work because we've extended ActionScript for
FlexJS. We only care about the ASDoc Example. I guess we should comment
out the asdoc target for now. Also, it looks like the ASDoc example uses
its own asdic-config.xml file in its src/main/config folder.
-Alex
I'm running the asdoc target in flex-asjs and it has rejected a couple of
things in Core/main/flex/Promise.as such as:
[asdoc]
/Users/pent/dev/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/flex/Promise.as(270):
col: 19 Error: Syntax error: expecting identifier before catch.
[
OK, I removed the Flex SDK ASDoc part of the build. Next build is
probably less than 2 hours away.
-Alex
On 3/15/17, 11:21 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>I think we have enough agreed on switching it to FlexJS ASDoc. We have
>failing build on jenkins [1] for a long time,
Alex,
I think we have enough agreed on switching it to FlexJS ASDoc. We have
failing build on jenkins [1] for a long time, which means that none can try
the fresh changes through the installer.
[1] http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
M, "piotrz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
> +1 for switching.
>
>I can spent some time to try make your ADoc visually similar to the old
>one.- But for sure it won't be fast. My reference will be
>http://flex.apache.org/asdoc/
>
>It
-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-was-Re-FlexJS-maven-faling-WeakMap-tp60325p60335.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 3/9/17, 9:45 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
> +1 for switching.
>
>I can spent some time to try make your ADoc visually similar to the old
>one.- But for sure it won't be fast. My reference will be
>http://flex.apache.org/asdoc/
>
>It can be nice
Hi Alex,
+1 for switching.
I can spent some time to try make your ADoc visually similar to the old
one.- But for sure it won't be fast. My reference will be
http://flex.apache.org/asdoc/
It can be nice excercises.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this me
Renaming this thread to get more attention as well.
The Ant build is trying to generate ASDoc and failing because it uses the
Flex SDK compiler to generate ASDoc and it can't handle the new compiler
features we've added to Falcon.
So again, see my questions below. The ASDoc example i
Hi,
I just pushed some changes that add a new goal to the flexjs-maven-plugin. I
added a configuration using this to the Core module in frameworks. You should
see the output in the target/asdoc directory. Here the swf directory contains
the output if the compilation is set to SWF and the js
On 12/22/16, 12:28 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Ok ... yesterday I completely refactored the compiler to work without the
>SharedData.
Thanks for doing that.
>The only thing no longer working is the ASDoc generation.
>
>Right now it’s probably even relate
ASDoc generation. Unfortunately I now
have to go and do a major refactoring of my new house (tear off the seiling
insulation) ...
probably I’ll have the time to finish this this evening or tomorrow.
Right now it’s probably even related to ASDoc using a custom FlexJSASDocProject
class ... must be
.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/14/16, 9:38 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Today I finally got enough of a FlexJS ASDoc app running to mention it on
>the list, in hope that other folks can pitch in to help us finish it and
>help prove that FlexJS can help folks do something useful, as we
n the COMPILE::SWF, but we need to do that for the ASDoc app itself.
-Alex
On 12/21/16, 3:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Ok now I managed to get things up and running. Having a look at the way
>the asdocs are generated from ANT I can see that they are generated wi
existing tool will be able to do that.
Regarding IntelliJ ... I know that in the Maven world IntelliJ provides the
content assist by automatically downloading the „sources“ and the „javadoc“
artifacts for an artifact it is using. I know that „javadoc“ is a silly name
for something containing ASdoc
Hi Alex,
I’ll have a look at that ... would be great to resolve this as then I could
mark the maven plugin as threadsafe and we could speed up build times by
utilizing paralell builds.
Chris
Am 21.12.16, 16:28 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
On 12/21/16, 12:41 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrot
Hi Alex,
I simply removed the JS version of CSSTextField as this wasn’t referenced
anywhere and with that change I managed to proceed. I am still struggling with
a static bleed issue as the compiler state seems to be shared between the
differenct compiler types, but I think I’ll manage to fix t
mail.com
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reas
>on-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57504.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57504.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 12/20/16, 10:48 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I’m currently workin on Maven support of the ASDoc output. Now I’m sort
>of wondering, why we need these „doc-namespaces“ and „doc-sources“ config
>options? Shouldn’t the normal sources and namespaces be enough?
On 12/21/16, 12:41 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Unfortunately the JSSharedData is byting me at the moment ... I’m having
>static stuff bleeding into one execution from another ... we should
>generally address that sooner than later ☹
In a quick look, JSSharedData appears to be used in place
On 12/21/16, 3:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>So far so good. The SWF xml outupt looks gread, even if I don’t know why
>classes, index and tags are Json files, but I’ll fix that later.
Basically, I did JSON output first, and was only half-way through the DITA
output when I put it down to de
rong understand it ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57499.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
properties that only
exist in SWF or JS, so I think a real api documentation should contain both and
point out if an element is available in SWF, JS or both. I am trying to do this
in the compie-asdoc maven mojo by doing a compilation for SWF and outputting
things to „target/asdoc/swf“ and a
PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57489.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57489.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hint ? It
will be an html output ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57487.html
Sen
-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57487.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I’m currently workin on Maven support of the ASDoc output. Now I’m sort of
wondering, why we need these „doc-namespaces“ and „doc-sources“ config options?
Shouldn’t the normal sources and namespaces be enough?
Chris
Hi,
> Is this true? The article Om posted seems to disagree.
While Google can index content from JS apps [4] they may not index all content
or may not give it equal weight / ranking to other static content. It’s
complicated, for instance see [1][2] (answered by a Google employee). And
exactly
SDK, build a custom library and generate
the ASDocs for it without also getting the regular Flex SDK. I have
already written enough code in Falcon and FlexJS to produce this ASDoc
app. Next step would be DITA files to do ASDoc in code hinting for FB and
FDT and maybe other IDEs.
Up above you men
it without also getting the regular Flex SDK. I have
already written enough code in Falcon and FlexJS to produce this ASDoc
app. Next step would be DITA files to do ASDoc in code hinting for FB and
FDT and maybe other IDEs. Last is a way to convert DITA to HTML via XSLT.
Which I don't know
On 12/18/16, 5:27 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Google doesn’t index JS applications
Is this true? The article Om posted seems to disagree.
>I think HTML is best for that usecase.
>Displaying help in IDEs ususally works by looking for a file with the
>same name and relative path as the class
wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Or could our framework dump out the resulting DOM and generate the
> >>static
> >> >HTML that way?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >You are probably the only person who could build and maintain this
> >>static
> >> >HTML that way?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >You are probably the only person who could build and maintain this :-)
> >> >I would say, XSLT sounds easier than this.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Maybe I&#
d and maintain this :-)
>> >I would say, XSLT sounds easier than this.
>> >
>>
>> Maybe I'm not understanding something, but IMO, XSLT is an alternative
>>for
>> ASDoc, but isn't an alternative for all other FlexJS applications.
>
>
>X
esulting DOM and generate the static
> >HTML that way?
> >
> >
> >You are probably the only person who could build and maintain this :-)
> >I would say, XSLT sounds easier than this.
> >
>
> Maybe I'm not understanding something, but IMO, XSLT is an a
person who could build and maintain this :-)
>I would say, XSLT sounds easier than this.
>
Maybe I'm not understanding something, but IMO, XSLT is an alternative for
ASDoc, but isn't an alternative for all other FlexJS applications. Is the
only way FlexJS apps can work with
On Dec 16, 2016 3:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
On 12/16/16, 3:06 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>I am surprised by the complexity of [1]. But because we have a tool
>chain, I wonder if the tool chain should somehow help. Should we have a
>tool that calls PhantomJS or some equivalent?
Or could our f
On 12/16/16, 3:06 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>I am surprised by the complexity of [1]. But because we have a tool
>chain, I wonder if the tool chain should somehow help. Should we have a
>tool that calls PhantomJS or some equivalent?
Or could our framework dump out the resulting DOM and generat
On 12/16/16, 1:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>
>IMO, this problem
>> needs to be made easy for all FlexJS applications and that's one reason
>>to
>> make ASDoc a RIA. So we can show folks how to do it. Are there r
] and is well supported, for instance all modern
>browsers support XSLT.
Others who know XSLT and can help support its use for ASDoc, please speak
up now. If we don't get more names, then it effectively makes you two
gatekeepers of an important feature, which is, IMO, not a good idea for
any Apa
;
> >
> >Also, for SEO we need pre-formatted HTML whichever way you decide to do
> >it.
>
> Are you sure about this? I was under the impression that all RIAs,
> whether written in Flex or not, had to simply return HTML for some URL.
The file didn't actually have
I have been
working on this project regularly for around 5 years so the risk is low. There
should also be other people who know some XSLT, it been around a while (1999+)
[2] and is well supported, for instance all modern browsers support XSLT.
> Let's first discuss this one point: Sho
o simply return HTML for some URL.
The file didn't actually have to exist statically. IMO, this problem
needs to be made easy for all FlexJS applications and that's one reason to
make ASDoc a RIA. So we can show folks how to do it. Are there really
static pages behind Home Depot and Amazon's stores?
-Alex
If IDEs show docs on hover or in completion while you're coding, it's
usually from parsing the original ASDoc or some intermediate format (I
think SWCs can include that DITA format that Alex was talking about).
- Josh
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >I think we don't need to decide one way or the other right now. We need
> >simple html docs for sure.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. What
On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
Muppirala" wrote:
>I think we don't need to decide one way or the other right now. We need
>simple html docs for sure.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. What does "simple html" mean and why
do we need it?
-Alex
The Angular docs actually aren't static HTML. It looks like an Angular app!
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/function/angular.forEach
If you view source on the page above, you can see that there's a Loading...
placeholder and the real content is loaded dynamically.
- Josh
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016
I think we don't need to decide one way or the other right now. We need
simple html docs for sure. I think having the docs as an RIA as pretty
cool as well.
For example, AngularJS docs is available as mostly static content here:
https://docs.angularjs.org/api
For this kind of doc, we just need s
On 12/16/16, 1:51 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>What do I have to do to get the XML files? I’ll have a look at what I
>find.
In flex-falcon/compiler-jx there is a
org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.ASDOCJSC.java
It works just like MXMLC and COMPC. If you specify
-js-output-type=FLEXJS_DITA yo
think would be most people.
OK, but you have said elsewhere you have little time to contribute. The
fewer things folks have to know to contribute the better. Honestly, I've
always wanted to replace the XSLT in the regular Flex ASDoc. We know
folks have to know AS to participate. What happen
Hi,
> I have the beginnings of a DITA emitter, but it needs finishing. You are
> welcome to finish it. IMO, the project is better off not having new
> dependencies on XSLT. It is great that you are an expert at it, but it is
> more important that we have redundancy in the community
I also know
dependencies on XSLT. It is great that you are an expert at it, but it is
more important that we have redundancy in the community, so relying on
languages most of us know is better. If you want to modify the ASDoc app
to generate HTML pages that's great as well, but I don&
On 12/15/16, 3:02 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>If there now is a „asdoc.jar“ created by the ant build, the proper way to
>do this in Maven would be to create a „asdoc“ module. Creating multiple
>jars from one codebase is usually an indicator for the need to refactor.
Well,
off not having new
dependencies on XSLT. It is great that you are an expert at it, but it is
more important that we have redundancy in the community, so relying on
languages most of us know is better. If you want to modify the ASDoc app
to generate HTML pages that's great as well, but I don&#
If there now is a „asdoc.jar“ created by the ant build, the proper way to do
this in Maven would be to create a „asdoc“ module. Creating multiple jars from
one codebase is usually an indicator for the need to refactor.
Chris
Am 14.12.16, 19:10 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
O
XML ... where is
that output to and what do I need to do to make him generate that?
Chris
Am 14.12.16, 18:38 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
Hi,
Today I finally got enough of a FlexJS ASDoc app running to mention it on
the list, in hope that other folks can pitch in to help us
which Jira
issues can be filed. It's nice to have simple code that demonstrates the
problem in a self-contained app, but a lot of people will find it easier to
just reference the docs app.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FLEXJS-ASDo
This is a great idea. Here are thr proper links (not broken by newlines)
[1] SWF version:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/FlexJS%20ASDoc%20Example/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/examples/flexjs/ASDoc/bin-debug/ASDoc.html
[2] JS version:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job
of adding the pom to compile the sources I know how
to do. There are two pieces that I would rather someone else do:
1) There is now an asdoc.jar from flex-falcon/compiler-jx. This needs to
be integrated into the Maven build for flex-falcon and the jar deployed as
a Maven artifact
2) The Ant script
Hi Alex,
great work! :)
I updated the pom.xml and uploaded, but doesn't has any content yet at the
momento (but compilation is working in js) :)
2016-12-14 18:38 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> Hi,
>
> Today I finally got enough of a FlexJS ASDoc app running to mention it on
> the l
Hi,
Today I finally got enough of a FlexJS ASDoc app running to mention it on
the list, in hope that other folks can pitch in to help us finish it and
help prove that FlexJS can help folks do something useful, as well as make
it easier for folks to write code with FlexJS.
Normally, our ASDoc is
Oh another thing. We have some split documentation for our Adobe SDK and
Apache SDK ASDocs. What did we come up with before for merging the two in some
fashion?
-Mark
etreff: RE: Re: [FalconJX] Generating ASDoc
> flex.apache.org/docs/flexjs/com.example.SomeComponent/
> flex.apache.org/docs/flexsdk/com.example.SomeComponent/
This would be great for be a great format for IDE's to be able to load
documentation specific to the component you have selected.
-Mark
> flex.apache.org/docs/flexjs/com.example.SomeComponent/
> flex.apache.org/docs/flexsdk/com.example.SomeComponent/
This would be great for be a great format for IDE's to be able to load
documentation specific to the component you have selected.
-Mark
On 10/12/16, 10:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>Well I know IntelliJ uses the javadoc modules automatically. So that
>would be one :-)
I didn't know the Flex SDK came with javadoc modules. Is that something
FlexMojos provides?
>
>
>And if the dita XML contains all the importan
endet: Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016 18:43:55
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [FalconJX] Generating ASDoc
On 10/12/16, 5:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Just to join in on the discussion ... I was consumed by the Website task
>for the last few days and couldn't find th
On 10/12/16, 5:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Just to join in on the discussion ... I was consumed by the Website task
>for the last few days and couldn't find the time to participate here.
>
>
>Are you talking about a cool bells&whistles version of ASDoc f
Just to join in on the discussion ... I was consumed by the Website task for
the last few days and couldn't find the time to participate here.
Are you talking about a cool bells&whistles version of ASDoc for which still
the static version will be generated? Or are you thinking about
Hi Jason,
That's a pretty good assessment of the problem.
Whether XML or JSON, the data set is pretty much the same: It will look
like a subset of ObjectUtil.getClassInfo or describeTypeJSON. Each class
and each of its members has not only the ASDoc that annotates it, but also
a set of
t;
being discussed right now could have some UI that allows the user to
toggle what or how documentation is seen based on selection of these
kinds of facets. That's something the old static ASDoc output could
never do: it was static and one-size-fits-all. I always wanted to know
about / re
According to MDN and caniuse, IE 10 supports the history API.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/History_API
http://caniuse.com/#feat=history
On caniuse, sometimes supported versions are hidden because they aren't
widely used anymore. It may look like IE 11 is the minimum version wh
On 10/11/16, 1:10 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Anchors could probably be acceptable as a starting point in a minimum
>viable product. That wouldn't need the server-side integration. However,
>you don't need to use anchors with the HTML history API. Calling
>pushState() changes the address bar wit
t;from Google, it's not very useful. I guess Google's crawler will run
> >JavaScript, though. With that in mind, maybe a non-static app can be used
> >for the API reference and still be indexed.
>
> I completely agree that ASDoc must be searchable. I don't know how
ll run
>JavaScript, though. With that in mind, maybe a non-static app can be used
>for the API reference and still be indexed.
I completely agree that ASDoc must be searchable. I don't know how folks
solve this problem, but IMO, it isn't limited to ASDoc. Any RIA, written
in Flex
ct 11, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FlexJS currently has its ASDoc generated by calling the ASDoc tool in the
> flex-sdk repo. That's because the Falcon compiler code we got from Adobe
> had no implementation of ASDoc support. We could probably go on like thi
Hi,
FlexJS currently has its ASDoc generated by calling the ASDoc tool in the
flex-sdk repo. That's because the Falcon compiler code we got from Adobe
had no implementation of ASDoc support. We could probably go on like this
forever, but it would be nicer to be able to have FlexJS/FalconJ
Using flex-typedefs is a good idea!
I don't have time at the moment, but if I remember in a few weeks, I'll try
to take a look. If anyone else can jump in sooner, feel free.
- Josh
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Josh,
>
> Do you have time to work on
Josh,
Do you have time to work on it? I think ASDoc just processes a set of
source paths. It might be possible to point a source path to the .as
files from flex-typedefs.
-Alex
On 9/15/16, 9:06 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>I was talking to someone who is using FlexJS to buil
I was talking to someone who is using FlexJS to build an app. One thing
they mentioned is that they found it confusing that top level classes like
String, Array, etc. were not in the FlexJS asdoc, but others like QName and
Namespace were.
Now, I understand that we have custom implementations of
se this ... I'll dig a little deeper ... and
>I don't think having API documentation is a small fish ... I think it's
>essential. Ok ... you could continue to use the old ASDoc but this just
>makes things more complicated for new users (and existing ones)
FalconJX doesn't
entually I could use this ... I'll dig a little deeper ... and I don't think
having API documentation is a small fish ... I think it's essential. Ok ... you
could continue to use the old ASDoc but this just makes things more complicated
for new users (and existing ones)
Chris
___
I think there are past discussions about ASDoc and Falcon in the archives.
I think FalconJX does keep the asdoc around in the AST nodes. I think you
are probably right that Falcon doesn't. Some folks think that writing an
ASDoc Emitter for FalconJX will be the fastest way for us to get
to be written asdoc
parser, that doesn't seem to exist yet. I remember the old asdoc having
problems so it might be better to write a new one. Is the format described
anywhere? I'd like to write an antlr4 grammar from that.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
---
I think Adobe still uses the older asdoc in their AIR SDK with ASC 2.0 too.
- Josh
On Aug 1, 2016 7:52 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
> On 8/1/16, 7:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
> >S ... any ideas/suggestions/whatever? Hope I didn't stum
cratch.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2016 16:42:47
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [FlexJS] ASDoc?
Oh gee ... I can confirm it not no work ;-)
I had a look at ant and was surprised to see it using the antTasks from the
normal FDK. I used the asdoc-template.xml fo
On 8/1/16, 7:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>S ... any ideas/suggestions/whatever? Hope I didn't stumble over a
>"TODO: This feature has to be implemented" :-(
I got lost reading your email. ASDoc generation works from the flex-sdk
for generating ASDoc f
Oh gee ... I can confirm it not no work ;-)
I had a look at ant and was surprised to see it using the antTasks from the
normal FDK. I used the asdoc-template.xml form framework to create a new
template and used that in a new ASDoc mojo. It turned out the compiler doesn't
understand
On 8/1/16, 5:57 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>as I have just added the JavaDoc generation to the Java side of the
>build, now I thought ... hey, how about adding ASDoc too. But
>unfortunately I don't recall the latest state of that. Does ASDoc in
>
Well I would probably create a mojo for generating the asdocs and create a
reporting plugin. So the ASDoc would be handled equally to the JavaDocs in
Maven (I would like to name the artifacts "javadoc" though, cause I know this
way Eclipse and IntelliJ should be able to auto-detect an
t; as I have just added the JavaDoc generation to the Java side of the build,
> now I thought ... hey, how about adding ASDoc too. But unfortunately I don't
> recall the latest state of that. Does ASDoc in Falcon work?
>
>
> Chris
Hi,
as I have just added the JavaDoc generation to the Java side of the build, now
I thought ... hey, how about adding ASDoc too. But unfortunately I don't recall
the latest state of that. Does ASDoc in Falcon work?
Chris
r Ent
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2016 20:47:12
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FlexJS]ASDoc
Harbs - Just saw your commit. That's one way to do it! I was just going
through the files, one by one to see the ramifications of changing them
back. Beat me to it.
Thanks,
Peter
On 5/10/1
10, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Found a couple of issues and repaired them; the asdoc builds cleanly
>>>for
>>> me now.
>>> —peter
>>>
>>> On 5/10/16, 10:48 AM, "Peter En
I have not been able to get the asjs repo to build at all since Chris’
>> last commit. Is it working for you?
>>
>> On May 10, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Found a couple of issues and repaired them; the asdoc builds cle
or you?
>
>On May 10, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Found a couple of issues and repaired them; the asdoc builds cleanly for
>> me now.
>> —peter
>>
>> On 5/10/16, 10:48 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>>
>>>
I have not been able to get the asjs repo to build at all since Chris’ last
commit. Is it working for you?
On May 10, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Found a couple of issues and repaired them; the asdoc builds cleanly for
> me now.
> —peter
>
> On 5/10/16,
Hi,
Found a couple of issues and repaired them; the asdoc builds cleanly for
me now.
—peter
On 5/10/16, 10:48 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'll take a look at this and see what I can find.
>‹peter
>
>On 5/10/16, 9:51 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>>
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
