Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

I would just be creating more png.xml files and checking them in. This will have the side-effect of making a repo clone take longer, and slow down git status further, but once done just about any player version should work. The process I use to create png.xml files is: 1) pick a folder of test th

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

And if we solve them... will there be as many failures when we go back to 11.1? We were thinking we might run once a day against 11.1 and once a day against 11.7... EdB On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > OK, but a reminder that there will be lots of bitmap compare failures wh

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

FWIW, I think the tests are still running in some earlier namespace. On 6/20/13 2:56 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >3.7, I think... how can I be sure? I looked at the 'airsdk.xml' in >AIR_HOME and that has "xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/air/sdk/3.7";>" > >EdB > > > >On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, J

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

On 6/20/13 3:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> 1055 passing and 68 failing tests. The -failures run reports 0 passing >> and 0 failures, so something is wrong there... > >Ah, it looks like what's wrong was me... I didn't put in '-apollo' on >the failures run. The full command for failures on the

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

On 6/20/13 5:04 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Interesting... > >Ran "-apollo", this time got 1059 passing and 68 failing. Note the 4 >'extra' passing results, while there are still 68 failing tests... >Where did those come from? Sometimes a SWF just doesn't startup. I have no idea why. But ther

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

OK, but a reminder that there will be lots of bitmap compare failures when you switch to 11.7 and resolving them are not my favorite thing to do. On 6/20/13 4:19 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> 3.7, I think... how can I be sure? I looked at the 'airsdk.xml' in >> AIR_HOME and that has "http

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Interesting... Ran "-apollo", this time got 1059 passing and 68 failing. Note the 4 'extra' passing results, while there are still 68 failing tests... Where did those come from? The "-apollo -failures" no works, but reports 0 passing and 52 failing... What happened to the remaining 16 failures?

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Hi, > Ok, having to pick two, would you rather run against 11.1 and 11.7 > (both 'long term support') or against 11.1 and the latest and greatest > released version (currently 11.7, but soon 11.8)? +1 for 11.1 and 11.7 from me but other people may think differently. Justin

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Ok, having to pick two, would you rather run against 11.1 and 11.7 (both 'long term support') or against 11.1 and the latest and greatest released version (currently 11.7, but soon 11.8)? For AIR we'll always run against the most recent release (non-beta). EdB On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:42 PM,

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Hi, > If 11.7 is the new long term support version, why not move to that as > the "default" FP version for Apache Flex? Why stick with 11.1? We don't want to force people to use the very latest, many enterprises have locked down systems and may not be able to move to FP 11.7. > And how about the

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

If 11.7 is the new long term support version, why not move to that as the "default" FP version for Apache Flex? Why stick with 11.1? Also, I think we can squeeze 2 full runs of all three targets in a day. I can set up two sets of tests (e.g. 11.7 and the latests and greatest - currently the 11.8 b

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Hi, > 3.7, I think... how can I be sure? I looked at the 'airsdk.xml' in > AIR_HOME and that has "http://ns.adobe.com/air/sdk/3.7";>" Sound right. Probably need to run the normal SDK tests with FP 11.7 as well. Perhaps it would be good to alternate what version of FP the tests are using ie stoc

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Ok, the "-mobile" target also runs now. I see 3932 passing and 18 failing tests. Now I'll re-run the "-apollo" target to see if the changes to the -failures command have a positive effect... EdB On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: >> 1055 passing and 68 failing tests. The -

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

> 1055 passing and 68 failing tests. The -failures run reports 0 passing > and 0 failures, so something is wrong there... Ah, it looks like what's wrong was me... I didn't put in '-apollo' on the failures run. The full command for failures on the AIR tests is now: "sh ./mini_run.sh -apollo -failur

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

3.7, I think... how can I be sure? I looked at the 'airsdk.xml' in AIR_HOME and that has "http://ns.adobe.com/air/sdk/3.7";>" EdB On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> I just ran "-apollo" successfully on the VM. The initial run reports >> 1055 passing and 68 failin

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Hi, > I just ran "-apollo" successfully on the VM. The initial run reports > 1055 passing and 68 failing tests. What version of AIR out of interest? Justin

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Hi, I just ran "-apollo" successfully on the VM. The initial run reports 1055 passing and 68 failing tests. The -failures run reports 0 passing and 0 failures, so something is wrong there... Now moving on to the "-mobile" tests... EdB On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I f

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

I forgot we added a -mobile option to mini_run.sh. You have to set up a local.properties as specified in the wiki except but leave adl_extras and run_mobile_tests and use_apollo commented out. They will get set by the -mobile option. On 6/19/13 12:49 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> 20 minutes fo

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

> 20 minutes for AIR. > 82 minutes for mobile. > Add more for -failures runs if needed. Ok, I'll add these 2 runs to jenkins.sh. Might be a good idea to keep the 'failures.txt' of each completed set (regular + -failures)? > I got a lot of bitmap failures that I'm looking into now. Which reminded

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

I just tried it on my Mac. 20 minutes for AIR. 82 minutes for mobile. Add more for -failures runs if needed. I got a lot of bitmap failures that I'm looking into now. Which reminded me that if a check-in goes bad and generates a lot of bitmap failures that slows things down (all the bad pngs hav

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

This is definitely a great milestone :-) Om On Jun 19, 2013 2:32 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > Cool, we had a clean run!!! > > Let the games begin ;-) > > EdB > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:01 AM, wrote: > > See > > > > > > -- > Ix M

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Can you give me an indication how long a run of each type takes? EdB On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Alex Harui wrote: > For AIR it should be ./mini_run.sh -apollo tests/apollo > > For mobile you'll need to swap in a different local.properties before > running mini_run on the mobile directory. S

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

For AIR it should be ./mini_run.sh -apollo tests/apollo For mobile you'll need to swap in a different local.properties before running mini_run on the mobile directory. See the wiki page for how to set that up. -Alex On 6/19/13 2:48 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >11.1, indeed. > >And I guess not

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

11.1, indeed. And I guess not on the AIR and mobile tests... what ant targets/switches make that happen? EdB On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> Cool, we had a clean run!!! > > What version of FP was being used? (Windows and 11.1) > > And you'll probably hate

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Hi, > Cool, we had a clean run!!! What version of FP was being used? (Windows and 11.1) And you'll probably hate me for bringing this up but did we run the mobile or AIR tests? Thanks, Justin

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

Cool, we had a clean run!!! Let the games begin ;-) EdB On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:01 AM, wrote: > See > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_mustella #177

See