On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Hi,
I spent some time going through your new framework. First off, I think
it
deserves to be called something else. The JS in ASJS implies that
it
is a JS specific implementation of the framework. In reality it
Om,
I see your point. Here's mine: Alex's new framework has an AS and a JS
part. Currently projects build using his AS part are compiled with
FalconJS to run in the browser using his JS framework. Alex has named
his framework combo FlexJS. I think that name (FlexJS) should be
revisited as that
Message-
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Om
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 20:22
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ASJS and Starling (was Re: [FalconJx] where I'm going to be)
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Changing
/nay lol.
http://www.doesmybrowsersupportwebgl.com/
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Newman [mailto:capta...@unfocus.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:37
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ASJS and Starling (was Re: [FalconJx] where I'm going to be)
WebGL isn't supported by IE
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Om,
I see your point. Here's mine: Alex's new framework has an AS and a JS
part. Currently projects build using his AS part are compiled with
FalconJS to run in the browser using his JS framework. Alex has named
his
On 1/21/13 5:21 PM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Changing subject because GPU rendering usually gets a lot of replies.
In this new framework, I am trying to separate everything into little
chunks
I call beads. The
Hi,
I spent some time going through your new framework. First off, I think it
deserves to be called something else. The JS in ASJS implies that it
is a JS specific implementation of the framework. In reality it is not.
Well, I called that to show that it is a parallel framework. That we
