gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that without config adjustments. That might not
>> > >>> be
>> > >>>>>>>>>> possible
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> with
>> > >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Andrey about the increase in metaspace size
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I have no concerns for 1.11.0.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
;>> expect
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that without config adjustments. That might not
> >>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> possible
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
t;>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Andrey about the increase in metaspace size
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I have no concerns for 1.11.0.
> > >>>>>&
;>> expect
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that without config adjustments. That might not
> >>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> possible
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
&
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>&g
because user would not have to read all docs
> to
> > > fix
> > > >> it
> > > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> then maybe this change is not even needed.
> > > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >
;>>> > > > > > repeated
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> job"
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> - I don't think we have consensus on the exact
> > >> >>>> s
gt; >>>> > > > > > > > >>> About "FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM
> >> >>>> > Metaspace"
> >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> - Have we consensus that this is okay for a
> b
t; > > > >>> that keep their flink-conf.yaml.
>> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>
>> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> We may need to unblock the release form these two
>> >>>> issues
>> >>>> > and
>> >>>> > > > > think
>> >>>> > > > > > > > about
>> >>>> > >
gt; > > >>>>> Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> +1 to start 1.10.1 release cycle.
> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >>>
gt;>>> - FLINK-16441: Allow users to override flink-conf
>>>> > > parameters
>>>> > > > > from
>>>> > > > > > > SQL
>>>> > > > > > > > >> CLI
>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> environment
>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> this allows users to set e.g. statebackend,
>>>> watermark
>>>> > > > interval,
;>>>>
>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 20:37, Yu Li <
>>> car...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for the suggestion Andrey!
; > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 18:18, Andrey Zagrebin <
>> > > > > > > azagre...@apache.org
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > &
; its
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> OutOfMemoryError
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> which should be merged soon
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I think we should also try to get in the following
> > > issues:
> > > >
gt; > > >>>>> OOM
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> failure should point users to the docs immediately
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-16408] Bind
ob
> > > > > > >>>>>> (instead
> > > > > > >>>>>>> of AskTimeoutException)
> > > > > > >>>>>>> This problem has recently happened for multiple users
> > > > > > >>&
jingsongl...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for driving. Yu. +1 for starting the 1.10.1
> release.
> > > > &
1.10.1 release.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Some issues are very important, Users are looking forward to
> > > them.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>>>>> Jingsong Lee
> > > > >>>>&g
t;>>>>>>>> +1 for starting the 1.10.1 release cycle.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Yangze Guo
> > > >>>>>>>
r 11, 2020 at 1:42 PM Xintong Song <
> > >>>>> tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Yu,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
the explanation.
> >>>>>>>>>> I've no concerns. I was just trying to get some inputs for
> >>>>>>> prioritizing
> >>>>>>>>>> tasks on my side, and ~1month sounds good to me.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>&g
;
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:15 PM Yu Li
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> bq. what is the time plan for 1.10.1?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> According to the history, the first patch release of a major
> >>>>> version
> >>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>> take ~1month from discussion started, depending on the speed
> >> of
> >>>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>> issue resolving:
>
], released on Oct
>>> 19th
>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We won't rush to match the history of course, but could use
>> it
>>>> as a
>>>>>>>>> reference. And please feel free to l
; > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-Flink-1-8-1-td29154.html
> > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > [2]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-8-1-released-td30124.html
> > > >
t; > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-9-1-released-td34170.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On
; > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 11:54, Xintong Song
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Yu, for the kick off and volunteering to be the release
> > > manager.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for the proposal.
> > >
> > > > > +1 for the proposal.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > One quick question, what is the time plan for 1.10.1?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you~
> > > > >
; >
> > > > +1 for the proposal.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > One quick question, what is the time plan for 1.10.1?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you~
> > > >
> > > > Xintong Song
> > >
?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:51 AM Zhijiang
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
> > > > +1 on my side
> > > >
> > > >
> >
gt; On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:51 AM Zhijiang
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
> > > +1 on my side
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Zhijiang
> > >
> > >
> > > --
Zhijiang
> >
> >
> > --------------
> > From:Yu Li
> > Send Time:2020 Mar. 10 (Tue.) 20:25
> > To:dev
> > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.10.1
> >
> > Thanks for the supplement H
y side
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
> --
> From:Yu Li
> Send Time:2020 Mar. 10 (Tue.) 20:25
> To:dev
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.10.1
>
> Thanks for the supplement Hequn.
Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
+1 on my side
Best,
Zhijiang
--
From:Yu Li
Send Time:2020 Mar. 10 (Tue.) 20:25
To:dev
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.10.1
Thanks for the supplement Hequn. Yes will also keep
Thanks for the supplement Hequn. Yes will also keep an eye on these
existing blocker issues.
Best Regards,
Yu
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 19:10, Hequn Cheng wrote:
> Hi Yu,
>
> Thanks a lot for raising the discussion and volunteer as the release
> manager!
>
> I found there are some other issues[1]
Hi Yu,
Thanks a lot for raising the discussion and volunteer as the release
manager!
I found there are some other issues[1] which are marked as a blocker:
- FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files
- FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and u
Hi Jincheng,
Yes, your help would be very helpful. Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Yu
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 18:24, jincheng sun wrote:
> Thanks for bring up the discussion Yu. I would like to give you a hand at
> the last stage when the RC is finished.(If you need) :)
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
>
>
Thanks for bring up the discussion Yu. I would like to give you a hand at
the last stage when the RC is finished.(If you need) :)
Best,
Jincheng
Yu Li 于2020年3月10日周二 下午5:49写道：
> Hi All,
>
> It has been almost one month since we released Flink 1.10.0. We already
> have more than 40 resolved im
Hi All,
It has been almost one month since we released Flink 1.10.0. We already
have more than 40 resolved improvements/bugs in the release-1.10 branch,
and I propose to start the 1.10.1 release cycle.
Most noticeable fixes are:
- FLINK-16241 [legal] Remove the license and notice file in flink-m
41 matches
Mail list logo
