Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-10-04 Thread Jark Wu
@Jark >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Rong >> > > >> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee > > .invalid> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> +1 non-binding >> > >> (nit: Add a road map?) >> > >> >> > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-10-04 Thread Jark Wu
t; >> +1 non-binding > > >> (nit: Add a road map?) > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Jingsong Lee > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> From:Kurt Young >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-10-04 Thread Rong Rong
ngsongLee .invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 non-binding > >> (nit: Add a road map?) > >> > >> Best, > >> Jingsong Lee > >> > >> > >> ------------------ > >>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-10-04 Thread Timo Walther
JingsongLee wrote: +1 non-binding (nit: Add a road map?) Best, Jingsong Lee -- From:Kurt Young Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44 To:dev Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2) +1 Best, Kurt On Thu, Sep

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-09-28 Thread Rong Rong
-- > From:Kurt Young > Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44 > To:dev > Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2) > > +1 > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-09-26 Thread JingsongLee
+1 non-binding (nit: Add a road map?) Best, Jingsong Lee -- From:Kurt Young Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44 To:dev Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2) +1 Best, Kurt On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-09-26 Thread Danny Chan
+1, thanks for the effort, Jack ! Best, Danny Chan 在 2019年9月26日 +0800 AM11:52，Jark Wu ，写道： > Hi all, > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and > reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-09-26 Thread Kurt Young
+1 Best, Kurt On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and > reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after > Oct. 01 08:00

[VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

2019-09-25 Thread Jark Wu
Hi all, I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Thanks, Jark [1]:

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL

2019-09-19 Thread Jark Wu
Hi, There are some new valuable suggestions and comments in the design documentation since the vote started. I will update the documentation and summarize it in the [DISCUSS] thread. I hereby cancel the vote. Will start a new vote once we get a general consensus on the changes. Thanks, Jark On

[VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL

2019-09-18 Thread Jark Wu
Hi all, I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after Sep. 24 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Thanks, Jark [1]: