Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

> > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I would not disable YARN detached mode, it is used quite a > > bit &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

streaming > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> users and makes perfect sense for streaming jobs, which are > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> always > > >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

at 11:20, Stephan Ewen < > se...@apache.org > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

elhi m. +91-9871457685 On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to that, Stephan. > > I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800. > > > From: Stephan Ewen > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02 > To: dev@flink.apache.org > Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

, but the yarn detached mode is faulty for > >> > > interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most basic > >> starting > >> > > point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster -yd -n <> > >> > > examples/Wordcount.jar* fail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

t; m. +91-9871457685 > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 to that, Stephan. > > > > > > I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800. > > > > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

t; > > > -- Sachin Goel > > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > > > m. +91-9871457685 > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 to that, Stephan. > > > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

;> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode is faulty for > >> > > interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most basic > >> starting > >> > > point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

;>>>>> (call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster and then >>> returns >>>> an >>>>>>> empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user program tries >>>> to >>>>>>> access th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

> I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800. > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen > > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02 > > To: dev@flink.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0) > > > > > > From my

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

luster -yd -n <> >> > > examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way. >> > > >> > > >> > > -- Sachin Goel >> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi >> > > m. +91-9871457685 >> > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 201

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

; > > sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode is faulty > for > > >> > > interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most basic > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

gt; >> > like Flink to support detached execution mode but I suggest to >> disable >> > >> > detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can include a >> > proper >> > >> > support for the next release. >> > >> > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

t;>>>>>>>> I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian. It's a good idea to start >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> testing the >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> release candidate. We might discover more issues on the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

> >> to > >> > >> > access the ExecutionResult. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for the > release. I > >> would > >> > >> > like Flink to support detached exe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

support detached execution mode but I suggest to > > disable > > > >> > detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can include a > > proper > > > >> > support for the next release. > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 20

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

(call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster and then > > >> returns an > > >> > >> > empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user program > > >> tries > > >> to > > >> > >> > access the ExecutionResult. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

rom: Stephan Ewen Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0) From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found another blocker bug, so this RC will need a few patches. I think for 2824 th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

; >> > >> support > > > >> > >> > for the standalone cluster mode. The reason why eager > execution > > > >> doesn't > > > >> > >> > work with detached programs is that the client submits the > > first > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

t; >> > >> > Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for the release. I >> would >> > >> > like Flink to support detached execution mode but I suggest to >> disable >> > >> > detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

mode for YARN in this release. We can include a > proper > > >> > support for the next release. > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sachin Goel < > sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be the last RC :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I seco

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

t;>> > >>>>>>>>>> always > >>>>> > >>>>>> one-shot > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> currently. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

Awesome! Thanks Max :)) I have a couple of questions: - what about the blocker issue (according to the wiki) FLINK-2747? - weren't we going to get rid of staging altogether? Cheers, -V. On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen wrote: > Super, thanks Max! > > We should also

[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

Dear community, The past months we have been working very hard to push towards 0.10. I would like to propose the first release candidate. === Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version 0.10.0: The commit to be voted on:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

Release candidates have to be tested thoroughly. Therefore, I would like everybody to take a look at the release page in the wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release I've compiled the checks into a document. I would like everyone to assign one of the checks in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge :) Unfortunately I have to say -1 FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point of view. Cheers, Gyula Vasiliki Kalavri ezt írta (időpont: 2015. okt. 21., Sze, 20:07): > Awesome! Thanks Max :)) > > I have a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

I would also point out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800 could be worth of further investigations before this release Best, Flavio On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula Fóra" wrote: > Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge :) > > Unfortunately I have to say -1 > > FLINK-2888

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

@testers: I think it's OK to forward test results not touching these parts to the next RC. On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Gyula Fóra wrote: > > FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point of view. > Regarding FLINK-2824: from the discussion on the ML [1] I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

>From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found another blocker bug, so this RC will need a few patches. I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what would actually be the desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a release blocker. I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

+1 to that, Stephan. I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800. From: Stephan Ewen Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0) >From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found another blocker

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)

Super, thanks Max! We should also bump the master to the next version then, to separate what goes into release fixes and what goes into the next version... Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a separate thread, I guess... On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian Michels