[JIRA] Commented: (FOR-284) link rewriting broken when linking to xml source views which contain site: links

2005-04-16 Thread issues
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: David Crossley Created: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:43 AM Body: The workaround for FOR-156 was so close to working. Its trouble was only that it needed to deal with docs in sub-directories as well as at top-level. This needed on

Re: CSS in view/viewHelper (was Re: using view/viewHelper)

2005-04-16 Thread Diwaker Gupta
> > Due to the way CSS works, if I have to define new properties for > > the nav-bar say, then I first have to UNDO all of the changes made by > > the CSS files loaded by default, and then define the CSS properties > > the way I want them to. > > ... > > A simple option that controls inclusion of d

CSS in view/viewHelper (was Re: using view/viewHelper)

2005-04-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
I opened up a new thread to respecify the focus. *Point 1 - css linking* On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 14:54 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote: > After some playing around, I seriously think the CSS should be > *completely* decoupled from the nugget contracts. The problem with the > current implementation is th

Re: Tidying up plugins for 0.7 release

2005-04-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 13:06 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 17:33 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > > > So, unless there is a -1 before by the end of the weekend I will move > > the following plugins to whiteboard/plugins next week. > > > o.a.f.p.internal.views > > o.a.f.p

Re: using view/viewHelper

2005-04-16 Thread Diwaker Gupta
After some playing around, I seriously think the CSS should be *completely* decoupled from the nugget contracts. The problem with the current implementation is that it includes all the default CSS files (eg: basic.css, contracts-.css and so on) and then it loads the CSS file specified by forrest:cs

Re: using view/viewHelper

2005-04-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
I will have to go right now, but a quick response on that. On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 13:05 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote: > I was looking at nav-main.ft, and found that the background images in > the CSS were using URLs of the form '/skin/images/.gif' -- this > assumes that the deployed forrest site

Re: using view/viewHelper

2005-04-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
That bug is fixed in trunk. On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 15:59 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 21:32 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote: > > > I made some changes to add custom css to the view. > > > > Great! > > > > > > > > > > > This tag has to be direct son from forrest:view! > > >

Re: using view/viewHelper

2005-04-16 Thread Diwaker Gupta
I was looking at nav-main.ft, and found that the background images in the CSS were using URLs of the form '/skin/images/.gif' -- this assumes that the deployed forrest site is deployed a domain whose top level contains a skin directory. That is, this will NOT work if my website is deployed at s

Re: using view/viewHelper

2005-04-16 Thread Diwaker Gupta
Awesome! While we're at it, I wonder why we have those elaborate color definitions in skinconf.xml? Since we are going to use CSS for skinning anyways, doesn't it make more sense to put the color definitions into CSS as well? Just a thought. On 4/16/05, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: using view/viewHelper

2005-04-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 21:32 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote: > > I made some changes to add custom css to the view. > > Great! > > > > > > > This tag has to be direct son from forrest:view! > > > > In the above link you will find: > > > > > > That means e.g. > > > > > > would expect (with defau

Re: using view/viewHelper

2005-04-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Hi Diwaker, firstly thanks for taking the time to test and give feedback. That is helping us so much. :) On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 21:53 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote: > > I made some changes to add custom css to the view. > > > > > > Life's good so far. Now, from what I see, it seems that the nugge