David Crossley wrote:
...
Here is the current schedule:
Tuesday 19 July
Event: Apache Committers Hackathon
Time: all day
Location: ApacheCon
Probably I will be staying only Monday and Tuesday during the week, as I
cannot stay away for more than two days f
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 08:43 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> ...
> > I'm currently experimenting with the locationmap code, I have it working
> > "to an extent". But have not yet managed to get it to work at the
> > generation stage (through lack of time rather than a prob
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
I'm currently experimenting with the locationmap code, I have it working
"to an extent". But have not yet managed to get it to work at the
generation stage (through lack of time rather than a problem with the
code, I think). I will attach a patch against the current SVN
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > Probably faster to try turning it on than for someone to type a reply (I
> > don't know the answer by the way).
>
> My question was more about hidden side effects that I wouldn't find
> through trial and error. But since nobody seems to know I'l
Ross Gardler wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> >Why have you called this thread a Random Thought? It sounds
> >like a proposal. Be aware that people often ignore RT threads
> >until they have time to investigate, whereas proposals need
> >the attention of committers.
>
> B
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: David Crossley
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 8:59 PM
Thanks, fixed now.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-515
Here is an overview of the iss
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Ross Gardler (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 6:51 PM
Changes:
Fix Version changed to 0.7-dev
-
For a full history of the issue, see:
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Addison Berry
Created: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 6:14 PM
Body:
Note that Tim Williams found the bug in the file originally.
-
View this comment:
http://issues.coc
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Addison Berry (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 6:10 PM
Comment:
Attached a patch that removes the duplicate year that is within the otherwise
clause. This makes the year always appear as non-link text, one time
regard
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-515
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
Key
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 13:12 -0400, Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 15:27 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> > Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 10:34 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>I don't see the value in th
Addi wrote:
Thanks for finding that for me. I agree that the only difference should
be the vendor hyperlinked or not and the year always there. I found
where you are and I commented out line 301 to do it this way instead. I
hadn't ever ventured into these files so it took me a while to figur
Tim Williams wrote:
On 6/2/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
Sent to dev as suggested.
On 5/18/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
Has anyone already documented how to use Slide as a backend to
Forrest? If not maybe some high-l
Thanks for finding that for me. I agree that the only difference should
be the vendor hyperlinked or not and the year always there. I found
where you are and I commented out line 301 to do it this way instead. I
hadn't ever ventured into these files so it took me a while to figure
out where
On 6/2/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> > Sent to dev as suggested.
> >
> > On 5/18/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Tim Williams wrote:
> >>
> >>>Has anyone already documented how to use Slide as a backend to
> >>>Forrest? If not maybe some hi
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 19:04 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Thorsten, what would the equivalent to the above be in views?
I started the work in view on it and it seems to work till the final
stage. :( ...but I guess it is a bug that I hope to find quite fast. ;-)
I tes
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 15:27 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 10:34 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
...
I don't see the value in this. I would imagine that regardless of what
skin you are using you would want the same value
On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 19:04 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > Thorsten, what would the equivalent to the above be in views?
>
> I started the work in view on it and it seems to work till the final
> stage. :( ...but I guess it is a bug that I hope to find quite fast. ;-)
> I tested with one cont
On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 15:27 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 10:34 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>I don't see the value in this. I would imagine that regardless of what
> >>skin you are using you would want
Mikler wrote:
Hello!
Hi, because your mail discusses some additional ideas for Forrest I have
sent this response to the Forrest dev list for further comment.
If you are not already a member of the dev list you should join in order
to see other devs responses to your ideas.
http://forrest.apac
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 10:34 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
Hello,
A few days ago I added issue FOR-506 on this topic. This is my original
message:
"Text strings like "Copyright", "Published", and "Search" are
hardcoded into skin files like sit
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 10:34 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > A few days ago I added issue FOR-506 on this topic. This is my original
> > message:
> >
> > "Text strings like "Copyright", "Published", and "Search" are
> >hardcoded into skin files like si
For the proper fix, I'm not sure what *should* happen if there is a
copyright-link. Right now the copyright year is not included when
copyright-link exists, should it? Seems to make sense that the only
difference would be if copyright-link exists then vendor would be a
hyperlink instead of text?
-
Looks like a bug in pelt. When you don't have a copyright-link it
prints it out both explicitly before the choose and again inside the
"otherwise". A quick fix is to just comment out line 289. I think
this should be an issue though.
--tim
On 6/2/05, Addi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 10:34 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
...
I don't see the value in this. I would imagine that regardless of what
skin you are using you would want the same values to appear in the
output site.
Skins will have different set of labels. "cop
On Thu, 2005-02-06 at 10:34 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > A few days ago I added issue FOR-506 on this topic. This is my original
> > message:
> >
> > "Text strings like "Copyright", "Published", and "Search" are
> >hardcoded into skin files like si
I'm using 0.7 svn and when creating a new site I am getting a duplicate
copyright date ( Copyright © 2005 2005 The Acme Software Foundation.)
prior to making any edits to anything. The year is only in the
skinconf.xml file once so it looks like it is getting duplicated
somewhere in processing.
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Ross Gardler
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 8:47 AM
See the Chart output plugin
-
View the issue:
http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-189
Here is an overview of
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
So I guess the outcome of the 'fuzzy' debate is that this issue is a
blocker and we will delay the 0.7 release once again?
If so, how much time do we have in case we decide to get rid of the
xdocs-folder?
We will *not* be getting rid of the xdocs folder in 0.7. This is
David Crossley wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>> > Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>> > > Hello all,
>> > >
>> > > as more mails I read (mainly from Ross and David) as more I get a fussy
>> > > feelings in my stomach about the 0.7.
>> > >
>> > > Sure we want to get the 0.
Torsten Stolpmann wrote:
As Claudia already pointed out, most work done on pelt was rather
destructive (disabling/removing features we didn't need/like/got in the
way) than constructive.
I've often wanted to disable certain features in our skins, but never
found the time to do it. The diffs
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
And would I still have an additional separate entry in the sitemap to
have /old_site_1/index.htm on the menu or would this have to be
within the rawContent element.
Do you mean "would I still have an additional separate entry in the
*skins.xml
Ross Gardler wrote:
>> And would I still have an additional separate entry in the sitemap to
>> have /old_site_1/index.htm on the menu or would this have to be
>> within the rawContent element.
> Do you mean "would I still have an additional separate entry in the
> *skins.xml*"?
Sorry, I wa
Hi!
I drop in for Claudia here, since I did most of the skin modification
stuff for the website myself. But yes, Claudia is reading this as well.
First of all: The modification of common skin elements is definitly
reversable as already pointed out by several people here. It was done
the way
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Anyway, +1 for implementing it instead of the skinHTMLSources=true
workaround.
Pardon my ignorance but is this
A third possibility that is a marrying of the two is elements in
site.xml to make it much more like the Ant fileset idea, like this:
As all committers will now know Apache is a mentoring organisation in
Googles Summer of Code initiative.
I have already submitted (and received interest in) a proposal to build
voice plugins for Forrest. However, there is plenty of scope for other
proposals.
The idea is that the student be m
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Anyway, +1 for implementing it instead of the skinHTMLSources=true
> workaround.
Pardon my ignorance but is this
> A third possibility that is a marrying of the two is elements in
> site.xml to make it much more like the Ant fileset idea, like this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
I think it is the best option (apart from the views plugin).
We work as a community to develop one really good skin that
can address most needs and enables people to configure it.
-1
Until 'views' is available it would really help to make o
Ross Gardler wrote:
> This is a good idea, but I recommend we wait on this second proposal
> until we have the 0.8 docs in place. This will happen immediately after
> the 0.7 release. I propose this because there will be very little
> content, and therefore very little value for the 0.7 relea
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
In my opinion what should happen is that the relevant chapter outline
should be ripped out of the proposal and put into SVN as XHTML documents
that we can point to via an URL to SVN. With our recent influx of offers
for help on beginner docume
The Apache Software Foundation is a proud partner of Google Summer of
Code initiative (http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html).
The Summer of Code is a program designed to introduce students to the
world of Open Source Software Development and provide them with
a $4500 award for completing an O
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
What do both projects think which one should become the main app (lenya
or forrest)?
that's a funny question :)
afaik forrest has no workflow, user management etc, so if you need
th
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Probably faster to try turning it on than for someone to type a reply (I
> don't know the answer by the way).
My question was more about hidden side effects that I wouldn't find
through trial and error. But since nobody seems to know I'll just try.
--
Ferdinand Soethe
Tim Williams wrote:
Sent to dev as suggested.
On 5/18/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
Has anyone already documented how to use Slide as a backend to
Forrest? If not maybe some high-level pointers of where to start?
Nobody has documented this, or to my knowl
Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am thoroughly confused by the discussion and can only
> assume that it is a potential issue with the German publishers.
Correct.
> What Ferdinand is proposing to donate to Forrest is just the outline of
> a book. About half of this book is of no interest to a documentati
Note: Perhaps I also have a slightly different view on this in the sense
that I'm not aiming at building and maintaining a collection of
skins but would rather like to have a quick and easy way to see
and learn about other people's skins.
And although I'm not opposed to wo
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 10:08 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
I should have made the subject "attracting skins/views developers
through skin-packages"
Thorsten, does this make any sense or am I going down a dead end here?
IMO part 1 no, part 2 yes.
View development is
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
Hello,
A few days ago I added issue FOR-506 on this topic. This is my original
message:
"Text strings like "Copyright", "Published", and "Search" are
hardcoded into skin files like site2xhtml.xsl. When creating web
sites in languages other than English the web de
David Crossley wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
If you tell the list what your general aim is then
we can see what any legal issues might be. We can also
seek help from the Apache "legal-discuss" mailing list.
It is actually quite simple to describe:
I want to donate t
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> IMO the only thing that we can and should accept is the CSS of Claudia.
> Skins ("old fashion" - the ones we have right now) are horror for
> maintainment (and there are only few that really maintain them). More so
> if they change common skin stylesheets.
I'd like to
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 10:08 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I should have made the subject "attracting skins/views developers
> through skin-packages"
>
> Thorsten, does this make any sense or am I going down a dead end here?
IMO part 1 no, part 2 yes.
View development is different from skin dev
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
I would love to see your skin made available (I too like it a great
deal). However, we need to discuss exactly how to accept this donation
over on the dev list (this mail is copied to the dev list and replies
will be sent there).
Could we please ke
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 15:49 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> >
> > 1. Forrest accepts the skin and keeps it in SVN
> >
> > I am -0 on this. We need to would then be forced to maintain the skin
> > and ensure that it is "correct" in the sense of everything is done the
> > ri
53 matches
Mail list logo
