David Crossley wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
I think I grasped the TR. I didn't grasp that the scope of the
current effort was implementing the entire TR. I thought we were only
focused on the first part -- using XTHML2 as our source. I just
didn't
Ross Gardler wrote:
2) when we detect some other source format then its
input plugin will transform to xhtml2 (e.g. the
Apache document-v* formats). Even html and xhtml1
could be input plugins, though the TR document
has them happening in the core.
The TR needs to change then. The only
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
2) when we detect some other source format then its
input plugin will transform to xhtml2 (e.g. the
Apache document-v* formats). Even html and xhtml1
could be input plugins, though the TR document
has them happening in the core.
The TR needs to
- Original Message -
From: David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: xhtml2 tonights update questions
snip all that good stuff, I'll need it for later /
I wonder if we could do another collaborative work day soon
Gav wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I wonder if we could do another collaborative work day soon.
and take on the whole job.
When you say soon are you thinking before the next scheduled FT ?
Yes, like very soon.
If so, I believe this a good idea in more ways than one,
1. We get on
Gav wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: xhtml2 tonights update questions
snip all that good stuff, I'll need it for later /
I wonder if we could do another
Ross Gardler wrote:
Gav wrote:
When you say soon are you thinking before the next scheduled FT ?
If so, I believe this a good idea in more ways than one,
1. We get on with it and get lots more done.
2. We end all confusion that is building up.
No. The confusion is caused by the
We need to be clear on what we are going to achieve and how *before*
having a Forrest Tuesday event.
To an extent. It is very hard to be clear beforehand.
I agree. Besides, I think FT's provide a unique opportunity for people
to collaboratively explore new directions. This is important,
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
We need to be clear on what we are going to achieve and how *before*
having a Forrest Tuesday event.
To an extent. It is very hard to be clear beforehand.
Yes, it is true we cannot clearly define individual tasks, but we can at
least agree an approach. I think that is
Tim Williams wrote:
When you start reading these issues, it's not as bad as it sounds,
I've got an xhtml page viewed at this point, although it's really
ugly.
Here's what I've done:
o) Changed *.page to use a new pipeline **xhtmlbody-*.fhtml instead of
the old **body-*.html
o) Changed the
Tim Williams wrote:
When you start reading these issues, it's not as bad as it sounds,
I've got an xhtml page viewed at this point, although it's really
ugly.
Great work Tim.
[WARING] I have *not* looked at your work in detail, so my comments may
be way off. If they are just say check the
I'll read the rest of this later but really quickly I don't see how
moving the navi stuff out to a contract (which I agree with btw) is
going to solve my problem. It's not going to change that the internal
plugin xmap has match precedence over the menu.xmap.
I've been thinking we were taking
Tim Williams wrote:
I'll read the rest of this later but really quickly I don't see how
moving the navi stuff out to a contract (which I agree with btw) is
going to solve my problem. It's not going to change that the internal
plugin xmap has match precedence over the menu.xmap.
I'm not sure
On 9/8/05, Ross Gardler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
I'll read the rest of this later but really quickly I don't see how
moving the navi stuff out to a contract (which I agree with btw) is
going to solve my problem. It's not going to change that the internal
plugin xmap
On 9/8/05, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
I think I grasped the TR. I didn't grasp that the scope of the
current effort was implementing the entire TR. I thought we were only
focused on the first part -- using XTHML2 as our source. I just
didn't pick up
15 matches
Mail list logo
