Re: FreeMarker has graduated to TLP!

2018-03-23 Thread Ralph Goers
Congrats! Ralph > On Mar 23, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Lalish-Menagh, Trevor > wrote: > > How exciting! Congrats to all the dedicated volunteers that made this a > reality! > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux > wrote: >> Congratulations Daniel and to all the persons who participate

Re: Moving JBoss FreeMarker IDE (Eclipse plugin) to the ASF?

2018-03-11 Thread Ralph Goers
If RedHat took ownership of the tool then they should be able to take care of changing the license and sending an SGA to the ASF. However, nothing in your email indicates that RedHat has any interest in donating the tool to the ASF. Short of that your only real option is to fork it to GitHub. Yo

Re: Started graduation resolution DISCUSS on general@incubator.a.o

2018-02-26 Thread Ralph Goers
You can prepare the release in advance if you want. You just cannot make it public until after the board gives approval. Ralph > On Feb 26, 2018, at 2:09 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Thanks Jacopo! > > If the board will accept the resolution on 21st of March, we can at > last get rid of that

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

2018-02-05 Thread Ralph Goers
I am confused. Who are we waiting for to do what? Ralph > On Feb 3, 2018, at 4:39 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Good! (And sounds like communication is lacking on the other side...) > Now you aren't red on > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker#reporting. > > There are two other red

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

2018-01-14 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 binding Ralph > On Jan 13, 2018, at 2:31 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Dear FreeMarker Community Members, > > Following the discussion on this list > (dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org) on graduating the Apache > FreeMarker Project from Incubation to a Top Level Project, I start > this vot

Re: Resolution draft for graduation, members

2018-01-08 Thread Ralph Goers
e project and wants to build a community. To me > this makes him a good candidate. > > I am not the most active here so I apologize if my comments are out of > place. Just my 2 cents. > > Cheers, > > Taher Alkhateeb > > On Jan 8, 2018 12:06 PM, "Daniel

Re: Resolution draft for graduation, members

2018-01-07 Thread Ralph Goers
You would probably be better served by having someone else volunteer to be PMC chair. My reasoning for that is exactly for the same reason you put yourself there. You are the most active committer and obviously aren’t going anywhere. Having someone else be chair insures that someone else is stay

Re: Attempting graduation?

2017-12-16 Thread Ralph Goers
ojects/freemarker.html: >>>> Here some dates are year only. >>>> >>>> - https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker: >>>> This has some glitches, like it states "No Release Yet/Binary has >>>> licensing issues"... will have to

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

2017-11-29 Thread Ralph Goers
ch is quite recent. Hence maybe some caution > needed... > > My 2 cts > > Jacques > > > Le 29/11/2017 à 14:55, Ralph Goers a écrit : >> Personally, I don’t see why there should be a problem as long as >> try.freemarker.org <http://try.freemarker.org/&

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

2017-11-29 Thread Ralph Goers
Personally, I don’t see why there should be a problem as long as try.freemarker.org is an Apache controlled domain. You aren’t the only project that has a vanity domain. See www.openoffice.org as an example. Ralph > On Nov 29, 2017, at

Re: Home page content changes - please review

2017-11-13 Thread Ralph Goers
It looks like you only fixed one of them. Ralph > On Nov 13, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Thanks, fixed. > > > Monday, November 13, 2017, 5:13:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> Aggreement s/b Agreement. >> >> Ralph >> >> &g

Re: Home page content changes - please review

2017-11-13 Thread Ralph Goers
t's > certainly better than nothing. > > Monday, November 13, 2017, 12:36:24 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer >> knows for certain the contributor intends for their contribution to >> be Apache licensed. S

Re: Home page content changes - please review

2017-11-12 Thread Ralph Goers
An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer knows for certain the contributor intends for their contribution to be Apache licensed. Simply having a statement in the main README at GitHub with a statement to the effect that all contributions submitted as pull requests are un

Re: Changing official domain to freemarker.apache.org now? Was: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

2017-10-23 Thread Ralph Goers
gt;> 2017-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel Dekany : >> >>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again >>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. Also >>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or again

Re: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

2017-10-20 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :

Re: [DISCUSS] graduation

2016-07-27 Thread Ralph Goers
This project is not in any danger of being “retired”. Ralph > On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Tuesday, July 26, 2016, 6:43:46 PM, Pete Helgren wrote: > >> I lurk as well but use Freemarker pretty much every day in a fairly >> narrowly defined way. I am a little fuzzy o

Re: [DISCUSS] graduation

2016-07-27 Thread Ralph Goers
To answer this question, FreeMarker primarily has a single developer who does most everything when he can. The whole point of becoming a project at Apache was to try to change that. Normally committers are only nominated and elected after they contribute for a while - see http://www.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] graduation

2016-07-27 Thread Ralph Goers
Graduation doesn’t necessarily mean anything, with regards to growth. Ralph > On Jul 25, 2016, at 11:28 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote >> > > Graduation means more visibility to the project that would help to grow, > but we need to be enough to reach the graduation and make the project a > su

Re: Graduation issues

2016-06-18 Thread Ralph Goers
If the graduation vote fails the project would be told why. They would continue in the incubator if they choose until whatever issues there were are addressed. PPMC members usually continue on as PMC members although mentors frequently don’t stay on. Ralph > On Jun 18, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 3

2016-01-17 Thread Ralph Goers
I am also +1 on the release Ralph > On Jan 16, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Those also look fine to me. The artifacts has the new NOTICE files, > and the the sha1 and md5 checksums are correct. > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Saturday, January 16, 2016, 4:34:54 PM, Jaco

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating

2016-01-11 Thread Ralph Goers
Actually, you can deploy SNAPSHOTs from a Jenkins job every day if you want to. They aren’t releases. I believe the only purpose that section serves is to let you verify that your settings are correct and that you have permission to deploy to the repository. Note that what you are deploying to

Re: Greetings

2015-12-18 Thread Ralph Goers
Great! I would recommend you take a look at http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html and http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html . Then you might want to look at https:/

Re: Abandoning Servlet 2.3 support?

2015-10-25 Thread Ralph Goers
ce if > we want 2.3.24 to be part of a 3.x maintenance release, it can't > require any higher.) > > > Sunday, October 25, 2015, 5:23:31 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> Frankly, I would have dropped support for servlet 2.3 a while ago. >> Same for Java 5. Heck Log4j

Re: Abandoning Servlet 2.3 support?

2015-10-25 Thread Ralph Goers
Frankly, I would have dropped support for servlet 2.3 a while ago. Same for Java 5. Heck Log4j just made the minimum version Java 7. Ralph > On Oct 21, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > We will need to call some Servlet 2.4 API-s, and I can solve it > reflection and such, and by com

Re: [VOTE] Drop JSP 1.2 support in 2.3.24

2015-09-22 Thread Ralph Goers
Sorry for being late to the party, but I just wanted to point out that in case you aren’t aware votes are not required for these kinds of things - you can simply start a discussion and see if anyone objects. If someone wants to discuss it it can also get messy as you will mix a bunch of discuss

Re: Preparing poddling status report

2015-08-04 Thread Ralph Goers
> where we have this on https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2015: > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](freemarker) Jacopo Cappellato > [ ](freemarker) Jean-Frederic Clere > [ ](freemarker) David E. Jones > [ ](freemarker) Ralph Goers > [ ](freemarker) Sergio Fernández > >