Re: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-17 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
Sorry... Also, the new implementation will not be statically available and for now the instance is passed into the locations that require it. —Udo On Sep 18, 2020, 2:22 AM +1000, Jens Deppe , wrote: Thanks for this work Udo! Does this ClassLoaderService effectively replace the current

Re: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-17 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
Jens, yes and no. The ClassPathLoader will still be relevant for the ClassLoader mechanisms we require for the non-ClassLoader-Isolated starting of the server. But all the functionality that ClassPathLoader exposes will eventually be replaced with the ClassLoader Isolated capability. I’ll add

Re: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-17 Thread Jens Deppe
Thanks for this work Udo! Does this ClassLoaderService effectively replace the current ClassPathLoader mechanism then? How will one access the service; is there some static reference? Some code examples would be helpful to properly understand how one might work with this. --Jens On 9/14/20,

Re: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-15 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
, -Alberto G. From: Udo Kohlmeyer Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:42 PM To: geode Subject: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal Hi there Apache Geode Devs, (try 2) Please find attached a proposal for a ClassLoaderService. Please review and ponder

Re: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-15 Thread Alberto Gomez
the --experimental-classloader flag is used in GFSH. Is this right? Thanks, -Alberto G. From: Udo Kohlmeyer Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:42 PM To: geode Subject: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal Hi there Apache Geode Devs, (try 2) Please

Re: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-15 Thread Ju@N
Looks good to me Udo, thanks for putting it together!. On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 11:42, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > Hi there Apache Geode Devs, (try 2) > > Please find attached a proposal for a ClassLoaderService. Please review > and ponder on it. > > >

Re: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-14 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
it is to convert something into a persistent service vs creating it as one in the first place. If it's trivial, then no worries. From: Udo Kohlmeyer Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 3:42 AM To: geode Subject: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal Hi

Re: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-14 Thread Donal Evans
creating it as one in the first place. If it's trivial, then no worries. From: Udo Kohlmeyer Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 3:42 AM To: geode Subject: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal Hi there Apache Geode Devs, (try 2) Please find attached a proposal

[Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal

2020-09-14 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
Hi there Apache Geode Devs, (try 2) Please find attached a proposal for a ClassLoaderService. Please review and ponder on it. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Introduction+of+ClassLoaderService+into+Geode All comments are please to be made in this mail thread. —Udo