Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-04-02 Thread Alberto Gomez
vance, Alberto G. From: Barry Oglesby Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 7:34 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers I added some comments to the proposal. There a few concerns, but I like the

Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-03-26 Thread Barry Oglesby
I added some comments to the proposal. There a few concerns, but I like the idea in general. Dan said: I remember someone trying to accomplish this same thing on top of geode with TransactionListener that dumped into a separate region or something like that. I think both Charlie and I have implem

Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-03-26 Thread Jacob Barrett
Great idea. I called out some similar areas of concerns and spit balled some solutions to get the conversations flowing. -Jake > On Mar 25, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Alberto Gomez wrote: > > Hi, > > Could you please review the RFC for "Gateway sender to deliver transaction > events atomically to r

Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-03-25 Thread Dan Smith
> btw what are we voting on? Just curious as I wasn't sure if we were voting for the current proposal or whether we should continue this discussion? Sorry, just +1'd because I like the idea, not to imply we're voting on anything. I thought that's a general apache convention during a discussion.

Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-03-25 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
My vote was to implement said solution. But it is a HUGE +1 to continue the discussion to resolve the issue identified! --Udo On 3/25/20 4:14 PM, Jason Huynh wrote: I put some comments on the proposal on the wiki. btw what are we voting on? Just curious as I wasn't sure if we were voting f

Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-03-25 Thread Jason Huynh
I put some comments on the proposal on the wiki. btw what are we voting on? Just curious as I wasn't sure if we were voting for the current proposal or whether we should continue this discussion? I like the idea of having transactional ops be sent together in a batch if possible and it would be

Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-03-25 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
Hi there Alberto, It's a "-1" from me. I have raised my concerns in the RFC comments. To summarize, whilst I like the idea (I had never thought of that problem you are trying to solve), I don't know how this will behave at scale. Just looking at some of the comments, I think it is safe to say

Re: RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-03-25 Thread Dan Smith
+1 I think this a good improvement to the way transactions behave with WAN! I had a couple of more detailed comments I put on the doc. Thanks, -Dan On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:05 AM Alberto Gomez wrote: > Hi, > > Could you please review the RFC for "Gateway sender to deliver transaction > events

RFC - Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers

2020-03-25 Thread Alberto Gomez
Hi, Could you please review the RFC for "Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to receivers"? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Gw+sender+to+deliver+transaction+events+atomically+to+receivers Deadline for comments is Wednesday, April 1st, 2020, Thanks, Albert