Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

Following up - I gave the plugin a good try, had some help from Dan. No luck getting it to run correctly. (It was last updated a couple of years ago.) Will pursue some other avenues. On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:59 PM, William Markito wrote: > With the docs now in markdown format, it should also b

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

The vote passes with 6 +1 votes and 2 +0 votes: Anthony Baker: +1 Jinmei Liao: +0 Kirk Lund: +1 William Markito: +1 Dan Smith: +1 Karen Miller: +0 Anilkumar Gingade: +1 Mark Bretl:

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

With the docs now in markdown format, it should also be easy to convert markdown to PDF. Here is a gradle plugin that can do that for example... https://github.com/sleroy/gradle-doc-plugin On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:49 PM, John Blum wrote: > Perhaps longer term we should consider moving the doc

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

Perhaps longer term we should consider moving the docs to Asciidoc It is relatively simple matter to convert Asciidoc to PDF. On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jared Stewart wrote: > Sadly just looked at the license for wkhtmltopdf and it uses GPL 3.0. I > believe that would be an issue as disc

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

Sadly just looked at the license for wkhtmltopdf and it uses GPL 3.0. I believe that would be an issue as discussed here . > On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Jared Stewart wrote: > > In the past I have used wkhtmltopdf to build programmatica

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

In the past I have used wkhtmltopdf to build programmatically PDFs from HTML documents. We could try using this to generate a PDF version of the docs in the interim until we can generate a PDF directly from book binder. > On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: > > Its really import

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

Its really important to ship pdf docs because its very difficult to search otherwise. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Joey McAllister wrote: > @Dan: I didn't realize there was a docs link in the top-level README. W

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

@Dan: I didn't realize there was a docs link in the top-level README. We can change that for the next release, and I can look into redirecting geode.docs.pivotal.io to geode.incubator.apache.org/docs/ in the meantime, once the docs are posted there.. @William: We don't currently have a PDF for the

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

I think we should ship the pdf docs. Geode shouldn't point to Pivotal for its docs. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Oct 17, 2016 9:53 PM, "William Markito" wrote: > IHMO, it would be really nice to ship a PDF version of the docs. > > About the e

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

I'm a fan of PDFs, too, for their searchability among other things. There's no process in place, yet, for generating a good-looking PDF from the Markdown sources. Something to put on the to-do list. Right now, HTML format is the best presentation. On Monday, October 17, 2016, William Markito wrot

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

IHMO, it would be really nice to ship a PDF version of the docs. About the examples, if we could package and ship sources only for that module, that would be cool as well. On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > Along these lines, should we distributing the docs with the binary re

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

Along these lines, should we distributing the docs with the binary release? Or maybe just providing a link to them? The README.md shipped with 1.0.RC2 points to http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/ . What about geode-examples? Should that be part of the binary release? -Dan On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:21

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+1 - Checked signatures - Ran gfsh: ./gfsh version --full - Built from source - Verified Commit ID atches with source tar ball - Reviewed BUILDING.md Under 'Build from Source on Windows' in BUILDING.md it states minimum Gradle is 2.12, when the gradle.properites file has 2.14.1. When run with 2.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

@Anil: Without the fix that GEODE-1883 should bring, client caches only have 1 way of setting the security properties: do it via the callback. Once the fix is in, client caches should again have 2 ways of setting the security properties: 1. do it via the callback, or 2. place in a security.proper

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+1 for release... On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > Hi Karen, > > The fix still keeps the doc stating: > "a client will need to set its credential, composed of the two properties > `security-username` and `security-password`." > > What i see is, additional doc about set

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

Hi Karen, The fix still keeps the doc stating: "a client will need to set its credential, composed of the two properties `security-username` and `security-password`." What i see is, additional doc about setting the auth properties using callbacks Am i missing anything? -Anil. On Mon, Oc

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

@Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community time to offer feedback here (which, it looks like, is all positive). William Markito and I were able to build and test a local version of the website with the docs included. Based on the +1s here, I'd like to go ahead and push th

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

+1 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Anthony Baker > wrote: > > > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, let’s > > start > > > hosting them o

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

+1 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, let’s > start > > hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? > > Huge +1! Anything stopping you fr

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

+1 :) Niall On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, let’s > start hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? > > Anthony > > > On Oct 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > The documentati

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+0 With GEODE-1883 being moved to a subsequent release, the just-donated docs are not-quite current with respect to how a client cache may set its credentials for authentication. I put in a fix for this on the develop branch: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/commit/f1df6fc5920d0d1eebd210

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, let’s start > hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? Huge +1! Anything stopping you from pushing the first update and start maintaining it a'la Hadoop: https:

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

+1 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > +1 - I was going to ask about this on the release thread. Let's put them up > on geode.apache.org! > > -Dan > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > +1, It would be great to have this by the time we put the vot

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

+1 - I was going to ask about this on the release thread. Let's put them up on geode.apache.org! -Dan On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > +1, It would be great to have this by the time we put the vote out on > general@incubator > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Joey

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+1 Checked * signatures * maven repo with simple sample app * command line test through gfsh * built the source Checked it with this thing: https://github.com/upthewaterspout/geode-release-check On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:55 AM, William Markito wrote: > +1 > > Checked SHA, signatures,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+1 Checked SHA, signatures, build/run, sample app and command line testing through gfsh. On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 I think we should target GEODE-2004 and GEODE-1883 for a point release > after 1.0.0 > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > >

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

+1 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > +1, It would be great to have this by the time we put the vote out on > general@incubator > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Joey McAllister > wrote: > > > Only a very enthusiastic +1. :) > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

+1, It would be great to have this by the time we put the vote out on general@incubator On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Joey McAllister wrote: > Only a very enthusiastic +1. :) > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM Anthony Baker wrote: > > > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the dev

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

Only a very enthusiastic +1. :) On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM Anthony Baker wrote: > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, let’s > start hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? > > Anthony > > > On Oct 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > >

Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, let’s start hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? Anthony > On Oct 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > > The documentation on how to install and use Apache Geode are hosted > on pivotal.io

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+1 I think we should target GEODE-2004 and GEODE-1883 for a point release after 1.0.0 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > +0 > > This candidate does not include the fix for GEODE-2004 and GEODE-1883. It's > not a must fix though. > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Anthony Ba

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+0 This candidate does not include the fix for GEODE-2004 and GEODE-1883. It's not a must fix though. On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > +1 > > * Verified sha’s > * Verified signatures > * Verified tag signature > * Build and run from src distro > * Checked src distro for b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+1 * Verified sha’s * Verified signatures * Verified tag signature * Build and run from src distro * Checked src distro for binaries * Run some examples from mvn repo * Reviewed LICENSE and NOTICE Anthony > On Oct 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > All, > > This is the second r

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

All, This is the second release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.0.0-incubating. I discarded the first release candidate since my pgp key was missing from the KEYS file. Thanks to all the community members to drive towards this milestone! It fixes the following issues: https://issues.a