I noticed we still have a "configuration" element in the config.xml file.
I am thinking of doing the following for 1.1:
* most importantly, change the "configuration" element name to "module"
to have consistent terminology considering the recent configId changes.
* update cmd line help for --o
David,
1. there's only one resource in the transaction. Well, you can just
call 1pc commit on it. As a special case, if there are lots of
resources, but all but the last one says it's read-only, you can just
call 1pc commit on the last one (skipping prepare). I think it's
sort of obvious this
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1786?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1786:
---
Fix Version: 1.2
Need ActiveMQ v4 to fix this...
> JMS Listeners for protocols activeio, peer and openwire fail to start
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1762?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1762:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
Version: 1.0
1.1
> Create a derby network /embedded XA datasource via admin console fail
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1475?page=all ]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-1475:
--
Fix Version: (was: 1.2)
Resolution: Invalid
(Visible to jira-users)
> Configs needing updated to not include Xerces files in the Reposito
I'll provide some info on the release schedule (can you say end of month :)?
Unfortunately, I'm leaving Thursday morning I think so I won't be there at the BOF. Any volunteers
to present the material ?
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Someone (cough, Matt, cough) needs to discuss the release schedule.
W
Wonderful!
Thanks!!
david jencks
On May 10, 2006, at 6:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further,
I've hooked it up to run every Wednesday at 6am PST. I chose
Wednesday as it gives developers a couple days into the week to try
and
After looking at Toby Cabot's patch (GERONIMO-1507) and thinking some
more I've come up with an offline deployer. What I do is basically
start only the configurations in config.xml whose artifacts match .*-
deployer/.* This is quite easy and seems to work.
There are 2 possible problems at
David,
This is excellent. I think the users will appreciate being able to see new items more quickly. Not
sure if this makes sense but you might do the build at 0300 PT. That way Aaron won't be up early
hammering the build :)
David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates
On May 10, 2006, at 1:17 PM, ludovic orban wrote:
Hi,
I carefully read Mike Spille's XA Exposed articles but there was
something I could never properly understand. I hope somebody here will
be able and kind enough to help me understand what I missed.
The question I have lies in "The 1PC Opti
Hi,
I am playing with Master/Slave recently, it seems when Slave starts up, it
will talk to a Master and the Master starts to send msg/cmd etc. to the
Slave, but when the Slave is down, the Master only deregister the slave,
write an error message like "ERROR MasterBroker - Slave Failed" and cont
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2008?page=all ]
Jeff Genender reassigned GERONIMO-2008:
---
Assign To: Dain Sundstrom
> Deployment of war with config file on classpath root fails due to '!' in url
>
Deployment of war with config file on classpath root fails due to '!' in url
Key: GERONIMO-2008
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2008
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Securi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-436?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMO-436:
---
Resolution: Fixed
This should work now.
> JSR-88: Targets Ignored
> ---
>
> Key: GERONIMO-436
> URL: http://
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1740?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-1740:
-
Attachment: geronimo.patch
Guillaume, This patch contains pom.xmls for modules and configs and
parent-poms. This is for 1.1.
Lot of new
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1666?page=all ]
Paul McMahan resolved GERONIMO-1666:
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Resolution: Duplicate
dup of GERONIMO-1802
> Console issues resulting from configID chang
Hi,
I carefully read Mike Spille's XA Exposed articles but there was
something I could never properly understand. I hope somebody here will
be able and kind enough to help me understand what I missed.
The question I have lies in "The 1PC Optimization..." paragraph of XA
Exposed - Part II
(http:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1902?page=all ]
Paul McMahan resolved GERONIMO-1902:
Resolution: Fixed
This problem was fixed by a patch already committed for GERONIMO-1802.
> Console does not allow editing of Tomcat Connector
Welcome to the list, Sachin ;-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 5/10/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
test:ignore
-sachin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2007?page=all ]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-2007:
--
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
Please take a look at the patch when you get a chance.
> Avoid Classloader warnings generated by BasicProxyManager
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2007?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-2007:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2007.patch
> Avoid Classloader warnings generated by BasicProxyManager
> -
Avoid Classloader warnings generated by BasicProxyManager
-
Key: GERONIMO-2007
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2007
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Compone
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2006?page=all ]
Dave Colasurdo updated GERONIMO-2006:
-
Summary: Deploying an application with an incorrect deployment plan results
in non-functional admin console panel (was: Deploying an application w
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2006?page=all ]
Dave Colasurdo updated GERONIMO-2006:
-
Attachment: badPlan2.xml
Here is another bad plan (badPlan2) that results in a slightly different error
(i.e the deploy panel doesn't refresh and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2006?page=all ]
Dave Colasurdo updated GERONIMO-2006:
-
Attachment: stackTrace.log
badPlan.xml
Myapp.war
> Deploying an application with an incorrect depolyment plan resul
Deploying an application with an incorrect depolyment plan results in
non-functional admin console panel
Key: GERONIMO-2006
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO
On May 10, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/10/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir,
It looks like we now have a BOF, care of you ;-) Is this correct?:
Thursday, 5/18 from 10:30pm to 11:20pm - BOF 9921
Where will the BOF take place?
And when someone finds out, can
Comments inline...
--- Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So my understanding of things is that we have the full set of G 1.1
> plugins for Maven 1, and it would be nice to also have at least a G
> 1.1 packaging plugin for Maven 2 (though we'll need them all in due
> course).
>
> For the
David,
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 10, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > Oh David.. this is really coool !
> >
> > Now explain the significance of 405734. :-)
> >
> > Hope it's not some random number. It'd be nice if that was the tied
> to
> > the revision
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2005?page=all ]
Paul McMahan resolved GERONIMO-2005:
Resolution: Fixed
ConfigIdExtractor was still looking for 'configId' when scanning a plan.
Fixed by svn commit: r405784.
> redeploying conso
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2005?page=all ]
Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2005:
--
> redeploying console EAR fails
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2005
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GER
svn is still down...
Thanks
Anita
--- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, please, upload your code.
> I will try to update them for 1.1.
>
> Thanks,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>
> >Comments inline..
> >
> >--- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Now that we have officially upgraded to TC 5.5.15, I've gone back and
retried the clustering tests and it looks like G1.1 clustering is now
working with TC5.5.15!!
The "Unable to send message through cluster sender" exception that was
being thrown was caused by a problem in the application dep
Yes, please, upload your code.
I will try to update them for 1.1.
Thanks,
Guillaume Nodet
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Comments inline..
--- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Plugins are quite independant of the build afaik (even if they are
used
by the main build).
They could be
On 5/10/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir,
It looks like we now have a BOF, care of you ;-) Is this correct?:
Thursday, 5/18 from 10:30pm to 11:20pm - BOF 9921
Where will the BOF take place?
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61Ehttp
Comments inline..
--- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plugins are quite independant of the build afaik (even if they are
> used
> by the main build).
> They could be written for G 1.1 and updated for G 1.x and have their
> lifecycle decorrelated from Geronimo.
Usually they are a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1405?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1405:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: David Jencks
I believe we have reimplemented everything in this patch, and wish we'd applie
Preprocessed jsps add tons of new servlets. Each servlet takes a
long time to start. I don't know why they take so long to start but
they do. Actually it isn't Servlets specifically, it is a problem
with GBeans themselves.
-dain
On May 10, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I just
I just started with --long, and I've noticed that the console is
taking longer to start than it used to, but this made it darn obvious.
The second highest module startup time is the system database taking
2.1 seconds. The console takes over 11 seconds. Any ideas what's
taking it so long?
Thanks
Hi Thibault,
you should still be able to access the data if you specify the schema in your
query (schema.table)
The id for connection does not necessarily need to be the same that created
data/schema in the db.
HTH
Cheers!
Hernan
Hamelin, Thibault wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently developping an
Someone (cough, Matt, cough) needs to discuss the release schedule.
We should cover the new moduleId syntax (Dain or David J?).
I'd like to spend 10 minutes or so talking about plugins.
We should be prepared with our initial thoughts on Java EE 5 integration.
As for what users want to see, we
So my understanding of things is that we have the full set of G 1.1
plugins for Maven 1, and it would be nice to also have at least a G
1.1 packaging plugin for Maven 2 (though we'll need them all in due
course).
For the Maven 1 plugin, it looks like we have some Jelly code and a
Java implementat
On May 10, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Oh David.. this is really coool !
Now explain the significance of 405734. :-)
Hope it's not some random number. It'd be nice if that was the tied to
the revision number or the timestamp or such significant thing.
It is the svn revision numb
Plugins are quite independant of the build afaik (even if they are used
by the main build).
They could be written for G 1.1 and updated for G 1.x and have their
lifecycle decorrelated from Geronimo.
As they will be very useful for people creating plugins, I think it
could be interesting to write
Title: Problem with DataBase Connection
Hello,
I'm currently developping an application with EJB, and I have a big problem with the connection to the DB2 DataBase.
In the Resource Adapter, I defined correctly the user/pwd for my connection but when I try to get data with my EJB, the database
Geir,
It looks like we now have a BOF, care of you ;-) Is this correct?:
Thursday, 5/18 from 10:30pm to 11:20pm - BOF 9921
If so, should we talk a bit about what we should present, etc?
Anything out there the users would like to have covered?
Thanks,
Jeff
All work related to M2 was halted until the trunk was merged. M2
packaging plugin would require transferring all M2 work to 1.1. I do
not think there are any plans to do it before the merge or at least the
1.1. release. I think using Maven1 will be best at this time. Let's
hear from Jacek..
Th
I think this is reasonable. However, PLEASE keep MagicGBall up to date and working.
I like a working CORBA sample, with both security and no security.
Ted Kirby
Add an aggregator pattern
-
Key: SM-429
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-429
Project: ServiceMix
Type: New Feature
Components: servicemix-eip
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
--
This message is automatically generated b
redeploying console EAR fails
-
Key: GERONIMO-2005
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2005
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.1
Environment: re
test:ignore
-sachin
FYI: ADS API has changed significantly since 0.9.2.
2006/5/10, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'd rather handle the ApacheDS integration separately from the 1.1
release. Fortunately, the plugins work with the Maven 2 repository,
so that issue should be easier.
The main question is how to do
David,
Great job! We have been needing this for a while. Thanks for towing
the line on this.
Jeff
David Blevins wrote:
> All,
>
> I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further, I've
> hooked it up to run every Wednesday at 6am PST. I chose Wednesday as it
> gives developers
Oh David.. this is really coool !
Now explain the significance of 405734. :-)
Hope it's not some random number. It'd be nice if that was the tied to
the revision number or the timestamp or such significant thing.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 5/10/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Awesome! We'
I haven't seen any geronimo plugin for m2 in head.
That whould be very usefull, especially because Geronimo plugins have to
be in a m2 layout, but the only tools to create a car is a m1 plugin.
Any idea ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I'd rather handle the ApacheDS integration
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2003?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMO-2003:
Resolution: Invalid
My bad, no longer in image after a clean rebuild
> Remove geronimo-config-1.1.xsd
> --
>
>
I'd rather handle the ApacheDS integration separately from the 1.1
release. Fortunately, the plugins work with the Maven 2 repository,
so that issue should be easier.
The main question is how to do the build and packaging. If the API is
unchanged, we can build our integration module using our M
Awesome! We've needed this for a while.
It would be great if we could auto link the build and the changelog
to the download site.
On May 10, 2006, at 9:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further,
I've hooked it up to run every Wednesda
While working on a patch for GERONIMO-1896 I noticed that hostname and
port changes I made to the activemq connectors via the geronimo admin
console don't get persisted in geronimo's config.xml, causing them to
revert to their original values when the server restarts.
To fix this problem ActiveMQ
All,
I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further, I've
hooked it up to run every Wednesday at 6am PST. I chose Wednesday as
it gives developers a couple days into the week to try and get
features in that they'd like people to try out. It also gives a
couple days in th
ApacheDS0.9.2 to 1.0-RC2 ?
I have a patch to port the Geronimo part to 1.0-RC2. However,
currently ADS 1.0 jars propagated to maven2 repo only.
2006/5/9, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Consolidated list so far is:
Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4
commons-fileupload
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1518?page=all ]
erik daughtrey updated GERONIMO-1518:
-
Attachment: installer_dev_notes.jar
Unfortunately, I will no longer be able to work on the installer.
I need to move to other, more pressing projec
Hot deployment of welcome app failed
Key: GERONIMO-2004
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2004
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: Hot Deploy Dir
Versions: 1.1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2003?page=comments#action_12378908
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMO-2003:
Strange, i rebuilt yesterday and they are both in the distribution. Let me do
a clean build.
> Remove geronimo-config-1.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2003?page=comments#action_12378905
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2003:
I don't understand. It's gone from both source and output directories for me.
modules/service-builder/src/schema:
geroni
Remove geronimo-config-1.1.xsd
--
Key: GERONIMO-2003
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2003
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.1
Reporter:
Anita,
Could you create a Jira for the behavior you're describing below? It
looks like the application was already in the repository and the hot
deploy caused it to be written in there again, which seems to have
confused it (whereas it probably should have just overwritten it,
unless it was alre
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1818?page=comments#action_12378876
]
Jules Gosnell commented on GERONIMO-1818:
-
It looks like support for this property/fn-ality disappeared between 3.2.2 and
4.0-M4 - it is also not in trunk at the t
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1899?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1899:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: David Jencks
Primarily through Joe Bohn's efforts all but one of the appearances of the
uber-spec jar were alread
69 matches
Mail list logo
