Now on the pmc list.
On 10/27/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July, please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
On Oct 27, 2006, at 5:55 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Jay,
I picked up a new image today (468502) with a clean repo and I was
able to build and run without this error. I'm not quite sure what
to make of your error (esp. if you are seeing it on multiple
systems). I built and ran on Win XP with S
Ok, I took look through where you're going and here's a slightly
altered proposal.
We group the tests with the beans as such:
openejb-footests/src/main/# this is where the beans will go
openejb-footests/src/test/# this is where the client test code
will go
We setup the poms to pa
On Oct 27, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Ted Kirby wrote:
Sounds good. Good luck! Are you posting your presentation slides
anywhere?
Thanks Ted. That's a good idea. As soon as they are finished... ;-)
--kevan
I became a PMC member...
--kevan
On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July,
please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2528?page=comments#action_12445289
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2528:
I think we should move this code into a separate module only if there is
another user for it. It's possible t
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2528?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-2528.
Resolution: Fixed
> Move generic webservice specifc code to a separate builder module
> -
Move generic webservice specifc code to a separate builder module
-
Key: GERONIMO-2528
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2528
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Impr
Jay,
I picked up a new image today (468502) with a clean repo and I was able
to build and run without this error. I'm not quite sure what to make of
your error (esp. if you are seeing it on multiple systems). I built and
ran on Win XP with Sun JDK 1.4.2_12.
One thing I did have a problem w
Please try now. Sorry 'bout that.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 27, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> I haven't changed the test code at all. It is essentially the same as
> it is in the openejb-itests module. Neverthless, here it is.
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-734?page=comments#action_37307 ]
Eric Wood commented on AMQ-734:
---
To add some further clarification. We verified (via logs) that the receive
side broker had timed out the send side broker. Then, wh
The upgrade procedure should go something like:
- mkdir applications/geronimo-dojo/repository/org/dojotoolkit/dojo/0.4
- place new dojo zip into that directory, renaming it using maven's
artifact-version.zip naming convention
- update the dojo versions in applications/geronimo-dojo/pom.xml
- i
When you load a class the vm may execute any static initializers in
that class, and that can lead to Bad Things(tm). Basically, you give
a hacker an easy way to get arbitrary code loaded and executed.
One other issue, is that it is wicked slow to load lots of classes as
the vm must parse t
You have to load the classes to use reflection, static initializers
run when the class is loaded. So you're quite literally loading and
executing completely unknown code while you scrape the classpath for
annotations. ASM parses the class file, but doesn't load it.
-David
On Oct 27, 2006
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone had noticed that a new version of Dojo has
been released?
I would like to help in changing over the 'built-in' dojo library from
0.3.1 to 0.4.
What are the steps that need to be done to accomplish this (Paul?)?
Thanks,
Jay
I wonder if this is an openejb problem? See JIRA 2063: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063
On 10/20/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick,Here is a log with veryverbose option turned on.CheersPrasadOn 10/19/06, Prasad Kashyap <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Here is the ger
Sounds good. Good luck! Are you posting your presentation slides anywhere?
On 10/24/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,FYI -- I'll be giving an Apache Geronimo presentation at the OpenSource Conference in Tokyo. The talk is at 11 AM on October the 28th.
Here's some conference informa
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/27/06, Jay D. McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone else experiencing this? Is there a fix or workaround that
anyone knows about?
Oh man, how can we get to Java EE 1.5 if we keep having troubles with
our own build spec ;-)
Seriously, I haven't seen it befo
I just changed the From address for Jira emails to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This gets it passed the filter that was blocking it and brings it in
line with the majority of other projects in JIRA.
Hen
Unfortunately the Maven2 API is not that intuitive to use/
configure... I'm also not quite sure what the full use of our
repository API is. I'm going to add some logging to try and get a
better idea what is really going on inside.
--jason
On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:05 PM, Jacek Laskowski wro
Interesting. Can you provide detail about your security comment and how asm
figures into this?
Regards,
Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:13:39
To:xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject:
Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we have a major problem with out pseudo Maven2 repository impl wrt how SNAPSHOT artifacts are handled.The real m2 repo code when asked for a SNAPSHOT will consult a list of remote repos, and if matched will download a time-stamped artifact which wi
Do we need a wrapper? Or could we just toss our Artifact* bits and
use the Maven API directly?
--jason
On Oct 27, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 10:57 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
And in short... I have no idea how to fix this. Seems like we
should probably reus
So added a finder for searching for classes that have a specific
annotation, etc. It's there it works and is better than some of the
code i've seen that does the same, but... I still hate it as like all
the approaches I've seen it loads the classes and uses reflection to
determine if the a
It woudl be great to switch the plugin installer to use the Maven code
to interact with the repository (search for matching versions, do the
downloads, etc.). I don't know much about the Maven code/libraries or
I would have done it by now.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 10/27/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL
On 10/27/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current code was supposed to be a temporary solution until
someone wrote a wrapper around the real maven repository.
I've always appreciated working with people who can craft a solid
solution that they used to call 'a temporary solutio
On 10/27/06, Jay D. McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone else experiencing this? Is there a fix or workaround that
anyone knows about?
Oh man, how can we get to Java EE 1.5 if we keep having troubles with
our own build spec ;-)
Seriously, I haven't seen it before so call yourself luck
Hello all.
I just finished rebuilding a fresh checkout of trunk and built it
starting with a blank m2 repo.
When I try to start the server, I get the following error (both on
tomcat and jetty):
Using GERONIMO_BASE: /opt/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.2-SNAPSHOT
Using GERONIMO_HOME: /opt/geronimo-
On Oct 27, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I haven't changed the test code at all. It is essentially the same as
it is in the openejb-itests module. Neverthless, here it is.
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/test-ejbcontainer.zip
I have simply moved it under
geronimo/testsuite/ejbcont
On 10/27/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should we mention the move to a new data center and how it affected the project
-> 6 days without Confluence, other!?
I don't think it's what should be included. I think everybody's aware
of it and it's a ASF matter in general not a project
on pmc around july 31- aug 1.
david jencks
On Oct 27, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July,
please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
me ... back on the pmc
On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July,
please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-980?page=comments#action_37305 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-980:
Now that AMQ-999 is resolved, is this issue now fixed?
> lastImageSubscriptionRecoveryPolicy does not work with wildcards
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-988?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-988.
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied - thanks!
> Thread synchronization error in TcpTransport
>
>
> K
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-995?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-995.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied Rob - thanks again! :)
> An unhandled exception in the TcpTransports' reader thread should close th
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-996?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-996.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by AMQ-999
> IConnection requires Start(), Stop() and Close() methods
> ---
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-999?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-999.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Patches applied with thanks Rob!
I made a minor change to the patch so that the code still works on Mono 1.0; I
I haven't changed the test code at all. It is essentially the same as
it is in the openejb-itests module. Neverthless, here it is.
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/test-ejbcontainer.zip
I have simply moved it under
geronimo/testsuite/ejbcontainer-testsuite/test-ejbcontainer and have
ensured that
Yo!
On 10/27/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July, please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
Committer since Oct 9.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/06, Christopher M. Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was invited to become a committer last week and I accepted it.
Thanks,
chris
Jeff Genender wrote:
> I figured this will get some people's attention.
>
> If you have recently become a committe
On Oct 27, 2006, at 7:34 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/ejb-modules.zip
You may remove the from the top level pom and adjust the
appropriately to build this.
Looks like you have the beans in there. Where is the test code?
-David
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/25/06, Da
I was invited to become a committer last week and I accepted it.
Thanks,
chris
Jeff Genender wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July, please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
The Geronimo assembly (rev 468357) is not using locally built jars/cars (see below). I workaround this problem by building confgs and assembly always offline. If a config needs a new updated jar, I build only that config online.ThanksAnitaP.S. - I had to trim this output, because this mail got flag
Yo!
Jeff Genender wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July, please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
I became a committer since Aug.ThanksAnitaJeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I figured this will get some people's attention.If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July, pleasereply to this thread.Thanks!Jeff
Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new
Servicemix is easily embeddable and can be configured programmatically
or using spring very easily. So we use it to tests for components.
Does that answer your question ?
On 10/27/06, Matthew Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I am working for a very large project and currently evaluating di
able to write marshaller for JBI components
---
Key: SM-724
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-724
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Alper Sogukpinar
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-719?page=comments#action_37300 ]
Alper Sogukpinar commented on SM-719:
-
using org.springframework.jms.listener.DefaultMessageListenerContainer and
service-mix together may be an option
Invited on PMC on August 18th.
On 10/27/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July, please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Anybody has any idea?
Matt
Matthew Huang wrote:
>
> Hi, I am working for a very large project and currently evaluating
> different ESBs platform.
> I am quite interested to ServiceMix's features now.
>
> Is there anybody can tell me how testing is supported by ServiceMix in
> general and to
Should we mention the move to a new data center and how it affected the project
-> 6 days without Confluence, other!?
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Its that time again.
Please reply to this e-mail and put in the items of note from the last
month and plans for the next couple of months
On Oct 26, 2006, at 10:57 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
And in short... I have no idea how to fix this. Seems like we
should probably reuse the maven repo code... but our repo code is
doing some mysterious things that do no map well the the maven
code... like looking in parent configs and such..
Completing the list, I think I included everyone since July. If I haven't pls
chime in.
New committers
- Prasad Kashyap
- Christopher M. Cardona
- Vamsavardhana Reddy
- Anita Kulshreshtha
PMC additions
- Jason Dillon
- Hiram Chirino
- James Strachan
- Bruce Snyder
- Kevan Miller
- Paul McMahan
Is it really since July? We just did a board report last month so I
thought it should only be those added since that report (joining in late
Sep. or Oct). If it really is since July then I'm new to the PMC last
month.
Joe
Jeff Genender wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attentio
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July, please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
I was looking into what is necessary to include common annotations for
Java EE 5 compliance. I think it's pretty minimal but thought I should
throw it out just to verify I'm not missing anything.
I presume that the actual implementation would be including in whatever
JVM we're running on so
On 10/27/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/27/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hit the compile problem yesterday too and used the same work around
> as Vamsi. Then I noticed when r468129 got committed it made the
> following change. I assumed it fixes the probl
I agree that these types of incompatibilities between the maven2 and
geronimo repos are troublesome and I am concerned that there will be
more rough spots ahead as both maven and geronimo continue to enhance
their repository logic in separate beakers. An additional dimension
of this discussion is
Great idea to keep it on the cwiki!
Hopefully cwiki will leave the ER soon. Is not coming back online since the move, there is a JIRA files with infra ( http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1002 )
This are the most recent additions I remember (I'm sure I'm missing a lot).
I'll do some hom
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/ejb-modules.zip
You may remove the from the top level pom and adjust the
appropriately to build this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/25/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great, I'll be looking forward to it.
-David
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Prasad Kashya
Simplify SimpleAuthenticationPlugin Configuration
-
Key: AMQ-1010
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1010
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Broker
That is a great idea.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Team,
>
> Just a suggestion/hint. Some pmc's use wiki to collect input from
> everyone. Example see
> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/BoardReports
>
> Basically when it's time for the board report, usually the 3rd week
> every 3 months. we crea
Team,
Just a suggestion/hint. Some pmc's use wiki to collect input from
everyone. Example see
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/BoardReports
Basically when it's time for the board report, usually the 3rd week
every 3 months. we create a slot in the wiki page and start a thread
on [EMAIL PROTEC
On 10/27/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will you be able to give it a try? I'm a bit confused to have heard
about these problems and I'm sure DJ will appreciate it too (he seems
to be very concerned ;-))
Rerunning bootstrap with an empty repo right now, I'll let you know
how it
On 10/27/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hit the compile problem yesterday too and used the same work around
as Vamsi. Then I noticed when r468129 got committed it made the
following change. I assumed it fixes the problem but I haven't
removed my work around yet to test...
Will
I hit the compile problem yesterday too and used the same work around
as Vamsi. Then I noticed when r468129 got committed it made the
following change. I assumed it fixes the problem but I haven't
removed my work around yet to test...
---
geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-j2ee-schema/src/
Great!
On 10/27/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have re-uploaded the xbean 2.7 release to the m2 ASF repository
at http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/xbean/
The sync process to ibiblio is now automatic, so it should be available on
central repo
On 10/27/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have re-uploaded the xbean 2.7 release to the m2 ASF repository
at http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/xbean/
The sync process to ibiblio is now automatic, so it should be available on
central repo soon (h
On 10/27/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a bit confused by this, geronimo trunk appears to depend on
version 1.1-SNAPSHOT of the schema jar. Can you check that you are
up to date with svn? If this is not the problem please run mvn -X in
the module that fails to build and show it
I have re-uploaded the xbean 2.7 release to the m2 ASF repository
at http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/xbean/
The sync process to ibiblio is now automatic, so it should be available on
central repo soon (hopefully).
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-721?page=all ]
Grant McDonald reassigned SM-721:
-
Assignee: Grant McDonald
> maven plugin creates incorrect jbi.xml if multiple name spaces are used
>
I had a successful build yesterday. Today I did an svn update and
I have run into the same build error. As a temporary fix to get
past the build problem I have copied the xxx-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar over to
xxx-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar . The problem needs to be fixed. I
have encountered this error in Geronimo
I have tried to have another logger class instead of default
mx4j.log.Logger. I've changed it with a setting
-Dmx4j.log.prototype=mx4j.log.Log4JLogger. But it failed because the
name of the class (mx4j.log.CommonsLogger) is hardcoded in
GeronimoLogging. I think one should use the mechanism in mx4j
I'm a bit confused by this, geronimo trunk appears to depend on
version 1.1-SNAPSHOT of the schema jar. Can you check that you are
up to date with svn? If this is not the problem please run mvn -X in
the module that fails to build and show it on the list. Be sure to
include which module i
On 10/27/06, Man-Chi Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
sorry, I am new to geronimo, I encountered error during compiling from
maven2, after I checkout the latest source tree at the first time.
when I check
Thanks for reporting it! It might be related to the recent happenings
at ASF where so
On 10/27/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its that time again.
Please reply to this e-mail and put in the items of note from the
last month and plans for the next couple of months for Geronimo.
Need things like new committers...release plans...community
ongoings...etc.
Regarding co
76 matches
Mail list logo
