On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:06 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Do client-side consumers use the activemq.car? I really don't know
where this is used... if it is for clients, then I can
understand... but if this is only used in the server, then it
should use the vm:// transport for efficiency.
This i
So, the activemq.car is used to make jms connections for mdbs and
other jms resources?
--jason
On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:06 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Do client-side consumers use the activemq.car? I really don't
know where this is used... if
On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
So, the activemq.car is used to make jms connections for mdbs and
other jms resources?
yes. It's kind of near-useless except as an example since it doesn't
include any admin objects (queues or topics) any real app is going to
use. As an
Hi All
Now the geronimo deployment plan for web application is ready for
users.Please find the location here with,
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/geronimo-webxml.html
Through this documents I tried to achieve to provide an better
understanding to the user in different areas of deploying web
Unable to run Maven from Fuse Tooling with Unix based systems (MAC OS X and
SuSe Linux 10)
--
Key: SM-730
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-730
Pr
Unable to run ServiceMix server from Eclipse IDE
Key: SM-731
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-731
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: tooling
En
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2515?page=comments#action_12446235
]
K Wesley commented on GERONIMO-2515:
I will install 1.4.2 today. The default on solaris 10 is 1.5
> load of geronimo/rmi-naming/1.1.1/car failed on Solari
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2526?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2526:
-
Attachment: tomcat.patch
This patch sets the value of J2EEApplication and J2EEServer for tomcat
WebModule MBeans. The servlet MBeans
Yep.. looks like problem with the CommandAgent. The
vm://${brokerName} connector will start up a broker named
${brokerName} if it is not already running. I just need to adjust the
start up code so that the command agent is set with the right
connection URI.
On 11/1/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PRO
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2526?page=comments#action_12446243
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2526:
-
This patch looks ok to me.
> Set J2EEApplication and J2EEServer for tomcat MBeans
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2526?page=comments#action_12446247
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2526:
--
Thanks Jeff!
Anita
"Jeff Genender (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [
http://issues.apache.
>From where did "
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited Try it today." creep into the JIRA comment???
--vamsiOn 11/1/06, Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2526?page=comments#action_12446247 ]Anita Kulshreshtha c
One of the activities to coordinate when finalizing the release is
updating the 1.2 plugin repository catalog at:
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-1.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
to point at a repo where the 1.2 artifacts are published instead of
the snapshot repo it currently points at. For
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2526?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2526.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in rev 469913
> Set J2EEApplication and J2EEServer for tomcat MBeans
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2486?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2486.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
> All plans should use 1.2 namespace
> --
>
> Key
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2515?page=comments#action_12446262
]
K Wesley commented on GERONIMO-2515:
same error:
$ java -jar server.jar
Booting Geronimo Kernel (in Java 1.4.2_12)...
Starting Geronimo Application Server
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2507?page=comments#action_12446261
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2507:
--
The geronimo-jetty-j2ee server is taking 88s vs 33s for geronimo-tomcat-j2ee.
> Starting the webco
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2515?page=all ]
K Wesley updated GERONIMO-2515:
---
Description:
$ java -jar server.jar
Booting Geronimo Kernel (in Java 1.4.2_12)...
Starting Geronimo Application Server v1.1.1
[*-] 0% 2s
I will upload a new version in a few hours.
On 11/1/06, cgallemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find a snapshot for servicemix 3.1, I went to the downloads
section of servicmix.org and clicked the snapshot link
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/se
That's my bad. I replied to the message sent by jira..Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From where did " Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited Try it today." creep into the JIRA comment??? --vamsiOn 11/1/06, Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ ht
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
IMO, fixing the startup time of the web console config under jetty
(see GERONIMO-2507) is a must fix...
Does that mean you are going to fix it?
Happy to, when I have enough time. Does tha
I'm going through and doing some JIRA cleanup, and I've found a problem
with a JIRA that doesn't seem to allow closing. This JIRA
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341
Has already been integrated, but was left open for any potential
additional work. I think this should be closed
I see the "close issue" link. Should I close it for you?
--vamsiOn 11/1/06, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm going through and doing some JIRA cleanup, and I've found a problemwith a JIRA that doesn't seem to allow closing. This JIRAhttp://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341
H
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1697?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-1697.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
This support was added as part of the yoko changes associated with
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
Closed.
--vamsiOn 11/1/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see the "close issue" link. Should I close it for you?
--vamsiOn 11/1/06, Rick McGuire <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm going through and doing some JIRA cleanup, and I've found a problemwith a JIRA that doesn't seem to a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-1341.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> POP3 Implementation
> ---
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1341
> URL: http://issues.a
I upgraded to dojo-0.4 in my local geronimo and the JMX portlet still
seems to work ok. Jay unless you're already working on a patch for
upgrading dojo I'll create a JIRA and check in the upgraded library.
With so many bug fixes and improvements I think we definitely want to
get this into geroni
Paul McMahan wrote:
I upgraded to dojo-0.4 in my local geronimo and the JMX portlet still
seems to work ok. Jay unless you're already working on a patch for
upgrading dojo I'll create a JIRA and check in the upgraded library.
With so many bug fixes and improvements I think we definitely want to
Hi Paul,
I was playing with dojo-0.4 and it looks good. We might have some use
for some of the new widgets plus like what you said there are tons of
bug fixes in this release.
+1 on upgrading to dojo-0.4
Best wishes,
chris
Paul McMahan wrote:
I upgraded to dojo-0.4 in my local geronimo and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona closed GERONIMO-2333.
Resolution: Fixed
> Add JMX Portlet
> ---
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2333
> URL: http://issues.apa
Duplicate bean names (i.e. transportConnector/networkConnector names) in xml
config causes exception in xbean.
--
Key: AMQ-1019
URL: https://issues.apache.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1833?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-1833.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 47.
> Non-public Sun classes dependencies in tests
>
Upgrade Dojo to 0.4.0
-
Key: GERONIMO-2538
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2538
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: console
Slow consumer terminally blocks both client and broker
--
Key: AMQ-1020
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1020
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broke
Fault-messages cause JbiChannel to throw NullPointerException
-
Key: SM-732
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-732
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Compo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1840?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-1840.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 470013.
A slightly different approach was used to fix this. The sun class name is
s
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1826?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-1826.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Duplicate
This is a duplicate of GERONIMO-1840.
> Naming tests might not work on non-Sun VMs.
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2538?page=comments#action_12446320
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-2538:
-
Here is the upgrade procedure (there is a patch attached to handle changing
over the pom.xml file)
1) Downl
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2538?page=all ]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2538:
Attachment: geronimo-2538.patch
> Upgrade Dojo to 0.4.0
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2538
> URL: http://
Is it too late to mention the addition of Dojo and the new JMX console?
Or the beginning of the use of AJAX techniques to make the console more
responsive/friendly?
Jay
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1019?page=all ]
Adrian Co resolved AMQ-1019.
Resolution: Fixed
No other config seems to suffer from this issue other than the one in the
distro.
> Duplicate bean names (i.e. transportConnector/networkConnecto
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2217?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-2217.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
This is working properly now. I suspect the problem was the need to get the
root pom.xml into the repository using mvn
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2538?page=all ]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-2538:
--
Assignee: Paul McMahan
> Upgrade Dojo to 0.4.0
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2538
> URL: http://issue
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2002?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2002.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> OpenEJB CORBA SSL should use Keystore GBean
> ---
>
> Key: GERO
Using "0.0.0.0" in http endpoint clashes with other http endpoints using the
hostname or ip address of the machine, unless port is different
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2421?page=all ]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-2421.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Finally resolved by http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-301. The
correct answer turned out to be "none of the above". Opene
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2483?page=all ]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-2483.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The RMI jar is now on the endorsed class path.
> Yoko support also requires the yoko-rmi jar on the endorsed jars class path.
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2466?page=all ]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-2466.
--
Resolution: Fixed
New version completed and integrated into the specs tree.
> Add a new Java Activation Framework 1.1 implementation.
> ---
Hi all,
I'm trying to reduce the documentation footprint and I was thinking in moving
the translated docs to a separate space.
Visually it wont be any changes, mainly administrative/organizational aspects
will be affected.
What do you guys think, specially you folks doing the translations?
Che
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2538?page=all ]
Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2538.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
thanks for the patch Jay!
> Upgrade Dojo to 0.4.0
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMO-
I'm trying to get the offline deployer back working in trunk, the problem is when starting the kernel with the using j2ee-system as the bootstrap configuration, when locating "META-INF"/config.ser" resources only deployer.jar is located having this resource and thus the j2ee-system config cannot be
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2245?page=all ]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-2245.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
(was: 1.1.x)
Resolution: Fixed
I've not found any strong support for keeping this (or even any use of it
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:50:59PM +0100, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 10/31/06, toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glad you've done it. After the successful build, it's time to get your
> hands wet and start testing! ;-) See how the doco improved lately. You
> won't likely find so much time as
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-733?page=comments#action_37337 ]
Chad Sturtz commented on SM-733:
I dug a little deeper and came up with more information. In addition to the
scenarios stated above, i've tested the following:
4)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2507?page=comments#action_12446371
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2507:
Disabling JSP precompilation in the geronimo-console-standard module reduced
startup time for my admin console
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-733?page=comments#action_37338 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-733:
Yeah, you have understood the mechanism.
It needs to be enhanced but I'm not sure there is a real solution.
If one deploys a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2507?page=comments#action_12446379
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2507:
-
The fact that this is hitting Jetty very likely due to the fact that each
servlet is a GBean. Removing jsp
Yesterday, I tried to build G with mvn alone after removing my local
repository and it works fine... now that the specs and openejb2 snaps
are deployed.
I have not really even used bootstrap in a many weeks... and I think
its time for it to go away.
So... unless someone objects strongly (
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2064?page=all ]
Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2064.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Paul McMahan
> Mail archive links in the Welcome portlet should use the redirects at
> ge
On 11/1/06, toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Jacek, will do. The docs for 1.0 and 1.1 look nice, what's the
plan for 1.2 docs? Will someone clone the 1.1 wiki tree into a
GMOxDOC12 and then people will edit the files for changes? I ask only
because my next step is to get my applic
On 11/1/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So... unless someone objects strongly (and soonish) I am gonna nuke it.
+10
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 10/30/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Thanx. Please see comments inline -
>
>> Couple thoughts on the poms:
>>
>>- the parent would lineage would be
org.apache.op
On 11/1/06, Kanchana Welagedara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now the geronimo deployment plan for web application is ready for
users.Please find the location here with,
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/geronimo-webxml.html
It must've taken lots of time and effort! I hoped to read it all, but
a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2507?page=comments#action_12446398
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2507:
I would check whether the delay is caused by logging. There are often a really
lot of debug messages after st
I'd like to come back to this thread an handle it.
The number of modules is growing and it would be
cleaner to reorg all these modules.
So, unless someone objects, I will reorg the svn source
tree on friday.
On 7/28/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I put together a basic plan (with s
On 11/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to come back to this thread an handle it.
The number of modules is growing and it would be
cleaner to reorg all these modules.
+1
Please let me know if you need any help, Guillaume.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAI
On 11/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: rickmcguire
Date: Wed Nov 1 09:48:44 2006
New Revision: 470013
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=470013
Log:
GERONIMO-1840 NamingPropertiesTest is not compatible with non-Sun VMs.
...
+try {
+//
car-maven-plugin should allow more stuff into manifest classpath
Key: GERONIMO-2539
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2539
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2539?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2539:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2539.patch
Proposed solution to allow adding arbitrary aliased jars to manifest cp.
> car-maven-plugin should allow more stuff in
I came up with a proposed solution and put it in GERONIMO-2539. I think I'm about to need this facility also :-)Take a look, see if it can be improved, see if it works :-)jdillon, does this look OK to you?thanksdavid jencksOn Nov 1, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:I'm trying to get the offli
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1012?page=comments#action_37339 ]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQ-1012:
-
This appears to be a broker issue. When the c++ client gets the exception,
it's detecting there is data on the socket a
On Nov 1, 2006, at 7:14 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
IMO, fixing the startup time of the web console config under
jetty (see GERONIMO-2507) is a must fix...
Does that mean you are going to fix
It isn't really possible to publish a "1.2" release like that. It
would break lots of stuff (like maven) that assumes that there will
only ever be a single 1.2 release. Why can't you test against a 1.2-
timestamp release?
-dain
On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:55 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
One of the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2539?page=comments#action_12446420
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2539:
--
Could you please add a comment to the online-deployer configs's pom.xml
explaining why the server.
On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+/**
+ * @parameter
+ *
+ * Entry name used in replacement for ArtifactItem that is not
resolved
+ */
+private String entry;
FYI, this is not a valid JavaDoc for a field. The description of the
field must come
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2539?page=comments#action_12446427
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2539:
I believe that Sachin's commit in 470169 gets the same basic functionality...
with slightly less cosmetic chan
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-10-30 23:33:33 -0500 (Mon, 30 Oct 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo 1
Ya, this looks bogus...
--jason
On Nov 1, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 11/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: rickmcguire
Date: Wed Nov 1 09:48:44 2006
New Revision: 470013
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=470013
Log:
GERONIMO-1840 Naming
There is a private static final String NAMING_FACTORY_INITIAL =
"com.sun.jndi.rmi.registry.RegistryContextFactory" in the class.
should it be
Should it be Class.forName(NAMING_FACTORY_INITIAL) ?
--vamsiOn 11/2/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL P
79 matches
Mail list logo