I am going to remove the integration-test packaging that we
introduced for the testsuite framework. By having that custom
packaging, we are seeing the following problems
1) running the site goal on that pom
http://www.nabble.com/Are-these-errors-due-to-changes-in-genesis-logging---tf2562523.html
Nevermind :-)
See
http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-custom-packaging-%22integration-test%22-tf2564140.html
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/2/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
components.xml with a new lifecycle for site
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/components.xml
When I used to run the
Ken...here is the information for the Board Report...all comments
included.
Geronimo Project - Board Report
JUGs and Conferences
- JUGs
* Atlanta – Matt Hogstrom
* Virginia – Paul McMahan
* RTP Trangle User’s Group – Kevan Miller
* Gainesville, FL – Joe Bohn
* Orlando, FL - Aaron
On Nov 2, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
components.xml with a new lifecycle for site
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/components.xml
When I used to run the 'mvn -e -X site' command on the test-deployment
pom (packaging integration-test), it used to fail with the following
exception
On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:37 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I am going to remove the integration-test packaging that we
introduced for the testsuite framework. By having that custom
packaging, we are seeing the following problems
Do not remove the packaging, if you feel that you need to use a
near-useless? is it there just as an example then?
--jason
On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
So, the activemq.car is used to make jms connections for mdbs and
other jms resources?
yes. It's kind of near-useless except as
Thanks for the responses David (and the fix for the new Jetty
constructor).
Some more info:
For those building on windows:
- When building Jetty the WebAppTest fails on windows because it reads a
files and the asserts that the file ends with a blah,blah,blah\n.
However, on windows the file
In order to clear things up a bit I made the following changes (this was the result of a conversation with David J on IRC earlier today and Chris). I have copied trunk before the JPA changes into daytrader/branches/1.2 and we'll leave the 1.x stream as J2EE 1.4 and enhancements. svn co -r 469283
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2537?page=comments#action_12446752
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2537:
---
geronimo-util got a shot with committers/tools/copy2license.pl
All Geronimo source files must be
Changing trunk to 2.0-SNAPSHOT and reinstating 1.2 less JPA changes to
branches/1.2
---
Key: DAYTRADER-18
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-18
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1020?page=comments#action_37345 ]
Rob Lugt commented on AMQ-1020:
---
Hi James
I'm using auto-acknowledgements (no transactions). You are correct that the
NMS prefetch default is 1000 messages, and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-18?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed DAYTRADER-18.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Complete
Changing trunk to 2.0-SNAPSHOT and reinstating 1.2 less JPA changes to
branches/1.2
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2537?page=comments#action_12446769
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2537:
---
modules got another shot and are supposed to be migrated (with some exceptions
handled manually)
All
So after being able to bootstrap the j2ee-system configuration, we are running into a NoClassDef exception on XMLObject when attempting to start the gbean-deployer configuration. Comparing the gbean-deployer config to 1.1.1, it looks like a GBeanBuilder bean was introduced in the plan, and this
Hmmm..
The surefire-report-plugin executes only in the test phase. Since we
are skipping it in our custom packaging, it never gets exeucted. So
any other packaging we do will have the same problem unless we
introduce the 'test' phase.
Now, I did hardcode the surefire-report to some other phase.
I checked out the weekly build and found some problems that were fixed
in the 1.1 branch. One is the tomcat logging that was fixed in rev
415233 and another was the database portlet problem fixed in rev
412804. I'm also suspicious that the problem Jason found in the JMS
server portlet could be
OK. Sounds good. o.a.openejb it would be.
The reasons I want to leave the tests in one single module are manifold.
1) That is how they are today.
2) To split them, it would have to be someone from openejb. I have no
idea how they are structured.
3) My top priority now is to get the testsuite
I did not say don't change the packaging, but do not remove the
components for the packaging in plugin-support... which is what is
implied by 'Removing the custom packaging integration-test'.
I still do not believe that it is worth trying to hack up the build
to get `mvn site` to function
Jason,
I still don't have svn karma. Can you please commit this for us ?
Thanx
Prasad
-- Forwarded message --
From: Prasad Kashyap (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org
Date: Oct 23, 2006 4:01 PM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2513) Can't deploy just a plan with
Thank you for that clarification, Jason. I misread that to mean change
the packaging definition. Now I see what you meant.
Thanx again
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/2/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not say don't change the packaging, but do not remove the
components for the packaging
Add dispatch counter to JMX destination view
Key: AMQ-1023
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1023
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 4.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-2271:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy (was: Alan Cabrera)
Security Realm deployed as part of a web app listed as Serverwide
Hi Jacek
My JIRA user name is welagedara
Best Regards,
Kanchana
On 11/2/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/06, Kanchana Welagedara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once I complete this
task I'll create JIRA Issue and will send the patch.(I hope with out
completing this task I
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2271.
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.x)
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed. Rev 470683 (branches\1.1) and Rev 470690 (trunk).
Security Realm
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1023?page=all ]
Jonas Lim resolved AMQ-1023.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in:
apache trunk : r470695
apache activemq-4.0 branch : r470692
Add dispatch counter to JMX destination view
On 11/3/06, Kanchana Welagedara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacek
My JIRA user name is welagedara
Done. You should be able to assign issues to yourself and some other
stuff. Welcome!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
On Nov 2, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I agree that bootstrap has served its purpose and can be eliminated.
Thanks for the work you did on it. It helped us through some rough
times :-)
Paul
Farewell oh bootstrap ... alas, you have served us well (sniff)
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2537?page=comments#action_12446841
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2537:
---
site got it too.
All Geronimo source files must be brought in line with the new ASF source
header
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2537?page=comments#action_12446842
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2537:
---
And docs_nopublish.
All Geronimo source files must be brought in line with the new ASF source
header
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2537?page=comments#action_12446845
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2537:
---
modules got another shot (due to the 4-space prefix we used in the header
that's not been matched the
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
