Reposting this info with more details.
So the 10,000 foot perspective is that we are creating a conversion
tool to convert the prior openejb-jar.xml into the new set of
descriptors (geronimo-openejb.xml, new openejb-jar.xml, jpa entity-
mappings.xml). It is expected that all existing plans
My bad. Being a comparative newbie to the WebSphere admin console I
didn't realise that the classloading strategy was defined at both the
application and the module level! Problem solved.
-Original Message-
From: Grant Mcdonald
Sent: Thursday, 1 February 2007 4:00 PM
To: 'servicemix-dev
Aight, I think I understand why this happens...
When I was building locally and on remote systems, I was using -
Dmaven.repo.local=repository to use a specific repository directoy.
But it looks like something inside of Maven or Surefire is not happy
if this value is not absolute or canonica
I've seen this error before in the OpenEJB build, but it always went
away with a full build and it was in a module with no tests. It's
just wacky.
-dain
On Jan 31, 2007, at 8:51 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone know whats going on? The build is failing because the
surefire plugin is unabl
I was able to track it down to the fact that a WebSphere jar
(com.ibm.ws.runtime_6.1.0.jar) included a lightweight version of the
WSDL reference implementation that did not contain any of the
extensibility elements provided by the WSDL4J implementation.
Unfortunately due to the class clash with th
Appears that trunk fails in the exact same way...
:-(
--jason
On Jan 31, 2007, at 8:51 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone know whats going on? The build is failing because the
surefire plugin is unable to find junit classes:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/TestCase
WTF?
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-12-07 13:03:14 -0500 (Thu, 07 Dec 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo 1
Anyone know whats going on? The build is failing because the
surefire plugin is unable to find junit classes:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/TestCase
WTF? This is relatively new behavior... something has changed in the
past day or so which is causing this... but I've n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2786:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2786.patch
The attached patch fixes this problem.
The DeploymentUtil.un
+1
--kevan
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:49 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3
as requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch: http://svn.apach
+1
--kevan
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:49 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3
as requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch: http://svn.apac
Hi there,
Continue the discussion in a new thread (without Axis2 in the title) as the
questions are not specific to web services. :-)
1) I tried to run a test where a user didn't specify servlet-mapping for the
jaxws test servlet and that didn't go well. (BTW, this is allowed per JSR
109). How
Looks good.
+1
--kevan
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3
as requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch: h
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3 as
requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
branches/geronimo-servlet_2.4_s
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3 as
requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
branches/geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_sp
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3 as
requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
branches/geronimo-j2ee-connecto
I built from core/branches/jsf12
Best wishes,
Paul
On 1/31/07, Don Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul,
Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ?
Don
On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are
The project did not inherit from genesis' project-config because I
could not prevent it from inheriting all the reports. I tried using
for the maven-project-info-plugin and that didn't
work too.
Now I have it extending from project-config but I have to exclude all
other unwanted reports by setti
Going to crank these out now, expect to see some votes for them.
-David
On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
So I don't forget, some commons projects need JDK 1.3 compiled
versions of some of our J2EE 1.4 specs, so at some when I get a
spare cycle I plan to build and put those
Hernan,
Thanks for pointing out this issue. Looks like we definitely have a case
here. Please verify the error you are getting as same given below.
After you have mentioned I tested this sample application in both Jetty &
Tomcat version of the server for 1.1.1 & trunk version (built recently)
but
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler resolved AMQCPP-64.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Looking closer at you sample code, it looks like the problem is how yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler updated AMQCPP-64:
-
Description:
Hi
I am using the activemq-cpp cms api 1.0 release. The problem I am facing i
Hi,
I've read in the forum that release 4.2 will require Java 5 to run.
Will it be the same for the client jars?
Reason being that I have an application running in 1.4 that will require the
bug fixes in ActiveMQ 4.2.
It will be great if the client jars can still run under Java 1.4
Thanks
--
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 to accept the donation
I don't think we need to "incubate" the code as FWIU it is a pure
donation, and therefore goes through the much simpler ip clearance path.
that sounds great, makes everything smoother, we'll work on getting that
taken care of and will update anyt
I just checked in the working converter for CMP beans. There is a
fairly extensive test suite that converts the OpenEJB2 itests,
daytrader and the OpenEJB2 CMR mappings tests. For example, here are
the mappings for daytrader
ejb-jar.xml
---
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incuba
I have fixed and uploaded the samples, the jbi plugin (which i had to
build manually)
and uploaded everything to the incubating repository
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/servicemix/
Distributions are available at:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubatin
The snippet plugin actually works but requires some changes in the
wiki pages.
Previously, the syntax was to use the full uri to the file, for examnple
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/
Now, we need to use a prefix which has been defined as
servicemix
and maps to
[X] +1 lets bring it in, this is great
Cheers!
Anita
--- Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
> through
> incubation (see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
> The final destinatio
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 31, 2007 11:57 PM
Subject: [jira] Created: (INFRA-1144) Move activemq svn repo to its
final destination
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move activemq svn repo to its final destination
---
On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
That's all we want, vote on the donation, then everything else
follows. No point in us changing copyrights and do all the other
stuff until the vote is there.
there is an incubator SVN, if we don't need that for this donation,
the
hello millea
please try to download the lastest 3.1 from
svn repository.
http://servicemix.org/site/source.html
Cordiallement,
Grégoire A.
--- millea1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Howdy,
>
> Just downloaded the 3.0 and tried to run the basic
> example and received the
> message below.
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
through incubation (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronim
On 1/31/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, fair enough... by why are you calling it "samples-parent"?
Usually -parent modules are themselves top-level projects with no
children, which are used to hold common pom configuration.
I'd recommend simply calling the module "samples" inst
Lasantha,
I've been trying to get this app to work on G 1.2. I updated the build script
and deployment plans but still can't get the client to work. I had the same
error in 1.1.1, any chance you could take a look at it?
Here is the link to the 1.2 version.
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/sim
Howdy,
Just downloaded the 3.0 and tried to run the basic example and received the
message below.
Going to the repository url it would seem the 'servicemix' folder (under
/apache) is missing.
Is there another way to build the examples?
C:\servicemix-3.0-incubating\examples\basic>mvn jbi:embedd
Paul,
Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ?
Don
On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
very little trouble (just d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469220
]
Davanum Srinivas commented on GERONIMO-2493:
Closing catch-all items. Since we are using specific jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2493.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Integrate Axis2 webservices
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2492.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Integrate CXF webservices
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469219
]
Davanum Srinivas commented on GERONIMO-2492:
Closing catch-all items. Since we are using specific jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469218
]
Davanum Srinivas commented on GERONIMO-2724:
Already fixed.
> create axis2 config and axis2-deployer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2724.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> create axis2 config and axis2-deployer config folders
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469216
]
Davanum Srinivas commented on GERONIMO-2776:
Fixed in svn revision 501827
thanks,
dims
> Axis2 Integ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2776.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Axis2 Integration - Replace RPCMessageReciever with JAXWSMessage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2789.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M2)
Applied patch in revision
Okay, fair enough... by why are you calling it "samples-parent"?
Usually -parent modules are themselves top-level projects with no
children, which are used to hold common pom configuration.
I'd recommend simply calling the module "samples" instead.
And we may even want to just make a sample
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2789:
--
Attachment: G2789.patch
> allow users to specify something other than services in url-pattern in axi
allow users to specify something other than services in url-pattern in axis2
jax-ws wars
Key: GERONIMO-2789
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2789
The samples-parent was added to have a separate tree for the
individual samples and differentiate them from the
geronimo-samples-archetype child project.
A lot of parent level configuration is applicable only to the samples
tree but not to the archetype. For eg. resources filtering can be
configu
why is there a 'samples-parent' underweight the top-level 'samples'
project? ie...
samples/
pom.xml
samples-parent/
pom.xml
This seems very, very odd to me. Why was this done?
--jason
Um... would it be possible to *not* use this comment style in the
future?
I know that IDEA makes this nice any easy to comment and uncomment
like this, but if you don't use IDEA then its a PITA to remove these
comments. I think its also kinda ugly looking, but thats just me... :-(
--jason
Any reason why this is extending 'genesis' and not 'project-config'?
--jason
On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: prasad
Date: Wed Jan 31 11:58:44 2007
New Revision: 501969
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=501969
Log:
* set parent to org.apache.geronim
ohhh, ok. Thx for clarifying
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Dillon wrote:
Someone edited the files directly on people:/www/geronimo.apache.org, so
that when you run svn co it caused some conflicts.
--jason
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Jason,
what was the problem you found?
Che
Someone edited the files directly on people:/www/geronimo.apache.org,
so that when you run svn co it caused some conflicts.
--jason
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Jason,
what was the problem you found?
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Dillon wrote:
Looks like someone did not follow
Thanks Paul. That sounds really good. I was hoping that we could stay
with Myfaces too but I was just getting concerned based upon the
comments I kept seeing. It sounds like we're closer than I thought.
Thanks,
Joe
Paul McMahan wrote:
I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since th
Temporarily remove yoko jars from the lib/endorsed directory until we have
corba support
Key: GERONIMO-2788
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2788
I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included
their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
to Geronimo. The Myfaces
Usability: jndi name collision error not reported
-
Key: GERONIMO-2787
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2787
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (R
+1
-David
On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
through incubation (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-
dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final destination is to be part of the geronimo devtool
sub
On Jan 31, 2007, at 9:31 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Geronimo uses version 1.0 for geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec where as openejb
uses 1.0-M1. Which version should geronimo be using? Should we make
sure that the other version in not brought in by openejb?
I thought we did, just updated it.
-David
+1 lets bring it in, this is great
Thanks,
Aaron
On 1/31/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it through
incubation (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final destination
[X] +1 lets bring it in, this is great
Best wishes,
chris
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
through incubation (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final destination is to be part of the geron
[ X] +1 lets bring it in, this is great
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
through incubation (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-
dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final desti
On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
through incubation (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-
dev&m=11690620802
+1 to accept the donation
I don't think we need to "incubate" the code as FWIU it is a pure
donation, and therefore goes through the much simpler ip clearance path.
-dain
On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring
[X] +1 lets bring it in, this is great
Cheers!
Hernan
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it through
incubation (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final destination is to be part of the geronimo
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
through incubation (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final destination is to be part of the geronimo dev
Geronimo uses version 1.0 for geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec where as openejb
uses 1.0-M1. Which version should geronimo be using? Should we make
sure that the other version in not brought in by openejb?
Thanks
Anita
On 1/31/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've put the following redirects in on the old confluence site:
RewriteRule ^/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ$
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ
RewriteRule ^/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/(.*)$
http://cwiki.apache.org/
[X] +1 lets bring it in, this is great
[ ] 0 do what ever you want, not my cup of tea
[ ] -1 keep it out of our sight, I have a good reason
Cheers
Prasad
I've put the following redirects in on the old confluence site:
RewriteRule ^/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ$
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ
RewriteRule ^/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/(.*)$
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/$1
RewriteRule ^/conflu
On 1/31/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The conluence wiki has been moved to
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Home
The space is not yet replicated to http://activemq.org or
http://activemq.apache.org (there's nothing atm) and there are still
some problems (the s
On 1/31/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The confluence space has been moved at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/Home
There are still a few problems (the snippet plugin does not work),
and it is not yet replicated to
http://servicemix.org or http://incubator.apache.org
[ X ] +1 lets bring it in, this is great
[ X ] I'm willing to mentor this project while it is in incubation
Best wishes,
Paul
On 1/31/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it through
incubation (see
http://marc.theai
awesome!
On 1/31/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The conluence wiki has been moved to
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Home
The space is not yet replicated to http://activemq.org or
http://activemq.apache.org (there's nothing atm) and there are still
some probl
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
through incubation (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-
dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final destination is to be part of the geronimo devtool
subproject.
(
Whoops...I might also add...
[X] I'm willing to champion the effort while it is in incubation
But...I am not sure I am allowed to :/
If I can, I will :-)
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
> +1 lets bring it in
>
> [X] I'm willing to mentor this project while it is in incubation
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
+1 lets bring it in
[X] I'm willing to mentor this project while it is in incubation
Jeff
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it through
> incubation (see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
> The final
The pom.xml file in geronimo-openejb has inconsistent newlines. I am
unable to set svn:eol-style for this file.
Thanks
Anita
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.
[X] +1 lets bring it in, this is great
On 1/31/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it through
incubation (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final destination is to be part of
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it through
incubation (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116906208022256&w=2)
The final destination is to be part of the geronimo devtool subproject.
(see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=116958894929809&
Jason,
what was the problem you found?
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Dillon wrote:
Looks like someone did not follow instructions when updating the site...
:-(
I've fixed this, will take a bit to roll out.
--jason
On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
hi,
There is a some unnece
Kevan,
Yes, it's on my TODO-CLEANUP list :) We should be able to use
geronimo-schema-jee_5 instead.
thanks,
dims
On 1/21/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Added: geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-axis2/src/main/
> generat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2675.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M2
> Fix geronimo assemblies
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2723.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-beta1)
2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469026
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2723:
--
fixed in rev 496305, 496084, 495896, 495635, and 4949
Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been
weeks since My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap
back as soon as My Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for
the beta, and if we're going to do it, better now than later.
On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 P
It seems I have forgot to upgrade the servicemix version property in the root
pom, so that the examples are still in 3.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.
I will recut the release now :-(
On 1/30/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have uploaded the servicemix 3.1 release to the incubating
repos
Hi Joe, I've asked a couple questions on the MyFaces devlist tonight to
hopefully address some of your questions. First, I've asked for assistance
getting my local MyFaces build working again (so we can at least have
something to start using for TCK testing). And secondly I've asked for a
rough
Hi
I have a web application that uses FORM login. I would like to have a filter
to be declared for j_security_check service so that I can perform some
loging tasks. Is it allowed in Geronimo/Tomcat?
I tried with the below tags but filter will not be called..! Any help on
this?
Page Request Time
Looks like someone did not follow instructions when updating the
site... :-(
I've fixed this, will take a bit to roll out.
--jason
On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
hi,
There is a some unnecessary information displayed in the http://
geronimo.apache.org/contributors
The confluence space has been moved at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/Home
There are still a few problems (the snippet plugin does not work),
and it is not yet replicated to
http://servicemix.org or http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix,
but hopefully it will be solved soon.
Plea
hi,
There is a some unnecessary information displayed in the
http://geronimo.apache.org/contributors.html link (looks like a SVN
confliction) :-D .
Thanks,
Lasantha
Actually, the version used is more of a snapshot on 4.1.1.
It fixes a critical bug for using the JCA flow in servicemix.
4.1 has been released some time ago.
On 1/31/07, Renaud Bruyeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Just a note: *everyone* is encouraged to download, try and
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Just a note: *everyone* is encouraged to download, try and vote,
not only developers or PPMCers (thought their vote would be non-binding).
I see that AMQ 4.1 is not final (and therefore a snapshot is included in
SM 3.1) - do you have a timeline on a 4.1 release?
- Re
95 matches
Mail list logo
