Two exchanges with the same dynamic endpoint processed at the same lead to an
exception
Key: SM-984
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-984
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Freeman Fang updated SM-939:
Attachment: patch0627.txt
patch for CXF bc to handle external cusumer request.
CXF based Service Engine
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-982.
Resolution: Fixed
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=550791
URL:
why not update cimero?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/cimero-tools-tf3989006s12049.html#a11326531
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[snip]
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Jean-Sebastien said that the apis are quite stable now, so I guess
the best way would be upgrade to the latest released version.
Maybe Jean-Sebastien can provide more inforamtions here.
Imo, the tuscany code has changed so much so that it may be
better to try
You need to send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/27/07, Dustin Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
I have a BPEL SU deploying from a SA and it works good, except I have yet
to get a doc into it. Im sure I will get it..
I followed the servicemix example for the loanbroker BPEL SU. I
dissassembled it
and then created my bpel SU exactly how it was.
hgkrt wrote:
You can find the sun
Spring stale version in 2.0-M6-rc1
--
Key: GERONIMO-3265
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3265
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects
OpenEJB trunk at 551087
Geronimo Revision: 551087 built with tests included
See the full build-0400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070627/build-0400.log
[INFO] Retrieving previous build number from apache.snapshots
Uploading:
scp://people.apache.org/www
I see the following constructor:
public RealMBeanServerReference(String mbeanServerId) throws
MBeanServerNotFound {
ArrayList servers = MBeanServerFactory.findMBeanServer
(mbeanServerId);
if (servers.size() == 0) {
mbeanServer =
On 6/27/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the following constructor:
public RealMBeanServerReference(String mbeanServerId) throws
MBeanServerNotFound {
ArrayList servers = MBeanServerFactory.findMBeanServer
(mbeanServerId);
if ( servers.size() == 0) {
On 6/27/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the following constructor:
public RealMBeanServerReference(String mbeanServerId) throws
MBeanServerNotFound {
ArrayList servers =
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39544
]
Gert Vanthienen commented on SM-939:
Applied and tested the second patch: everything compiles and tests run without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508547
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-1265:
1) Yes, the Schema version needs updating, which I'd vote for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-150.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
errant dependency in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508550
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3265:
BTW - Spring is only being included for WADI, which is only in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
This should be fixed now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508555
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-3265:
I agree with Donald that including spring in the geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-2757.
Resolution: Fixed
Jason, I'm going to close this issue, so if there are additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508560
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149:
--
Yes, it works fine. I checked it with
Sachin,
I've been digging into documentation on WTP and Eclipse plug-ins in general
over the last few days, and I am wondering what specifically you have in
mind with this approach. Based on what you have said, the best solution I've
been able to think of is perhaps adding an additional 'target
On Jun 27, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
The other (perhaps simpler) idea for a UI integration I came up
with doesn't necessarily involve any WTP pieces, as it would be to
simply have a window or menu available that would have buttons/
options to run the three components and show
This constructor is for the case when you know the agent id. There
used to be a case where we created an MBeanServer and then referenced
it later. In that case, we knew the agent id, so to guarantee that
we got the same mbean server, I wrote this code.
I'm not sure it is used anymore.
Kit Plummer
Advanced Programs
Raytheon Missile Systems
520.360.4729 (cell)
520.545.9346 (desk)
kitplummer (im)Thanks again Jean-Sebastian.
At this point I think Guillaume is correct - we need to look at the SE.
I'm _guessing_ that the current TucsanyRuntime class gets simplified,
or replaced
Having a j2g migration target runtime wouldn't really be the right
thing to do. A target runtime is basically a Eclipse ClassPath
Container that gets added to your project that defines your project's
JRE as well as the set of runtime jars that are needed to compile
your application for a
Enhance attributes schema (relates to config.xml)
-
Key: GERONIMO-3266
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3266
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-3266:
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
Parent: GERONIMO-1265
Enhance
Does anyone have anything else that they think should be added to this
schema?
If I'm going to have my fingers in it - may as well include any future
changes now.
The implementation can come later, but having the schema changed now
will prevent concerns of
schema incompatibility and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-1265:
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1.2)
(was: 1.1.x)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-1808:
Affects Version/s: 2.0-M7
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
Is there another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2835:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0-M4)
(was: 2.0-M2)
Naming lookup fails. Reported error for a different name than requested
Key: GERONIMO-3267
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3267
Project: Geronimo
On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
In order to (hopefully) simplify finding where the increase in
footprint size comes from, I made a new page on the wiki:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/TOw
Jay
Jay, this is excellent. Clearly the pesky repository is a major
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508708
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3240:
-
What do you mean the driver works properly? sounds like a bad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508711
]
Viet Hung Nguyen commented on GERONIMO-3240:
I am not sure if it is a bad dependency because the Test
Matt, Jay,
The repository shifted from repository/geronimo to repository/o.a.g
from v1.2 onwards. We'd have to compare it against that directory to
get a good picture.. I added the same comments to your wiki page.
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-05-31 12:21:22 -0400 (Thu, 31 May 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo
On Jun 26, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Was just going on Kevan's response to YunFeng, that we shouldn't be
using printStackTrace() in the code -
http://www.nabble.com/Why-printStackTrace%28%29-in-the-source-
codes-tf3975719s134.html
I don't have a problem with logging the stack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3262:
---
Attachment: geronimo-3262.patch
The toggling method through the jsp does not work
40 matches
Mail list logo
