Re: [BUILD] Trunk: Failed for Revision: 569543

2007-08-24 Thread Donald Woods
Should be fixed with Rev569598. -Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OpenEJB trunk at 569540 Geronimo Revision: 569543 built with tests skipped See the full build-1800.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070824/build-1800.log Downloading: http://people.apache.org

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3424) Fatal error in geronimo-service-builder during copy-xmlbeans-schemas on windows

2007-08-24 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522703 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-3424: This is directly related to this issue with the groovy-maven-plug

Re: Now that we released...how about 2 more...

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more TCK runs? > > Both are "released" -- it's just a matter of configuration. You want 2 > additional assemblies with these configured by default available

Re: removal of spring dependencies from cxf module

2007-08-24 Thread Kevan Miller
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Kevan, I'm out on vacation all next week but I was planning to take a look at this issue right after I get back. My intention was to get it done for the 2.0.2 release. Cool. That'd be great! --kevan

Re: Updating the WebSite for 2.0.1

2007-08-24 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
I think we should exclude these packages (some coming from applications) from the docs: org.apache.geronimo.console.* checkbox colors compressionFilters dates error examples filters jsp2.examples jsp2.examples.el jsp2.examples.simple

Re: Now that we released...how about 2 more...

2007-08-24 Thread Kevan Miller
On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more TCK runs? Both are "released" -- it's just a matter of configuration. You want 2 additional assemblies with these configured by default available for download? Or are you int

[BUILD] Trunk: Failed for Revision: 569543

2007-08-24 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 569540 Geronimo Revision: 569543 built with tests skipped See the full build-1800.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070824/build-1800.log Downloading: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/tomcat/catalina-ha/6.0.13

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3115) MDB pool size should be able to be configurable in openejb-jar.xsd

2007-08-24 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3115: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Wish List) 2.1 2.0.x > MDB

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2971) Auto bind resources to Global JNDI

2007-08-24 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2971: --- Fix Version/s: 2.1 2.0.x > Auto bind resources to Global JNDI > ---

Re: ServiceMix 4.0

2007-08-24 Thread Terry Cox
Feel free to let me know when this is scheduled and I will try and attend. Terry

Re: removal of spring dependencies from cxf module

2007-08-24 Thread Jarek Gawor
Kevan, I'm out on vacation all next week but I was planning to take a look at this issue right after I get back. My intention was to get it done for the 2.0.2 release. Jarek j On 8/24/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've run into multiple issues caused by the dependency of our cxf

Re: removal of spring dependencies from cxf module

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Kevan, IIU the reason you are asking, removal of the Spring dependencies from CXF would appear to be a band aid and temporary fix to the real issue. Is this about the Spring versioning and different versions getting loaded? (If not then never mind) Jeff Kevan Miller wrote: > We've run into multi

removal of spring dependencies from cxf module

2007-08-24 Thread Kevan Miller
We've run into multiple issues caused by the dependency of our cxf module on Spring. Jarek, you've mentioned that it's possible to switch from Spring- based configuration of CXF to, hmm, some other form of configuration (xml/programmatic?). How hard would this be? Could we get this done fo

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3421) ClassFinder classloader problems cause deployer to hang

2007-08-24 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3421. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1 Committed revision 569528 in 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT Comm

Re: Updating the WebSite for 2.0.1

2007-08-24 Thread Hernan Cunico
With a lot of help from Prasad I got the javadocs built on my machine. I created a custom style sheet and frameset. I just committed the 120+ Mb to the web site and it should for your review soon at http://geronimo.apache.org/apidocs/2.0.1/ If you guys are OK with these then I'll go ahead and u

Re: 2.0.1 Maven artifacts deployed

2007-08-24 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Able to download from remote M2 repos. Thanks Matt. Vamsi On 8/25/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I put the 2.0.1 artifacts into the repo at Apache this morning and > they should be propagating if they haven't already. I was able to > build 2.0.1 after deleting my geronimo grou

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3401) Stop of module from "System Modules" in console should warn user of destructive action

2007-08-24 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522629 ] Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3401: I've done some more investigation into this to discover the other system

Ready to remove EJB 2.1 components from DayTrader 2.0 (trunk)

2007-08-24 Thread Christopher Blythe
All, I finally have all of the EJB 2.1 components pulled from trunk and have converted DayTrader 2.0 over to be Java EE 5 only. I have functionally tested as many of the operational modes and primitives that I can think of and am ready to commit the changes. Here is a high-level summary of the ch

[jira] Reopened: (GERONIMO-3401) Stop of module from "System Modules" in console should warn user of destructive action

2007-08-24 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Bohn reopened GERONIMO-3401: Given Matt's change to make this an improvement and the severe impact of the problem on a potential

2.0.1 Maven artifacts deployed

2007-08-24 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I put the 2.0.1 artifacts into the repo at Apache this morning and they should be propagating if they haven't already. I was able to build 2.0.1 after deleting my geronimo group in my local m2 repo. Let me know if there are issues.

Re: OpenEJB reconfiguring log4j settings in trunk?

2007-08-24 Thread David Blevins
Thanks for reporting this. We'll have to find a way to disable that functionality. There's some work being done on that code now, so as soon as those patches are committed we can add some more to make it so it can be disabled. -David On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: I th

Re: deploy and undeploy a gbean

2007-08-24 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
BTW, It's a user question so you'd be better off sending it to the user mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing-lists.html). Ops, I thought the dev-list is for developing stuff. I will close this thread an "reopen" it under the user list. Please ignore this o

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141) Installation/Activation of other Plugins fail after installing Devtools plugin

2007-08-24 Thread Johannes Weberhofer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522587 ] Johannes Weberhofer commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141: -- Thank you! The latest unstable

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 and federation (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-24 Thread Kit Plummer
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So if i understand you correctly, you are mostly concerned of enhancing > the JMS flow in the following areas: >* avoid ping/pong and lower bandwidth requirement >(avoid sending the whole exchange and only send the actual data)

OpenEJB reconfiguring log4j settings in trunk?

2007-08-24 Thread Jarek Gawor
I think some OpenEJB code in trunk is reconfiguring the log4j settings. For example, when I start the server (with logging enabled) first I see nicely formatted log messages (i.e.) but after some OpenEJB code is loaded the log message format changes to . When I enable debugging for log4j I se

Re: Server monitoring and management

2007-08-24 Thread Paul McMahan
Erik, this is some very interesting work. Thanks for posting all these details. Like Anita's comment in GERONIMO-3441, I'm wondering whether or not it would make sense to implement these new capabilities more tightly with the JMX capabilities already in the server. I don't have her dep

Re: Adding j2g to site

2007-08-24 Thread Hernan Cunico
If we have some working tool that facilitates migrating to Geronimo I think it's definitively worth mentioning on the main web site. It seems to me that a place somewhere closer to the dev tools subproject would be a better fit. I see there are two documents on the wiki (for Geronimo 1.1 and 2.

Re: JSR77 monitoring subject

2007-08-24 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
--- Viet Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Anita, > > I am really happy that you looked at the monitoring stuff. I looked > into > your suggestion to use the JSR-77 stuff that you have been working > on. It > seems to be a convenient way of pulling data from an abstract object. > Can > you

Re: ServiceMix 4.0

2007-08-24 Thread Guillaume Nodet
On 8/24/07, Adrian Co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this is the right forum to bring this up, but I was > wondering if this is a good opportunity to migrate some of servicemix's > infra to newer version. > > i.e. > > 1. Use slf4j as the logging framework. (http://www.slf4j.org/) -> btw,

Re: ServiceMix 4.0

2007-08-24 Thread Adrian Co
Not sure if this is the right forum to bring this up, but I was wondering if this is a good opportunity to migrate some of servicemix's infra to newer version. i.e. 1. Use slf4j as the logging framework. (http://www.slf4j.org/) -> btw, I'm not sure if its a better option, but I did hear some

Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-24 Thread Adrian Co
I'm interested too. Brian O'Neill wrote: Yes. I'm in. -brian On 8/24/07, Gordon Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I too would like to listen in. Regards, Gordon Daryl Richter wrote: On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote: Any other people interested ?

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3401) Stop of module from "System Modules" in console should warn user of destructive action

2007-08-24 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522550 ] Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3401: I started to look into this ... and I think the issue is even worse than

Now that we released...how about 2 more...

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more TCK runs? Jeff

Now that we released...how about 2 more...

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more TCK runs? Jeff

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-08-24 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522548 ] Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2964: Too bad this fell off the radar for 2.0, it's a useful patch. I

Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-24 Thread Brian O'Neill
Yes. I'm in. -brian On 8/24/07, Gordon Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I too would like to listen in. > > Regards, > Gordon > > Daryl Richter wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote: > > > > > >> Any other people interested ? > >> > >> > > > > I wouldn't mind listening

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3442) Tomcat exception reports reference non-existent log files

2007-08-24 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
Tomcat exception reports reference non-existent log files - Key: GERONIMO-3442 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3442 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-08-24 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12480820 ] pmcmahan edited comment on GERONIMO-2964 at 8/24/07 7:20 AM: - Are you interested i

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-08-24 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12480820 ] pmcmahan edited comment on GERONIMO-2964 at 8/24/07 7:20 AM: - Are you interested i

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3401) Stop of module from "System Modules" in console should warn user of destructive action

2007-08-24 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-3401: -- Assignee: Joe Bohn > Stop of module from "System Modules" in console should warn user of >

Re: [Fwd: Re: building geronimo-2.0-rc1]

2007-08-24 Thread Jason Dillon
It does appear that File.toURL() produces a URL with spaces, while File.toURI().toURL() correctly encodes the spaces with %20. Seems very odd that File.toURL() doesn't do that internally, but eh... --jason On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: I am seeing this error o

Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-24 Thread rs d
I would like to attend this even. Please let me know the details. On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any other people interested ? > > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Kit Plummer wrote: > > > I'd be up for a few chat sessions! > > > > On 8/23/07,

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 and type converters

2007-08-24 Thread Nodet Guillaume
On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:48 PM, James Strachan wrote: I thought I'd spin up another thread on this... On 8/23/07, Brian O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/22/07, Nodet Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Exchanges can be created using the Channel#createExchange method. The only change I'd

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3427) STMP login fails if server sends multiple lines of response back from initial connection.

2007-08-24 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-3427. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1 Committed revision 569336. > STMP login fails i

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3383) "Connect" button on LDAP Viewer portlet just listens on port "1389" ,not 10389

2007-08-24 Thread Song (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Song closed GERONIMO-3383. -- Fixed > "Connect" button on LDAP Viewer portlet just listens on port "1389" ,not > 10389 > --