Re: ServiceMix 4.0 api

2007-08-28 Thread Nodet Guillaume
Btw, I have uploaded the site for the whole project which is easier to manage. http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-4.0-SNAPSHOT/ Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote: I've refactored a few things in the api and introduced back the listeners

Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-28 Thread Piotr Bzdyl
Hi, I would also like to participate in this session. When are you going to send data about the location of the IRC session? I have also another question: could you recommend any easy in use IRC client (for Windows preferably)? I haven't been using IRC (except one or two times). Best regards,

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 api

2007-08-28 Thread Nodet Guillaume
I have committed a simple test showing how to expose an endpoint and how to communicate with it. See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/branches/ servicemix-4.0/core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/core/ IntegrationTest.java How does it sounds ? Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

Re: ServiceMix 4.0

2007-08-28 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Thanks Chris ! It seems like the experts have answered... So i guess we will switch to slf4j :-) Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On 8/28/07, Chris Custine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are correct about OSGi having more control over classloaders, but in the case of JCL things are a little different.

Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-28 Thread Nodet Guillaume
On Aug 28, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Piotr Bzdyl wrote: Hi, I would also like to participate in this session. When are you going to send data about the location of the IRC session? See http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp? post=12323536framed=yskin=12049 We will use the standard IRC channel:

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 api

2007-08-28 Thread Gordon Dickens
Hello Guillaume, I am getting a page not found with the javadoc site. Regards, Gordon Nodet Guillaume wrote: I've refactored a few things in the api and introduced back the listeners and flows. For those who prefer to read javadoc, take a look at:

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 api

2007-08-28 Thread Nodet Guillaume
Yeah, i moved it. Try http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-4.0-SNAPSHOT/ The direct link to the api is: http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-4.0-SNAPSHOT/ org.apache.servicemix.api/apidocs/index.html Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Gordon Dickens

Re: IRC session

2007-08-28 Thread rs d
+3 ok. On 8/28/07, Kit Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/28/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately I will be traveling until Friday evening. What about moving it to Monday instead at the same hour ? 3 pm GMT,

Re: New GShell-based Geronimo Server launcher now in server/trunk

2007-08-28 Thread Jason Dillon
On Aug 27, 2007, at 8:28 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: I wanted to see how much Jason really really luvs Windows. So I began trying GShell on that OS :-) First, I was surprised it even had batch files to support Windows users. Thanx Jason. You really have gone out of your way :-)... Just

Re: New GShell-based Geronimo Server launcher now in server/trunk

2007-08-28 Thread Jason Dillon
Well, I'm not sure why you are seeing that evil NCDFE still... though I did find a wee bug in the --help/-h processing for the start-server command. Basically what you tried is not a valid option to the command, ie start-server help is a syntax error. Instead you probably wanted to say

Re: Adding j2g to site

2007-08-28 Thread Jason Warner
Matt, Feature-wise, I think it'd be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but I'd rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox. -- Jason Warner On 8/27/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik, Jason and Viet. This is really good. Since we're making a SNAPSHOT available is

Re: Adding j2g to site

2007-08-28 Thread Erik B. Craig
Seconding Jason's take on this. On 8/28/07, Jason Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt, Feature-wise, I think it'd be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but I'd rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox. -- Jason Warner On 8/27/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Joe Bohn
GERONIMO-3401 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401 ) records a problem where it is possible for the user to cripple the web console, the server or both with 1 or 2 mouse clicks. When stopping some system-modules such as the following from the web console, the web console

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Erik B. Craig
Joe, I did actually not-so-gracefully stumble into this previously, so I do know the pain it can cause. I think perhaps the best behavior in this situation might be to not only prevent removal of components that would cripple the console, but also display a prompt when it is attempted saying

Re: Adding j2g to site

2007-08-28 Thread Viet Nguyen
let's move it to dev tools first, +1

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-188) devtools\eclipse-plugin\assembly\src\main\assembly\site.xml does not look like it has svn keyword properties set

2007-08-28 Thread Ted Kirby (JIRA)
devtools\eclipse-plugin\assembly\src\main\assembly\site.xml does not look like it has svn keyword properties set Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-188 URL:

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-188) devtools\eclipse-plugin\assembly\src\main\assembly\site.xml does not look like it has svn keyword properties set

2007-08-28 Thread Tim McConnell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-188: --- Assignee: Tim McConnell

Re: ServiceMix 4.0

2007-08-28 Thread Chris Custine
Guillaume, No problem... I think you will be happy with this choice. Also to clarify something important, I really encourage you to replace commons-logging-1.x.jar with jcl14-over-slf4j which implements the commons-logging interfaces and maps them to slf4j static binding. This will solve the

Re: New GShell-based Geronimo Server launcher now in server/trunk

2007-08-28 Thread Erik B. Craig
Oh man, Gshell is looking to be pretty sweet, awesome work Jason. One thing that would definitely be cool is implementing SSH into it, and I did notice there's already a Jira for that, I'm sure I can brainstorm up a few other additions given time... want a little help on the side? =) On 8/21/07,

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3446) Improperly configured JRE_HOME or JAVA_HOME environment variables can cause server failure

2007-08-28 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
Improperly configured JRE_HOME or JAVA_HOME environment variables can cause server failure -- Key: GERONIMO-3446 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3446

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread David Jencks
I don't like prohibiting people from doing stuff because we think we know better. I think there are valid reasons to stop and uninstall most of these modules, although you may need to be an expert to be able to start the server afterwards. How about if for both stop and uninstall we show

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Aaron Mulder
I guess we could also disable stop and undeploy for the system modules and have an expert mode checkbox or something on the screen to enable them again. That ought to be clue enough. :) Thanks, Aaron On 8/28/07, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It probably would still be good to

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Aaron Mulder
It probably would still be good to have some text like WARNING: only expert users will be able to restart the server after this is done. Just seeing a list of components to be stopped won't necessarily clue in the average user to the potential impact... But of course we'd only want to display

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3447) Tuscany plugin for Geronimo

2007-08-28 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
Tuscany plugin for Geronimo --- Key: GERONIMO-3447 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3447 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: public (Regular issues)

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3447) Tuscany plugin for Geronimo

2007-08-28 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523327 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3447: --- Initial code drop from work in sandbox in

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Joe Bohn
David Jencks wrote: I don't like prohibiting people from doing stuff because we think we know better. I think there are valid reasons to stop and uninstall most of these modules, although you may need to be an expert to be able to start the server afterwards. Yes, I see your point ... and

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Joe Bohn
Both good suggestions. Thanks! Joe Aaron Mulder wrote: I guess we could also disable stop and undeploy for the system modules and have an expert mode checkbox or something on the screen to enable them again. That ought to be clue enough. :) Thanks, Aaron On 8/28/07, Aaron Mulder

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I like that idea. Keep people safe but let them blaze on if they so desire. On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: I guess we could also disable stop and undeploy for the system modules and have an expert mode checkbox or something on the screen to enable them again. That ought

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Matt Hogstrom
One other thought...perhaps we could play an audio clip of a shotgun or other firearm action being moved to suggest the consequences of hitting enter :) On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: I guess we could also disable stop and undeploy for the system modules and have an

Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-28 Thread Daryl Richter
On Aug 28, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote: On Aug 28, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Piotr Bzdyl wrote: Hi, I would also like to participate in this session. When are you going to send data about the location of the IRC session? See http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?

Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-28 Thread Nodet Guillaume
I'm using Colloquy (http://colloquy.info/) Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On Aug 28, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Daryl Richter wrote: On Aug 28, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote: On Aug 28, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Piotr Bzdyl wrote: Hi, I would also like to participate in this session. When are you

Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-28 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Colloquy (http://colloquy.info/) Yeah, I've used it for the last few years. It's not as comprehensive in functionality as some of the hard-core IRC clients for Linux (e.g., BitchX, etc.) but it's pretty nice and perfect for MacOS.

IRC session

2007-08-28 Thread Nodet Guillaume
Unfortunately I will be traveling until Friday evening. What about moving it to Monday instead at the same hour ? 3 pm GMT, 11 am EST, 8 am PST Sorry about that... Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

Re: Too easy to kill the server using the web console

2007-08-28 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Or simulate some burning smell by maxing on the CPU and burning some hardware if possible :o) On 8/29/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One other thought...perhaps we could play an audio clip of a shotgun or other firearm action being moved to suggest the consequences of hitting

Re: IRC session

2007-08-28 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately I will be traveling until Friday evening. What about moving it to Monday instead at the same hour ? 3 pm GMT, 11 am EST, 8 am PST Sorry about that... +1 Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL

Re: IRC session

2007-08-28 Thread Kit Plummer
On 8/28/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately I will be traveling until Friday evening. What about moving it to Monday instead at the same hour ? 3 pm GMT, 11 am EST, 8 am PST Sorry about that... +1 Bruce --

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3445) Verify log levels can be changed for openejb related log categories

2007-08-28 Thread David Blevins
On Aug 27, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Karan Malhi wrote: How do the users of geronimo set log levels? Should be through the log4 files in the /var/log directory of the install. -David On 8/27/07, David Blevins (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Verify log levels can be changed for openejb

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3445) Verify log levels can be changed for openejb related log categories

2007-08-28 Thread Karan Malhi
I dont even think they can change log levels. We used the logic that - if conf is present - use logging.properties - if conf is present - logging.properties is absent- install logging.properties and use it - if conf is absent, assume embedded and use embedded.logging.properties which is available

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-189) Error opening geronimo-web.xml

2007-08-28 Thread Shane Blake (JIRA)
Error opening geronimo-web.xml -- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-189 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-189 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Bug Components: eclipse-plugin

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-189) Error opening geronimo-web.xml

2007-08-28 Thread Shane Blake (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shane Blake updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-189: - Environment: Eclipse SDK Version: 3.3.0 Build id: I20070525-1350