Matt, Feature-wise, I think it'd be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but I'd rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox.
-- Jason Warner On 8/27/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Erik, Jason and Viet. This is really good. Since we're making a SNAPSHOT > available is there some point where we should declare a 1.0 ? > > On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote: > > All, > > After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable from > within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved logging/information > output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of interest out in the general > open source community in moving applications from Jboss to Geronimo (such as > today's inquiry on theserverside.com), I feel as though it would be of > some benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our confluence wiki > (http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html) > linked somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either as > it's own link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools, GBuild, or > XBean are situated, or as an addition inside the Development Tools page, > much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there. > > I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing (beyond what > is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own section, or a subsection of > development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good to get it up > and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide with the > recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there remotely > interested in migrating, there are tools available to assist and perhaps > 'hold their hand' a bit. > > > Thoughts? Comments? Objections? > > Thanks > -- > Erik B. Craig > > >
