Geronimo Revision: 693714 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080910/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080910/unit-test
mail.pop3s.socketFactory.class is ignored
-
Key: GERONIMO-4294
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4294
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Hi guys,
I am java developer currenlty working in developing web application.
I made a web app and is hosted on geronimo (wasce 2.0.0.1). My web app is a
Struts-Spring-Hibernante application with ACEGI security supported. Recently
I got one question which stuck in my mind and want to get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-4294.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Rick McGuire
Committed revision 693807.
Thanks for pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12629784#action_12629784
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-363:
Hi Ashish, we cu
In-line below.
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
I looked at the new plugin groups stuff and have a couple
ideas/suggestions.
I'm going to create a framework plugin group. Is there some reason this
won't work?
Are you updating the current pluginprofiles to use the framework profile?
I'd lik
Geronimo Revision: 693829 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080910/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080910/unit-test
David Jencks wrote:
I looked at the new plugin groups stuff and have a couple
ideas/suggestions.
I'm going to create a framework plugin group. Is there some reason this
won't work?
I'd like to see the plugin groups distributed closer to where their
components are found, e.g. web-jetty in p
Congrats BJ!
--kevan
On Sep 8, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi Everyone, The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that BJ Reed
has recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo
committer. BJ has contributed a number of significant enhancements
and fixes to our Ecl
Upgrade to Derby 10.4.2.0
-
Key: GERONIMO-4295
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4295
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: dep
Start Derby NetworkServerControl with credentials to prevent unauthorized
shutdowns
---
Key: GERONIMO-4296
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4296
Projec
Congratulations BJ!
Jay
Tim McConnell wrote:
> Hi Everyone, The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that BJ Reed has
> recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo committer.
> BJ has contributed a number of significant enhancements and fixes to our
> Eclipse Plugin.
>
> BJ, kee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12629877#action_12629877
]
Jürgen Weber commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511:
---
OK, I recant, inst
On Sep 10, 2008, at 12:09 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 9, 2008, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I looked at the new plugin groups stuff and have a couple ideas/
suggestions.
I'm going to create a framework plugin group. Is there some reason
this won't work?
I'd like to see the plug
RC1 has been posted and a Vote started.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status
Discussion thread for Geronimo Server 2.1.3 RC1 release thread -
http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Geronimo-2.1.3-release-tt19186703s134.html
-Donald
I'd vote for going with 1a) over 1b) and 1c) is not an option in my
mind. If someone ever does 1b) then great, but lets not hold up the
samples over it.
BTW - Should we start a Genesis 1.5 vote, since Samples is currently
using and needs the 1.5-SNAPSHOT level?
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
On Sep 10, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I'd vote for going with 1a) over 1b) and 1c) is not an option in my
mind. If someone ever does 1b) then great, but lets not hold up the
samples over it.
Have you got the sample working using the directory plugin? I
certainly didn't try.
On Sep 10, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I looked at the new plugin groups stuff and have a couple ideas/
suggestions.
I'm going to create a framework plugin group. Is there some reason
this won't work?
I'd like to see the plugin groups distributed closer to where t
Donald Woods wrote:
I'd vote for going with 1a) over 1b) and 1c) is not an option in my
mind. If someone ever does 1b) then great, but lets not hold up the
samples over it.
BTW - Should we start a Genesis 1.5 vote, since Samples is currently
using and needs the 1.5-SNAPSHOT level?
Oh yes,
David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 10, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I'd vote for going with 1a) over 1b) and 1c) is not an option in my
mind. If someone ever does 1b) then great, but lets not hold up the
samples over it.
Have you got the sample working using the directory plugin? I certa
On Sep 10, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
In-line below.
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
I looked at the new plugin groups stuff and have a couple ideas/
suggestions.
I'm going to create a framework plugin group. Is there some reason
this won't work?
Are you updating the current pl
1.5-SNAPSHOT includes the settings to not generate timestamped snapshot
artifacts, as requested by infra.
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
Donald Woods wrote:
I'd vote for going with 1a) over 1b) and 1c) is not an option in my
mind. If someone ever does 1b) then great, but lets not hold up the
sam
To help reduce one of the headaches of releasing the server (which I've
experienced the last 2 days) I went ahead and created a plugins
directory just for Samples and added it to the plugin-repository-list
for 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4 and 2.2 servers.
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/samples-2
I'm publishing the Samples 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT artifacts out right now, so
give it about 30 mins. before you try to test installing any of the
Sample plugins into the 2.1.3 server
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Discussion thread for Geronimo Server 2.1.3 RC1 release thread -
http://www.nabble.c
Right ... but we're trying to release a non-snapshot version of the
samples. So, I don't see the harm in rolling it back to genesis 1.4 for
the release if the only value add was for snapshot processing.
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
1.5-SNAPSHOT includes the settings to not generate timestamped s
BTW - I already ran rat:check on the source and generated jars and
didn't find anything that needed fixing. Jarek fixed a few files before
I ran rat and there are a couple special format files that we released
with a license header in 2.1.2.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Discussion thread f
Samples published. Have fun!
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
I'm publishing the Samples 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT artifacts out right now, so
give it about 30 mins. before you try to test installing any of the
Sample plugins into the 2.1.3 server
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Discussion thread for
David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 10, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I looked at the new plugin groups stuff and have a couple
ideas/suggestions.
I'm going to create a framework plugin group. Is there some reason
this won't work?
I'd like to see the plugin groups distribute
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12629972#action_12629972
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511:
That news item has a bad
Geronimo Revision: 693931 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080910/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080910
[INFO] BUILD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1262#action_1262
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511:
Thanks Ted, I di
Hi Jason,
Some contents have been updated already. I will join and work on the rest.
Rhoda
2008/9/5 Jason Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Rhoda,
>
> Will you be moving the content into the new structure as well?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Rhoda Zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Agree. Once we're in release mode, rolling back to genesis 1.4 is fine.
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
Right ... but we're trying to release a non-snapshot version of the
samples. So, I don't see the harm in rolling it back to genesis 1.4 for
the release if the only value add was for snapshot pro
Good point. I forgot about the more complex scenarios, where we could
be aggregating plugins from several subdirs, which would mean moving
them under /plugins wouldn't make sense. You would have a plugin build
under Tomcat that would rely upon other plugins being built in peer
subdirs, which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630073#action_12630073
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-490:
Hi Ashish, all t
Geronimo Revision: 694087 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080910/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080910
[INFO] BUILD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630077#action_12630077
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511:
My two cents:
1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630087#action_12630087
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511:
---
Still say we have
39 matches
Mail list logo
