If we distribute them with specific plugins (which are just one of many that
are included in the group) then I'm not clear how you would choose which
plugin to associate it with. For example, if you wanted a group that
included tomcat, cxf, ejb, and clustering which plugin would get "ownership"
Geronimo Revision: 694571 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080911/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080911
[INFO] BUILD
Congrats BJ!
Lin
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone, The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that BJ Reed has
> recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo committer. BJ
> has contributed a number of significant enhancements an
Hi, There is at least one scenario using Axis2 and Geronimo that is causing
jarfiles to get locked on Windows such that a deployed WAR cannot be either
redeployed or uninstalled. Here is a brief description of the failing scenario:
1. A WAR file containing various Axis2 jarfiles in the /lib dir
See in-line below.
> It was my understanding that the plugin-groups aggregated plugins together
> and could be arbitrarily complex. I also thought that the plugin groups
> would themselves be cars (with dependencies on other cars) that could be
> released and installed independently (however I ju
I had run into this before, but after changing the packaging type to
jar, the plugin group didn't get started.
Lin
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:35 AM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I messed something up but in my new server constructed using my new
> framework plugin group the pl
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply - I am on vacation this week.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:56 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at the new plugin groups stuff and have a couple ideas/suggestions.
>
> I'm going to create a framework plugin group. Is there some reason this
> won't w
Posting to Yahoo, Google, And MSN Groups yields great results and fresh leads
and sales. But it can be tedious and time consuming. This is where my service
comes in. For a onetime fee, your ad/message will be sent out to over 300+
combined Google, Yahoo, and MSN groups for life. The method I'm u
Session invalidation problem - WADI Tomcat Clustering
-
Key: GERONIMO-4299
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4299
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour updated GERONIMO-4299:
Attachment: fixWADITomcatIntegration.patch
> Session invalidation problem - WADI Tomcat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630398#action_12630398
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511:
It turns out that WTP kn
Maybe I don't understand your proposal. If I do, you are arguing that
the one new feature of plugin groups- that they do not define a
classloader for the dependencies -- should be removed (or not
implemented -- I'm not sure if it actually works yet) -- and we should
use only plugins for al
I've been thinking about plugingroups and I'm wondering why we need to
make them very much different than regular plugins.
We've been primarily focused on plugingroups as a way of simplifying the
creation of a custom server assembly. That's a good use of
plugingroups. However, perhaps it i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630379#action_12630379
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515:
Joe Bohn reported that t
I discovered that two of the files are used for Eclipse update site
mirroring. So, we want to keep those there.
I removed the other two files from the people.apache.org machine. I
guess it takes a while for the web site to get updated?
I opened JIRA GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515 Restore Mirroring to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630368#action_12630368
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515:
This page http://incubat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in Rev 694478.
> Restore Mirroring to the GEP Ec
Restore Mirroring to the GEP Eclipse Update Site
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-515
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Bug
Affect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-513.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.3
Support for utility
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630359#action_12630359
]
Jürgen Weber commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-511:
---
> I don't think yo
Utility project testsuite
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-514
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-514
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Tim McConnell
Ass
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-356.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> geronimo-service.xml support in GEP is incomplete
Restore support for WTP Utility Projects
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-513
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-513
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Improvement
Compon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reopened GERONIMODEVTOOLS-356:
> geronimo-service.xml support in GEP is incomplete
> ---
Geronimo Revision: 694368 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080911/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080911/unit-test-reports
Finally got back to hacking on GShell... and have been working on
replacing the Plexus container with a Spring container. Today I
finally got it working correctly, using maven repository for
dependencies.
Still got some work left to do to clean up the layout muck and make
the help comman
The TCK tests are running. I'll let you know when they pass.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe pointed out one of the distribution links in the email was wrong
> (included Tomcat minimal instead of the JEE5 zip url) so here are the
> updated links -
Someone mentioned on another thread(s) awhile back that they would like
to see us reduce the server footprint and startup time for 2.2.
One way to do this (mainly for footprint) would be to start moving some
of the plugins that are not required for a JEE5 runtime out of the
server assemblies w
Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.2.0 or later
--
Key: GERONIMO-4298
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4298
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Include TranQL connector for Oracle RAC
---
Key: GERONIMO-4297
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4297
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issue
In-line
Joe Bohn wrote:
I think most of the work has been done to get samples to a state where
they can be released. I plan to make one final push to get a release
candidate ... hopefully within a week or less. The largest things
remaining are:
1) Archetype - We need to decide what to do a
Joe pointed out one of the distribution links in the email was wrong
(included Tomcat minimal instead of the JEE5 zip url) so here are the
updated links -
For your convenience, here are pointers to the JEE5 distributions:
http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/releases/geronimo-2.1.3-RC1/geronimo-jet
On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
As a "user" I hate how the Plugin portlet and cmdline show plugins
that can't/shouldn't be installed on my Tomcat JEE5 or Minimal
server
Seems that we're confusing/complicating everyone's life for a
framework assembly scenario that sh
On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:11 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I really think its essential that we upgrade to activemq 5.x. I'm
happy to work on this but have a bunch of stuff to finish first.
I'm likely to vote against any release proposal that doesn't include
this. If anyone else wants to take a
FYI we're currently in the process of releasing ApacheDS 1.5.4 which should
have serious improvements. Will be out the door in about 1-2 hours.
Alex
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agree. Once we're in release mode, rolling back to genesis 1.4 is fin
As a "user" I hate how the Plugin portlet and cmdline show plugins that
can't/shouldn't be installed on my Tomcat JEE5 or Minimal server
Seems that we're confusing/complicating everyone's life for a framework
assembly scenario that should be handled in the code:
- If a plugin lists tomcat o
Geronimo Revision: 694237 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080911/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080911
[INFO] BUILD
On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
OK, it's because of wanting to install on a framework assembly
Guess we're stuck with this for 2.1, but never liked this approach,
especially given we are providing Tomcat and Jetty versions of each
sample and most do truly prereq a web
OK, it's because of wanting to install on a framework assembly
Guess we're stuck with this for 2.1, but never liked this approach,
especially given we are providing Tomcat and Jetty versions of each
sample and most do truly prereq a web container...
I disagree with this approach for 2.2 si
I really think its essential that we upgrade to activemq 5.x. I'm
happy to work on this but have a bunch of stuff to finish first. I'm
likely to vote against any release proposal that doesn't include
this. If anyone else wants to take a look I'm happy to give advice.
The first piece of
I just added an item for Grails/JRuby that I'd like to investigate for 2.2.
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
Reviving thread
Does anyone have additional items they would like to see in a 2.2
release that is not listed on the 2.2 Roadmap page?
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/G
Reviving thread
Does anyone have additional items they would like to see in a 2.2
release that is not listed on the 2.2 Roadmap page?
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2+Release+Roadmap
-Donald
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
We kinda started to have some dis
The 2.1.3 Server is out for a vote.
Joe is wrapping up Samples.
Tim will be working on a GEP 2.1.3 release soon after the server release.
Moving the 2.2 discussions to a new thread.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Want to get everyone starting to think about the releases we want for
the rest of
We had this discussion a while ago (along with a lot of other samples
issues). The results were summarized in the wiki status page:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-samples-212-release-work-items.html
Here's the thread where it was discussed:
http://tiny.cc/uVkbL
Joe
Donald Wood
Thanks.
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Yep. The build got stuck on the 6th and since I screwed some things up
I wasn't seeing the email notifications saying so. Sorry. Should be
fixed now.
Jarek
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Haven't seen any 2.0 or 2.1 since Se
I think most of the work has been done to get samples to a state where
they can be released. I plan to make one final push to get a release
candidate ... hopefully within a week or less. The largest things
remaining are:
1) Archetype - We need to decide what to do about this. I'm a bit torn
You want to clean that up or need some help?
--jason
On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:01 PM, Ted Kirby wrote:
Thanks guys! We are using
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/updates/ as the production
GEP distribution site. I think we can remove this site, and stop
copying files to it.
Ted
On
Yep. The build got stuck on the 6th and since I screwed some things up
I wasn't seeing the email notifications saying so. Sorry. Should be
fixed now.
Jarek
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Haven't seen any 2.0 or 2.1 since Sept. 5th and was just wondering
Seems that only one of the samples has the tomcat/jetty prerequisite
set. Why? Shouldn't we include this setting so the Plugin portlet will
only allow the appropriate samples to be installed?
-Donald
Thanks guys! We are using
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/updates/ as the production
GEP distribution site. I think we can remove this site, and stop
copying files to it.
Ted
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats pretty much it, I've no ide
Thats pretty much it, I've no idea what is using that content, but its
in the site tree so it gets published via the cron scripts.
--jason
On Sep 11, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I don't know what is for, but I'm pretty sure it is coming from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/
Haven't seen any 2.0 or 2.1 since Sept. 5th and was just wondering
what's up?
-Donald
I don't know what is for, but I'm pretty sure it is coming from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/docs/devtools
I think Jason set up some cron jobs to copy content from our svn site
repository to the actual site ... hence the daily copies.
Joe
Ted Kirby wrote:
I recently
I recently discovered this URL, and wanted to learn what it was used
for. The site.xml file is old, and I don't know what the screenshot
file is for.
The files are updated daily. jdillion is the owner. Jason, can you
shed any light on these files? Or anyone else?
Thanks,
Ted
Its a good idea, just means we have to code something up to
reconfigure JUL, there is something here we can probably use:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/sandbox/jul-to-log4j-bridge
--jason
On Sep 10, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Is there a reason why we don't redirect
Geronimo Revision: 694152 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080911/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080911/unit-test
56 matches
Mail list logo
