[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 928615

Geronimo Revision: 928615 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100329/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100329/unit-test

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5208) console is broken after upgrading dojo to 1.4.2

console is broken after upgrading dojo to 1.4.2 --- Key: GERONIMO-5208 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5208 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-5208) console is broken after upgrading dojo to 1.4.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang resolved GERONIMO-5208. --- Resolution: Fixed Verified in 22 branch. But the fix should apply to trunk as well.

Re: problems with admin console in trunk

Opened a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5208 for this and fixed it in trunk @rev: 928630 On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that this might be caused by recent dojo upgrade, I'll take a look at this. On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5208) console is broken after upgrading dojo to 1.4.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rahul Mehta updated GERONIMO-5208: -- Attachment: printscreen.png I also encountered broken console problem on trunk yesterday,

Re: [VOTE] Release tomcat-parent-6.0.26

Just get the TCK result for Tomcat 6.0.26.0, all cases passed. +1 2010/3/25 Delos dait...@gmail.com TCK for tomcat-parent-6.0.26 is ongoing. Ivan, could you give the result here once TCK is completed? Thanks in advance! 2010/3/25 Delos dait...@gmail.com This voting is for

Re: [VOTE] Release tomcat-parent-6.0.26

Thanks! Here is my +1 2010/3/29 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com Just get the TCK result for Tomcat 6.0.26.0, all cases passed. +1 2010/3/25 Delos dait...@gmail.com TCK for tomcat-parent-6.0.26 is ongoing. Ivan, could you give the result here once TCK is completed? Thanks in advance!

Re: Delay Geronimo 2.1.5 RC to Mar. 30

Dear all, We almost closed all the JIRAs that MUST be fixed for 2.1.5, except the two opened for upgrade Tomcat and OpenEJB. Hope the votes can be passed tomorrow so that we can make a RC on time. I also create a wiki page to record what changes I have made for 2.1.5 build, please refer:

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607) Missing JSTL jar in server runtime

Missing JSTL jar in server runtime --- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5209) Geronimo support for tranql XA JDBC adapter for DB2 on ISeries

Geronimo support for tranql XA JDBC adapter for DB2 on ISeries -- Key: GERONIMO-5209 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5209 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5209) Geronimo support for tranql XA JDBC adapter for DB2 on ISeries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850863#action_12850863 ] Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-5209: --- Tranql JIRA link

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 928762

Geronimo Revision: 928762 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100329/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100329/unit-test

Re: [VOTE] Release tomcat-parent-6.0.26

+1 I checked source, signature/checksums, and build. All looked good. --kevan On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Delos wrote: This voting is for tomcat-parent-6.0.26. It will be used by Geronimo 2.1.5.It's based on tomcat 6.0.26, built with maven. Besides, we also applied some patches which

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5065) EJBs in WAR files enhancement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-5065: --- Component/s: web Tomcat OpenEJB Jetty

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5074) EJB 3.1 Lite enhancements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-5074: --- Component/s: OpenEJB EJB 3.1 Lite enhancements -

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5073) EJB 3.1 Enhancements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-5073: --- Component/s: OpenEJB EJB 3.1 Enhancements Key:

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5210) Openejb under osgi in geronimo

Openejb under osgi in geronimo -- Key: GERONIMO-5210 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5210 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components:

Connector/openejb progress/heads up

I have most of the new j2ca connector functionality working ok, and finding out whether the rest of it works requires mdbs. So I'm going to work on getting openejb running in trunk. Currently there's a bit of a fight between an osgi extender that registers openejb services set up

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5211) geronimo start command is very verbose

geronimo start command is very verbose -- Key: GERONIMO-5211 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5211 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues)

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5212) Do we need Karaf when starting Geronimo?

Do we need Karaf when starting Geronimo? Key: GERONIMO-5212 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5212 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues)

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5213) Review Geronimo 3.0 commands need a thorough review

Review Geronimo 3.0 commands need a thorough review --- Key: GERONIMO-5213 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5213 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level:

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 928870

Geronimo Revision: 928870 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100329/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100329/unit-test

3.0 Milestone Release?

I'm curious to hear the community's thoughts about starting to pull together a 3.0 Milestone release. I think there's been a lot of progress on trunk and that it would be valuable to start pulling things together for a release. If anything, just planning for a release starts to identify hat

Deploying Aries Blog sample AriesTrader on Geronimo

Hi all, I recently integrated the JTA and JPA pieces from Aries in Geronimo and exposed connection factories in OSGi service registry. With these changes we now have all the main pieces in place to deploy unmodified Aries Blog sample AriesTrader on Geronimo. Here's how to do it: 1) Make sure

Re: Connector/openejb progress/heads up

On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:37 AM, David Jencks wrote: I have most of the new j2ca connector functionality working ok, and finding out whether the rest of it works requires mdbs. So I'm going to work on getting openejb running in trunk. Currently there's a bit of a fight between an osgi

Re: Connector/openejb progress/heads up

On Mar 29, 2010, at 2:58 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:37 AM, David Jencks wrote: I have most of the new j2ca connector functionality working ok, and finding out whether the rest of it works requires mdbs. So I'm going to work on getting openejb running in trunk.

Publish with GEP takes minutes, while deploy takes 10 seconds

Hi, I have an Enterprise Application (EAR) that I develop in Eclipse (galileo-SR1). When I publish my EAR to the started local Geronimo V2.1.4 server, it takes more then 3 minutes to finish. I use GEP version 2.2. During the process 1 CPU is constantly running at 100%, so it looks like the

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5214) connector builder should export interfaces that need to be used by users of the connector

connector builder should export interfaces that need to be used by users of the connector - Key: GERONIMO-5214 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5214

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5214) connector builder should export interfaces that need to be used by users of the connector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851174#action_12851174 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5214: rev 928947, seems to work maybe we

Re: 3.0 Milestone Release?

A milestone release might be a good report for what we have done. I wish to include some servlet 3.0 updates that I am working now. 2010/3/30 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com I'm curious to hear the community's thoughts about starting to pull together a 3.0 Milestone release. I think

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 928953

Geronimo Revision: 928953 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100329/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100329/unit-test

Re: [VOTE] Release tomcat-parent-6.0.26

+1 On 3/24/2010 10:44 PM, Delos wrote: This voting is for tomcat-parent-6.0.26. It will be used by Geronimo 2.1.5.It http://2.1.5.It's based on tomcat 6.0.26, built with maven. Besides, we also applied some patches which haven't been included in tomcat 6.0.26. Based on tomcat 6.0.26 tag,

Re: Webapp Annotation processing for 299

Bringing this thread up again as it is still a major TODO and if someone is looking for something to work on, it's a very good place. On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:16 PM, David Blevins wrote: Great summary, thanks! So as I mentioned on the OpenEJB list and the reason I kicked the thread over here

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5093) Create JAXB 2.2 spec jar

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang closed GERONIMO-5093. - Resolution: Fixed there's only signature testing for jaxb, there won't be singature problems

Re: Webapp Annotation processing for 299

I'd like to work on this. Is there a JIRA opened for this ? On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:43 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote: Bringing this thread up again as it is still a major TODO and if someone is looking for something to work on, it's a very good place. On Aug 21, 2009, at

Re: [VOTE] Release tomcat-parent-6.0.26

Thanks all! Here is the voting result +1: Ivan, Kevan, Rick So it has passed voting! 2010/3/30 Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com +1 On 3/24/2010 10:44 PM, Delos wrote: This voting is for tomcat-parent-6.0.26. It will be used by Geronimo 2.1.5.It's based on tomcat 6.0.26, built with

Re: Publish with GEP takes minutes, while deploy takes 10 seconds

Hi Boes, I also found with eclipse 3.5+, the deployment seems slower than before. I'm still investigating the root cause. In deployment process, GEP will pass all artifacts(EAR,WAR,JAR) to WTP. As I know, WTP will analyze these artifacts, generate many objects, packageextract them. I've ever

Re: Connector/openejb progress/heads up

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:37 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: I have most of the new j2ca connector functionality working ok, and finding out whether the rest of it works requires mdbs.  So I'm going to work on getting openejb running in trunk. Currently there's a bit of a

Re: Webapp Annotation processing for 299

On Mar 29, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: I'd like to work on this. Is there a JIRA opened for this ? Not yet. Feel free to create as many subtasks as you need under this jira: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5080 Maybe a good title for this one would be something

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607) Missing JSTL jar in server runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Delos Dai closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607. -- Missing JSTL jar in server runtime ---

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607) Missing JSTL jar in server runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Delos Dai resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-607. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 2.2.1

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5208) console is broken after upgrading dojo to 1.4.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang closed GERONIMO-5208. - Closing it. console is broken after upgrading dojo to 1.4.2