[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 930806

2010-04-05 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 930806 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100405/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100405/unit-test

SNAPSHOT versions in current trunk

2010-04-05 Thread Rick McGuire
Tomcat: 7.0.0.0-SNAPSHOT. This is a version build in the geronimo external, so we release this largely concurrent with the server release. openejb: 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT: I believe we've had some patches and modifications above and beyond the most recent openejb release. xbean: 3.7-SNAPSHOT:

Re: SNAPSHOT versions in current trunk

2010-04-05 Thread Rick McGuire
Sorry about this...hit the wrong key sequence in Thunderbird and sent this out in draft status. Still working on pulling together the list of snapshots in Geronimo 3.0...the complete list and discussion will be coming later. Rick On 4/5/2010 6:56 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: Tomcat:

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 930842

2010-04-05 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 930842 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100405/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100405/unit-test-reports

SNAPSHOT dependencies in Geronimo 3.0

2010-04-05 Thread Rick McGuire
Ok, the completed email that I accidentally sent out earlier. Since we're targetting an M1 release of Geroinimo 3.0, we need to be taking a close look at the snapshot dependencies we have in the release. Here is what I believe is the complete list of current snapshot dependencies. We have

components dependencies

2010-04-05 Thread Rick McGuire
This is sort of related to the earlier email I sent out about the snapshot dependencies. In looking at the dependencies of the subprojects in the geronimo components tree, I find what appear to be a few problems we should probably correct: geronimo-schema-javaee_6: This is ok as it stands,

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 930855

2010-04-05 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 930855 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100405/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100405/unit-test

Re: components dependencies

2010-04-05 Thread Ivan
For geronimo-schema-java1.4 and java 5 schemas, I wish somebody could double-check the descriptions in the license and notice files in the geronimo-schema-javaee_6 before moving them out. I have mentioned it in the past, and Donald gave me some suggestions to refer to the OpenJPA project. I do

Re: components dependencies

2010-04-05 Thread Kevan Miller
On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Ivan wrote: For geronimo-schema-java1.4 and java 5 schemas, I wish somebody could double-check the descriptions in the license and notice files in the geronimo-schema-javaee_6 before moving them out. I have mentioned it in the past, and Donald gave me some

Re: components dependencies

2010-04-05 Thread Ivan
Thanks, Kevan. I am afraid that we may still need to release an OSGI style 1.4 and 1.5 for Geronimo 3.0. 2010/4/5 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Ivan wrote: For geronimo-schema-java1.4 and java 5 schemas, I wish somebody could double-check the descriptions

Re: components dependencies

2010-04-05 Thread Rick McGuire
On 4/5/2010 10:02 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Ivan wrote: For geronimo-schema-java1.4 and java 5 schemas, I wish somebody could double-check the descriptions in the license and notice files in the geronimo-schema-javaee_6 before moving them out. I have mentioned

Re: 3.0 Milestone Release?

2010-04-05 Thread Jarek Gawor
A few thoughts: 1) Yes, I think it would be good to have a milestone release to show some of the Aries + Java EE 6 stuff. 2) I am concerned about the number of snapshot dependencies and the time would take to release them all for the milestone. So we should start releasing stuff now... but at

Re: SNAPSHOT dependencies in Geronimo 3.0

2010-04-05 Thread Jarek Gawor
Rick, There are a few more snapshot dependencies in trunk: org.apache.ws.scout, org.apache.juddi, org.apache.activemq, org.apache.portals.pluto and also a few more Aries modules: org.apache.aries.web.*, org.apache.aries.application.*, org.apache.aries.jpa.* Jarek On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:43

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 930915

2010-04-05 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 930915 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100405/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100405/unit-test-reports

Re: SNAPSHOT dependencies in Geronimo 3.0

2010-04-05 Thread David Jencks
The geronimo-cpp_1.0_spec has never been near a tck. It's needed for pluto 2. I thought I'd requested the tck on jcp-open but don't seem to have. I guess we should? thanks david jencks On Apr 5, 2010, at 5:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: Ok, the completed email that I accidentally sent out

Re: components dependencies

2010-04-05 Thread David Jencks
On Apr 5, 2010, at 6:06 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: This is sort of related to the earlier email I sent out about the snapshot dependencies. In looking at the dependencies of the subprojects in the geronimo components tree, I find what appear to be a few problems we should probably correct:

Re: SNAPSHOT dependencies in Geronimo 3.0

2010-04-05 Thread David Jencks
On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Rick, There are a few more snapshot dependencies in trunk: org.apache.ws.scout, org.apache.juddi, I think I got these projects to osgi-enable their latest releases so they may be usable. I also don't think we need to build the geronimo

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 930983

2010-04-05 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 930983 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100405/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100405/unit-test-reports

OSGi requirements

2010-04-05 Thread Tim McConnell
Will Geronimo 3.0 support all the specifications in the OSGi Service Platform Enterprise Specification ?? Or only a subset ?? -- Thanks, Tim McConnell

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 930992

2010-04-05 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 930992 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100405/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100405/unit-test

Pluto jar problem in Geronimo 2.1

2010-04-05 Thread Amit Puri
Hi All In Geronimo 2.1.4, when I use Geronimo Database pool wizard in ServicesDatabase Pools and provide Database Type as SQL Server, I found Driver Connection Properties like this: Driver Connection Properties- Typical JDBC URL: jdbc:sqlserver://{Host}:{Port} When I checked

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5036) [OpenEJB] Unable to clear Sun JarFileFactory cache: warning after upgrading to Sun JDK 1.6.0 u18

2010-04-05 Thread Rex Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-5036. -- Resolution: Fixed Closing it because geronimo 2.1.5 has upgraded openejb to 3.0.2 [OpenEJB]

Re: Pluto jar problem in Geronimo 2.1

2010-04-05 Thread chi runhua
Rex, you might want to take a look at this one. It would be much better if the patch is included in G2.1.5 because it's feature-related. Jeff On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Amit Puri puri.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All In Geronimo 2.1.4, when I use Geronimo Database pool wizard in

Re: Pluto jar problem in Geronimo 2.1

2010-04-05 Thread Rex Wang
The patch in PLUTO-579 seems not be applied in pluto. I have checked this with Ivan, and Ivan has pulled the workaround in Geronimo-4836 into G 2.1.5. please verify. -Rex 2010/4/6 chi runhua chirun...@gmail.com Rex, you might want to take a look at this one. It would be much better if the

About G3.0 Java EE 6 Samples

2010-04-05 Thread Forrest Xia
Hi All, We prepared some samples regarding Jave EE 6 new features, so far including these: 1. WebFragment Description: This sample demonstrate define new features of servlet 3.0 like web-fragment.xml and use jars with web-fragment.xml _

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5159) Add pause when startup.bat fails on Windows

2010-04-05 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Forrest Xia updated GERONIMO-5159: -- Attachment: (was: GERONIMO-5159-refined.patch) Add pause when startup.bat fails on

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5159) Add pause when startup.bat fails on Windows

2010-04-05 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Forrest Xia updated GERONIMO-5159: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-5159-refined2.patch Missing %% for windows environment viable tag, so

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5037) Support Servlet 3.0 annotation and fragment web file

2010-04-05 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853752#action_12853752 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5037: Commit first step changes to trunk at revision: 931020,

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 931024

2010-04-05 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 931024 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100406/build-0200.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100406/unit-test-reports