Geronimo Revision: 937757 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100425/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100425/unit-test
Geronimo Revision: 937793 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100425/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100425/unit-test
Um, here's my +1
david jencks
On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB
and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading
related code changes from previous yoko releases.
Staging
+1
I checked that all the source-release tar.gz's compile and that geronimo runs
with them.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications.
I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have downloaded do
not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For instance:
$ md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat
yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5
md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat
Geronimo Revision: 937856 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100425/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100425/unit-test
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Here are 3 scripts attached to help checkout, rat:check and build the
tags in the vote.
Thanks for the scripts. A few comments:
1) We are voting on source artifacts, not svn. So, I use wget. (e.g. 'wget
--no-check-certificate
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Can we ignore the following rat:check failures?
geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -
src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/xml.xsd
src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 -
Looks good. Thanks Rick! Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single
vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6.
Delos,
For scanning mailing list history, it's helpful if you update the Subject with
a [RESULT]
--kevan
On Apr 23, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Delos wrote:
Besides, we also get +1 from Ashish and Forrest, thanks!
2010/4/23 Delos dait...@gmail.com
GEP RC1 passed the voting with following result
0:
The bad checksums seem to be because somehow maven 2.2.0 got installed on my
system. I have no idea why, but it's known to produce bad checksums.
I'll try to contact e.g. brian fox to see what we can do about them. I think
usually what has happened in the past is to promote, then fix, but
Geronimo Revision: 937907 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100425/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100425/unit-test
Sounds good to me.
Jarek
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:20 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Jarek has written a bunch of useful looking osgi utility type stuff currently
in geronimo-kernel. At least one of the classes, BundleAnnotationFinder,
could be quite useful to other
Refactor GEP 3.0 code to decouple various server adapters
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-643
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-643
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue
14 matches
Mail list logo
