but we have not looked back after the M2 conversion. Our poms
have changed much since then because of transitive deps so it would take
a significant effort to produce the M1 poms again.
Really wish we had a tool for this.
Regards,
Alex
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
> BTW, Alex, are there plans to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2014?page=all ]
Alexei Zakharov updated GERONIMO-2014:
--
Attachment: geronimo-1.2_to_apacheds-1.0-RC2_modules_directory_pom_xml.patch
Both patches should be applied.
> Geronimo uses outdated vers
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2014?page=all ]
Alexei Zakharov updated GERONIMO-2014:
--
Attachment: geronimo-1.2_to_apacheds-1.0-RC2.patch
> Geronimo uses outdated version of Apach
Versions: 1.2
Environment: P4 3.0Ghz 2Gb WinXP
Reporter: Alexei Zakharov
Outdated version of Apache Directory Server is currently used by Geronimo. This
is a cause of GERONIMO-1805 bug and probably some other issues. Attached
patches port Geronimo directory module to ApachedDS 1.0 RC2. It
BTW, Alex, are there plans to propagate ADS jars to maven1 repo?
Geronimo 1.1 currently supports maven1 only.
Thanks,
2006/5/6, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alex,
Oh, I've been searching in old "directory" and "directory-network"
groups rather th
integration and do the
build and packaging under Maven 2 (I'm assuming that Geronimo HEAD has
a Maven 2 packaging plugin, but if not, I guess we can work on one).
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/10/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ApacheDS0.9.2 to 1.0-RC2 ?
> I have
1.2.1 to 1.3-SNAPSHOT
>> tranql-connector from 1.1 to 1.2-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> This is the list so far...I've updated
>>
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+Package+Tracking
>>
>> with this information.
>>
>> Was mentioned on the list:
>> Howl- Researching this
--
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
Alex,
Oh, I've been searching in old "directory" and "directory-network"
groups rather than "org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core". Thank
you for pointing the right group id.
2006/5/5, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
>
there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to
>>> G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you
>>> have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to
>>> RC1 or RC2 when it comes out.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alex
--
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
eek coming week or week there after. But looking at
> emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to
> G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you
> have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to
> RC1 or RC2 when it
with signs of dissatisfaction with the outdated version of
Apache DS currently being used. So it seems that we need to move
Geronimo to ApacheDS 1.0 anyway. I can start working on the
corresponding patch. Any comments & objections?
2006/4/14, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Jacek,
se/DIRSERVER-607
2006/4/11, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 4/11/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However, they use different API since ApacheDS 1.0
> > RC1, some packages are renamed. Some efforts will be required to
> > rewrite the
nt API since ApacheDS 1.0
RC1, some packages are renamed. Some efforts will be required to
rewrite the Geronimo portion of the code.
2006/4/5, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Kevan,
>
> > FYI: Apache DS is here -- http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/
>
> Thanks!
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1805?page=comments#action_12374056
]
Alexei Zakharov commented on GERONIMO-1805:
---
I have tried thier recent stable build ApacheDS 1.0 RC1 (as well as previous
stable builds). The bug is still
Kevan,
> FYI: Apache DS is here -- http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/
Thanks! I will try their recent builds.
2006/4/5, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Apr 5, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Alexei Zakharov wrote:
>
> > Hi Kevan,
> >
> > This is follow-u
em. Do anybody knows from where apacheds
comes from? Is it a separate Apache project?
This is follow-up to the story about BEA VMs. I have analized
2006/3/21, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Alexei Zakharov wrote:
>
> Hi Kevan,
>
> I w
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1805?page=all ]
Alexei Zakharov updated GERONIMO-1805:
--
Attachment: MyDirectoryTest.java
Below is the running statistics for this test on various JVMs.
Running on Sun 1.4.2 and Sun 1.5.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1805?page=all ]
Alexei Zakharov updated GERONIMO-1805:
--
Description:
The unit test from "directory" module -
org.apache.geronimo.directory.RunningTest - hangs while running on BEA JRock
issues)
Components: naming
Versions: 1.0
Environment: 3Ghz Pentium 4 CPU, 2 GB RAM, Win XP professional SP 2
Reporter: Alexei Zakharov
The unit test from "directory" module -
org.apache.geronimo.directory.RunningTest - hangs while running on BEA JRockit
VMs. I have
(org.apache.geronimo.gbean.*). Neither "maven javadoc:generate" from
the /modules/kernel nor "maven javadoc" from the root src folder
works. Javadoc is generated for org.apache.geronimo.kernel.* only. And
I didn't find any mention of specific package names in nearby xmls.
Did I do something w
ibe to work. There's a reasonable chance that these are Geronimo bugs that are masked by our current runtime. So, it would be great if you could help us uncover the causes of these failures.
I don't know why JRockit 1.5 would be worse.
--kevan
On Mar 17, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Alexei Zak
expected:<> but was:
These tests pass on all Sun VMs. Situation with Jrockit 1.5 is much worse - more than 60 failures. It may result in overall instability while running Geronimo on BEA.Any comments & suggestions?
Alexei Zakharov,Intel Middleware Product Division
22 matches
Mail list logo
