Non-binding, +1
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:31 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> +1
>
> -David
>
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> > Good evening!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
> >
> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes t
+1
-David
On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
>
> The staging repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content
s now.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Mark Struberg
> *To:* geronimo-dev
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 November 2013, 16:53
> *Subject:* [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
>
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to
>
> From: Mark Struberg
>To: geronimo-dev
>Sent: Monday, 25 November 2013, 16:53
>Subject: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
>
>
>
>Good evening!
>
>
>I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
>
>
>The API is already
+1
Thanks guys
2013/11/26 Romain Manni-Bucau
> Signature are available here
>
> https://java.net/projects/jbatch/sources/jsr-352-git-repository/show/JSR352.Tests.TCK?rev=6126835af9eb5dedb24825826820d1b7476e78e9
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.co
Signature are available here
https://java.net/projects/jbatch/sources/jsr-352-git-repository/show/JSR352.Tests.TCK?rev=6126835af9eb5dedb24825826820d1b7476e78e9
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: ht
+1 looks good
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
>
> The staging repo is
> https://repository
There's no TCK for this spec? I imagine if it passes the TCK then we're good.
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see
> nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent to build against j6
> so maybe no need to discuss it a lot in this thread ;).
I agree.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> for new spec I don't see how j7 could help to solve anything, for old
> it is possible. But well this is not blocking at all IMO so maybe no
> need to discuss it a lo
for new spec I don't see how j7 could help to solve anything, for old
it is possible. But well this is not blocking at all IMO so maybe no
need to discuss it a lot in this thread ;).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in
Hi Romain,
>From a runtime perspective, which in turn would require the build...
>From an EE Container perspective (EE.2.4.1):
"This specification requires that containers provide a Java Compatible™
runtime environment, as defined by the Java Platform, Standard Edition, v7
specification (Java SE).
Hi Kevin,
java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see
nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent to build against j6 almost the
whole stack.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github:
Hi Romain,
That's interesting when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires Java
SE 7... But, maybe since Java Batch can also be used in an SE environment,
they can change their requirement for SE. But, technically, they can't
override the requirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment.
It
nimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
>> >
>> > Hi Mark,
>> >
>> > "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 wh
Mark Struberg
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec
> says
> >
> > "This
Hi!
But target is 1.6, so it should run fine on jdk-1.6, right?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_
Hi Mark,
"the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says
"This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
requires Java 6 or higher. "
Not sure it is a blocker or not.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
L
Good evening!
I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
The staging repo is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
The source release is here
https://repo
18 matches
Mail list logo
