IMHO - If they are truly subprojects of Geronimo (and use the same svn
geronimo-committer group), then they should use org.apache.geronimo.*
for their released artifacts. Guess the complication now, is that they
already have released artifacts using other groupIds, which would
confuse users mo
On Dec 18, 2008, at 1:12 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Seems that as a "community" we should keep our project name as part
of all groupIds we generate...
If no one else feels that way, then fine, I will not call for a
vote, but my opinion stands... :-)
Just curious what you think about xbean and
Seems that as a "community" we should keep our project name as part of
all groupIds we generate...
If no one else feels that way, then fine, I will not call for a vote,
but my opinion stands... :-)
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 7:27 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Dec 16,
On Dec 17, 2008, at 7:27 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Seems like something we should vote on, given our specs, samples,
components and plugin subprojects all use org.apache.geronimo.*
IMO specs, samples, components and plugins are all specific t
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Seems like something we should vote on, given our specs, samples,
components and plugin subprojects all use org.apache.geronimo.*
IMO specs, samples, components and plugins are all specific to
geronimo, so the sub-package makes sense. xbean
Sure. I just but that issue in there so I don't forget :-)
--jason
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Seems like something we should vote on, given our specs, samples,
components and plugin subprojects all use org.apache.geronimo.*
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
No, it just
Seems like something we should vote on, given our specs, samples,
components and plugin subprojects all use org.apache.geronimo.*
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
No, it just seems that subprojects don't seem to use the parents
namespace. mina, activemq seems to follow that, even xbean does that
No, it just seems that subprojects don't seem to use the parents
namespace. mina, activemq seems to follow that, even xbean does
that. so i figured I would drop the extra layer.
--jason
On Dec 16, 2008, at 12:39 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Are you proposing GShell becoming a TLP and not a G
Are you proposing GShell becoming a TLP and not a Geronimo subproject?
-Donald
Jason Dillon (JIRA) wrote:
Repackage org.apache.geronimo.gshell.* -> org.apache.gshell.*
-
Key: GSHELL-151
URL: https:/
Repackage org.apache.geronimo.gshell.* -> org.apache.gshell.*
-
Key: GSHELL-151
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-151
Project: GShell
Issue Type: Improvement
S
10 matches
Mail list logo
