On Nov 26, 2007 2:36 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
commons-dbcp 1.3-SNAPSHOT
This looks like an openejb server dependency (i.e. not a container
dependency). Why would we need it?
Here's the change that introduced that dependency in OpenEJB:
On Nov 29, 2007 7:26 PM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we can get away with switching to 1.2.2 version as it seems to
have the same BasicDataSource API.
+1. I'm building openejb with 1.2.2 so I'll post the results in a
moment. If it passes openejb's tests I downgrade it to it.
On Nov 29, 2007 10:18 PM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 7:26 PM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we can get away with switching to 1.2.2 version as it seems to
have the same BasicDataSource API.
+1. I'm building openejb with 1.2.2 so I'll post the
Paul McMahan wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 2:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Pluto 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Has anybody pinged their list?
Joe and I have pinged their list, no response yet.
Ok, we did receive a response. At the
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I was just looking in the root pom. It seems there are a number of
snapshot dependencies that we would need to eliminate prior to a 2.1
release (or make private builds). I'll start working my way through
those that have released. We'll need
I was just looking in the root pom. It seems there are a number of
snapshot dependencies that we would need to eliminate prior to a 2.1
release (or make private builds). I'll start working my way through
those that have released. We'll need to start pushing for some releases
of those that
I'd like to find some time to test the geronimo trunk with the latest set of
specs that i've modified to make them OSGi friendly, but I doubt I will have
much time this week. It would be a good test to make sure there is no
regression caused by the change in the packaging mechanism...
On Nov 26,
The javamail version can be made into a release. It has a dependency on
the latest spec version, so we'd need to release that one too.
For yoko, I suspect we'll just need to do what we did for 2.0 and have a
known version in the Geronimo repository.
Rick
Joe Bohn wrote:
I was just looking
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I was just looking in the root pom. It seems there are a number of
snapshot dependencies that we would need to eliminate prior to a 2.1
release (or make private builds). I'll start working my way through
those that have released. We'll need
On Nov 26, 2007, at 2:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Pluto 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Has anybody pinged their list?
Joe and I have pinged their list, no response yet.
myfaces1.2.1-SNAPSHOT
Has anybody pinged
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I was just looking in the root pom. It seems there are a number of
snapshot dependencies that we would need to eliminate prior to a 2.1
release (or make private builds). I'll start working my way through
those that have
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I was just looking in the root pom. It seems there are a number of
snapshot dependencies that we would need to eliminate prior to a 2.1
release (or make private builds). I'll start working my way through
those that have
Joe Bohn wrote:
Are there other components that we should upgrade as well?
I recall hearing some discussion about moving to Dojo 1.0. Has anybody
looked into this further? Is this something we should do for Geronimo 2.1?
Joe
13 matches
Mail list logo
