Re: batchee-cdi 1.0.4 for Jakarta?

Hi Frank you can give a try to v2.0.0 - no classifier, excluding all transitive deps Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-347] Upgrade ASM from 9.7 to 9.7.1 [geronimo-xbean]

panbingkun commented on PR #41: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/41#issuecomment-2412572216 > @panbingkun release done and available on Central. @fpapon Good job, thank you very much! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messag

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-347] Upgrade ASM from 9.7 to 9.7.1 [geronimo-xbean]

fpapon commented on PR #41: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/41#issuecomment-2410562822 @panbingkun release done and available on Central. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.26

+1 (binding) Regards JB Le ven. 11 oct. 2024 à 02:13, Francois Papon a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache XBean 4.26 release to your vote. > > This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on the > release note): > > * Improvement > - [XBEAN-347] - Upgrade to A

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.26

+1 (binding) txs and LieGrue,strub On Friday, 11 October 2024 at 10:14:07 CEST, Francois Papon wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache XBean 4.26 release to your vote. This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on the release note): * Improvement - [XBEAN-

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.26

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [DISCUSS] XBean release

+1 LieGrue,strub On Wednesday, 9 October 2024 at 15:17:58 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: +1 Le mer. 9 oct. 2024 à 15:05, Francois Papon a écrit : Hi all, I would like to start the release process for the next XBean releasing including the new ASM version. Any objections? re

Re: [DISCUSS] XBean release

+1 Le mer. 9 oct. 2024 à 15:05, Francois Papon a écrit : > Hi all, > > I would like to start the release process for the next XBean releasing > including the new ASM version. > > Any objections? > > regards, > > -- > Françoisfpapon@apache.orgfrancois.pa...@openobject.fr > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

Hey all, anyone available to close this [VOTE]? It has been pending for _3 months_ now. As far as I can tell this release has the following votes: - Romain: -0 (binding) - Francois Papon: +1 (binding) - Richard Zowalla: +1 (non binding) - Jean-Baptiste Onofré: +1 (binding) - Jonathan Gallimore: +1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

I think we have sufficient votes now. Can we proceed with this release? It is pending for > 1 month now. On 2024/08/10 11:40:57 Richard Zowalla wrote: > @JL Has enough votes now? Can we proceed here? Thx > > On 2024/07/22 16:21:21 Mark Struberg via dev wrote: > > +1 > > > > LueGrue, > > strub >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

@JL Has enough votes now? Can we proceed here? Thx On 2024/07/22 16:21:21 Mark Struberg via dev wrote: > +1 > > LueGrue, > strub > > > Am 10.06.2024 um 16:03 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

+1 LueGrue, strub > Am 10.06.2024 um 16:03 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Hi everyone, > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1 > > SVN Tag > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

Hello +1 On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, 02:29 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Sorry for the delay ... > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 9:33 PM Richard Zowalla wrote: > > > > Ping ping :) > > > > On 2024/06/25 08:32:42 Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Jon > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

+1 (binding) Sorry for the delay ... Regards JB On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 9:33 PM Richard Zowalla wrote: > > Ping ping :) > > On 2024/06/25 08:32:42 Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > > +1 > > > > Jon > > > > On 2024/06/10 14:03:50 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I fixed 2 bugs

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

Ping ping :) On 2024/06/25 08:32:42 Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > +1 > > Jon > > On 2024/06/10 14:03:50 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more > > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

+1 Jon On 2024/06/10 14:03:50 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec > 2.1 > > *SVN Tag* > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/ta

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 4:03 PM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1 > > SVN Tag > https://svn.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

+1 (non binding) > Am 11.06.2024 um 08:40 schrieb Francois Papon : > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks! > > regards, > > François > > On 10/06/2024 16:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more >> than overdue. Here

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

+1 (binding) Thanks! regards, François On 10/06/2024 16:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Hi everyone, I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1 *_SVN Tag_* https://svn.apache.org/v

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

Hi, AFAIK GERONIMO-6870 prevents duplicated headers until it is in the hardcoded whitelist so -0 since it does not seem to match the mail usage these days (gmail for ex) - please correct me if I missed something (like a toggle or alike). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: Mail bugs

Hi JL, Just checking your own message in gmail there are more headers which are duplicated (Authentication-Results for ex) so I guess the logic is more to enable duplicated headers until it is known not allowed + probably a system property to customize the list when needed as a fallback. Side not

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 - Binaries

+1 Le ven. 3 mai 2024, 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:22 PM fpapon wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > A problem occured with the stagging repository of the release (the repo > > has been dropped), so had to redeploy them to a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 - Binaries

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:22 PM fpapon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > A problem occured with the stagging repository of the release (the repo > has been dropped), so had to redeploy them to a new stagging repo. > > I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 release binaries to yo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 - Binaries

+1 (binding) On 01/05/2024 17:22, fpapon wrote: Hi everyone, A problem occured with the stagging repository of the release (the repo has been dropped), so had to redeploy them to a new stagging repo. I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 release binaries to your vote. Staging Maven reposit

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 - Binaries

+1 Am 1. Mai 2024 17:22:04 MESZ schrieb fpapon : >Hi everyone, > >A problem occured with the stagging repository of the release (the repo has >been dropped), so had to redeploy them to a new stagging repo. > >I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 release binaries to your vote. > >Staging Maven r

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 - Binaries

+1 thanks for rerolling it since most users will consume it Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

rmannibucau merged PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geroni

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:56 PM fpapon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 release to your vote. > > Release Notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314924&version=12352769 > > Staging Maven repository: >

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

rmannibucau commented on PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#issuecomment-2079488495 @ArneLimburg my idea was 1. let it open the week end to let a chance to others to review, 2. get it merged next week - can do it, 3. target a release the week after if somebody is

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#issuecomment-2079351431 @rmannibucau Thank you for reviewing. What is the process to get this merged and get a release out? Note: I have no write access to this repository -- This is an automated me

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#issuecomment-2078962408 @rmannibucau Would you please take a look at the changes? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0

+1 (binding) François On 22/04/2024 21:56, fpapon wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 release to your vote. Release Notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314924&version=12352769 Staging Maven repository: https://repository.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0

Hi, thanks for preparing. +1 (non binding) Gruß Richard Am Montag, dem 22.04.2024 um 21:56 +0200 schrieb fpapon: > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 release to your vote. > > Release Notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314924&versi

Re: [PR] [BATCHEE-199] Upgrade to XBean 4.25 [geronimo-batchee]

fpapon merged PR #30: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/30 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.a

Re: [batch] 2.0.0 release?

+1, thank you Le dim. 21 avr. 2024 à 10:10, Richard Zowalla a écrit : > Guess, you can go for it :-) > I am done with my changes. > > Gruß > Richard > > > Am 21. April 2024 10:01:44 MESZ schrieb Francois Papon < > francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: > >> +1 >> >> I can try to run the release process

Re: [batch] 2.0.0 release?

Guess, you can go for it :-) I am done with my changes. Gruß Richard Am 21. April 2024 10:01:44 MESZ schrieb Francois Papon : >+1 > >I can try to run the release process if needed, just ask me :) > >regards, > >François > >On 19/04/2024 21:02, Richard Zowalla wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> since the

Re: [batch] 2.0.0 release?

+1 I can try to run the release process if needed, just ask me :) regards, François On 19/04/2024 21:02, Richard Zowalla wrote: Hi all, since the TCK challenge is resolved and we are passing the full Batch TCK and updated most of the dependencies of BatchEE, what do you think about doing a 2

Re: [batch] 2.0.0 release?

Sounds good Le ven. 19 avr. 2024 à 23:02, Richard Zowalla a écrit : > Hi all, > > since the TCK challenge is resolved and we are passing the full Batch > TCK and updated most of the dependencies of BatchEE, what do you think > about doing a 2.0.0 release? > > Gruß > Richard >

Re: [PR] BATCHEE-191 - Test with TomEE 10 (EE10) + TomEE 9.1 (EE9.1) [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 merged PR #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/26 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apa

Re: [PR] BATCH-192 - Upgrade to Camel 3 [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 merged PR #28: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/28 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apa

Re: [PR] BATCHEE-190 - Add TCK Signature Checks [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 merged PR #27: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/27 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apa

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.25 release

+1 (binding) On 15/04/2024 13:34, fpapon wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache XBean 4.25 release to your vote. This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on the release note): * Bug     - [XBEAN-343] - consistent handling of NoClassDefFoundError * Improvement     - [XB

Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven:maven-core from 3.0.5 to 3.8.1 in /tools/maven-plugin [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 closed pull request #20: Bump org.apache.maven:maven-core from 3.0.5 to 3.8.1 in /tools/maven-plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/20 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL abo

Re: [PR] Bump hazelcast from 3.12.13 to 5.3.0 in /extensions/hazelcast [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 closed pull request #19: Bump hazelcast from 3.12.13 to 5.3.0 in /extensions/hazelcast URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/19 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to th

Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven:maven-core from 3.0.5 to 3.8.1 in /tools/maven-plugin [geronimo-batchee]

r or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] Bump hazelcast from 3.12.13 to 5.3.0 in /extensions/hazelcast [geronimo-batchee]

r or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] Bump htmlunit from 2.12 to 2.37.0 in /gui [geronimo-batchee]

r or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] Bump htmlunit from 2.12 to 2.37.0 in /gui [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 closed pull request #17: Bump htmlunit from 2.12 to 2.37.0 in /gui URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/17 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.derby:derby from 10.15.2.0 to 10.17.1.0 [geronimo-batchee]

r or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.derby:derby from 10.15.2.0 to 10.17.1.0 [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 closed pull request #29: Bump org.apache.derby:derby from 10.15.2.0 to 10.17.1.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/29 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spec

Re: [PR] Bump camel-core from 2.25.4 to 3.2.0 in /extensions/camel [geronimo-batchee]

r or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] Bump camel-core from 2.25.4 to 3.2.0 in /extensions/camel [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 closed pull request #18: Bump camel-core from 2.25.4 to 3.2.0 in /extensions/camel URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/18 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the sp

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 closed pull request #23: Try latest TomEE version for release build URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.25 release

+1 (non-binding) Am Montag, dem 15.04.2024 um 17:43 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg via dev: > +1 > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 15.04.2024 um 13:34 schrieb fpapon : > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache XBean 4.25 release to your vote. > > > > This release mainly includes (other

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.25 release

+1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 15.04.2024 um 13:34 schrieb fpapon : > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache XBean 4.25 release to your vote. > > This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on > the release note): > > * Bug > - [XBEAN-343] - consistent handling of NoCl

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.25 release

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

rmannibucau commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562739816 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562630640 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562571073 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

rmannibucau commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562554479 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

rmannibucau commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562551986 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562544797 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562541976 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562540899 ## src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/JwksServer.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +package org.apache.geronimo.microprofile.impl.jwtauth.j

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

rmannibucau commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562539969 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1562525740 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

rmannibucau commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1559090214 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1558978643 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

rmannibucau commented on code in PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#discussion_r1557913665 ## src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/jwt/KidMapper.java: ## @@ -79,9 +101,48 @@ private void init() {

Re: [PR] Add support for JWKS from remote location [geronimo-jwt-auth]

ArneLimburg commented on PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/7#issuecomment-2045317784 @rmannibucau Would you mind to take another look and merge, if ok? Maybe directly doing a release? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.9 release

+1 (binding) On 07/04/2024 17:39, fpapon wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.9 release to your vote. We fixed 1 issue: - [GERONIMO-6859] - Enable to use .zip from graal-ce for windows Staging Maven repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachege

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.9 release

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 5:39 PM fpapon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.9 release to your vote. > > We fixed 1 issue: > > - [GERONIMO-6859] - Enable to use .zip from graal-ce for windows > > Staging Maven repository: > https://repository.apac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.9 release

+1 and thanks a lot François side note for voters: knights can be broken on very recent graalvm (java 21+) due to a breaking change in svm sdk, we can move to the new one on next (1.1?) -> TBD on the list probably but take it into consideration during testing please. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibuc

Re: Arthur release

all fine, go on! txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 05.04.2024 um 09:30 schrieb Francois Papon : > > Hi all, > > I would like to start the release process for Arthur, any objection? > > regards, > > François >

Re: Arthur release

No problem for me. Regards JB On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:30 AM Francois Papon wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to start the release process for Arthur, any objection? > > regards, > > François >

Re: Arthur release

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-345] Upgrade ASM from 9.6 to 9.7 [geronimo-xbean]

panbingkun commented on PR #40: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/40#issuecomment-2033878080 > > @rmannibucau Thank you very much! Please don't mind, I would like to ask if there is a `release date` for our new version based on `ASM 9.7`? > > Hi @panbingkun I will try

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-345] Upgrade ASM from 9.6 to 9.7 [geronimo-xbean]

fpapon commented on PR #40: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/40#issuecomment-2033805117 > @rmannibucau Thank you very much! Please don't mind, I would like to ask if there is a `release date` for our new version based on `ASM 9.7`? Hi @panbingkun I will try to ru

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-345] Upgrade ASM from 9.6 to 9.7 [geronimo-xbean]

panbingkun commented on PR #40: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/40#issuecomment-2033784164 @rmannibucau Thank you very much! Please don't mind, I would like to ask if there is a `release date` for our new version based on `ASM 9.7`? -- This is an automated message fr

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-345] Upgrade ASM from 9.6 to 9.7 [geronimo-xbean]

panbingkun commented on PR #40: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/40#issuecomment-2033702999 https://asm.ow2.io/versions.html https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/assets/15246973/533bd4ba-4c50-44c3-b910-5f5cd9ce01e6";> -- This is an automated message from the Ap

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-345] Upgrade ASM from 9.6 to 9.7 [geronimo-xbean]

rmannibucau merged PR #40: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/40 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronim

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-345] Upgrade ASM from 9.6 to 9.7 [geronimo-xbean]

panbingkun commented on PR #40: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/40#issuecomment-2033702017 cc @rmannibucau @fpapon -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] [XBEAN-345] Upgrade ASM from 9.6 to 9.7 [geronimo-xbean]

panbingkun commented on PR #40: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/40#issuecomment-2033700473 `mvn clean install` with JDK1.8 https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/assets/15246973/5994c3f7-c93d-4564-998a-2fc6189db827";> -- This is an automated message from the Apa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4

+1 binding Thanks Le dim. 24 mars 2024, 17:35, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > Le ven. 22 mars 2024 à 21:40, fpapon a écrit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4 release to your vote. >> >> Release Notes: >> >> * [BATCHEE-169] -

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4

+1 (binding) Regards JB Le ven. 22 mars 2024 à 21:40, fpapon a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4 release to your vote. > > Release Notes: > > * [BATCHEE-169] - Apache Parent POM 31 > * [BATCHEE-170] - Jackson 2.17.0 > * [BATCHEE-171] - Johnzon 1.2.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4

+1 (binding) François On 22/03/2024 21:40, fpapon wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4 release to your vote. Release Notes:     * [BATCHEE-169] - Apache Parent POM 31     * [BATCHEE-170] - Jackson 2.17.0     * [BATCHEE-171] - Johnzon 1.2.21     * [BATCHEE-172] - TomEE 8

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4

+1 (non binding), thx! (staging repo works now) Am Samstag, dem 23.03.2024 um 20:07 +0100 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: > +1, thanks François. > > @rzo1 can you give it another try? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le sam. 23 mars 2024 à

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4

+1, thanks François. @rzo1 can you give it another try? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4

Hi François, can you close the repo? 404 - Repository "orgapachebatchee-1011 (staging: open)" [id=orgapachebatchee-1011] exists but is not exposed. Repository "orgapachebatchee-1011 (staging: open)" [id=orgapachebatchee-1011] exists but is not exposed. Gruß Richard Am Freitag, dem 22.03.2024 um

Re: [PR] [build] Set apache-release profile on maven-release-plugin [geronimo-batchee]

fpapon merged PR #25: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/25 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.a

Re: [PR] Changes for BatchEE 1.0.4 [geronimo-batchee]

rmannibucau merged PR #24: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/24 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geron

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

rmannibucau commented on PR #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23#issuecomment-2013521893 > But its not a required or transitiv dependency? Not nice then but also no problem, right? > Or what exactly is the distro? A zip with both openejb and batchee jars? Ye

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

tandraschko commented on PR #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23#issuecomment-2013513532 But its not a required or transitiv dependency? Not nice then but also no problem, right? Or what exactly is the distro? A zip with both openejb and batchee jars? -- This is

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

rmannibucau commented on PR #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23#issuecomment-2013496747 @tandraschko we deliver an openejb distro (for the old like me we don't care of tom(ee) part but only openejb to enable to run EE batches) -- This is an automated message from

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

tandraschko commented on PR #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23#issuecomment-2013478059 I dont understand the discussion? We need a non-snapshot dependency for the release, and its a chicken egg problem. Does batchee shade something from TomEE? -- This is an au

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

rmannibucau commented on PR #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23#issuecomment-2013400675 ok so we aim at using v10 to avoid multiple breakages in the jakarta land as much as we can (we know 9 -> 10 will break cdi users for ex) -- This is an automated message from t

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 commented on PR #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23#issuecomment-2013129677 TomEE 9.1 uses the (reference) Jakarta API artifacts (no relocations) for EE 9.1 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

rzo1 commented on PR #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23#issuecomment-2013127751 Yes, TomEE 9.1 is EE9.1. BatchEE 2.0.0 targets EE10 and has the CDI 4 changes. But for TomEE 10 Milestone, we need BatchEE 🙃 so hen egg kind of thing. -- This is an a

Re: [PR] Try latest TomEE version for release build [geronimo-batchee]

rmannibucau commented on PR #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/23#issuecomment-2013109477 TomEE 9.1 is jakarta 9.1 right? So javax API just relocated (means not jakarta API) so will be breaking when we'll move to v10. Ultimately I'd prefer TomEE 10.0.0 with batchee

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >