[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
-David
On Sep 6, 2005, at 9:33 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok ...I am hijacking this thread... enough discussion...lets vote
on it...
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[ ] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on __
For me:
[X] Friday 9/9 is
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:33 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok ...I am hijacking this thread... enough discussion...lets vote
on it...
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
-dain
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:33 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/7/05, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61Ehttp://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
BTW, in the future, please start a vote on a new email thread.
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
Can you shine a little light on why? Was there something missed that
you want to get in there?
BTW, in the future, please start a vot
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 9/7/2005 10:06 AM:
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
Can you shine a little light on why? Was there something missed that
you want to get in
I'm not a committer but I'd like to add my backing for 9/9 QA cut.
I think we have to keep produce regular milestones/releases to keep the
momentum.
:
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
--
Joe Bohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he ca
[X] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
Jacek
I think we've made significant progress in the last week towards being
ready to make the branch for M5, but I think there may be reasons to
wait a couple more days. There are 2 features that people want to get
in (security improvements and DDL generation) that I would like to see
in M5, and mo
On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:39 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I think we've made significant progress in the last week towards
being ready to make the branch for M5, but I think there may be
reasons to wait a couple more days. There are 2 features that
people want to get in (security improvements and D
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:39 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I think we've made significant progress in the last week towards
being ready to make the branch for M5, but I think there may be
reasons to wait a couple more days. There are 2 features that
people want to get in
On 9/9/2005 4:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I've taken a look at both solutions for the openejb ASN1 usage. The
ASN1 bouncy castle code is realatively selfcontained, and can be
separated out an repackaged relatively quickly. I've already managed
to build a version of the BC code that contains j
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
I have been disturbed over the last two weeks. However, the DDL creation Ant
task that I have been working on is nearly done (integration tests being
implemented). I would like to check it in over
So, where do we think we are today?
geir
On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:39 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I think we've made significant progress in the last week towards
being ready to make the branch for M5, but I think there may be
reasons to wait a couple more days. There are 2 features that
people w
I think today will be it ;-)
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
So, where do we think we are today?
geir
On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:39 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I think we've made significant progress in the last week towards
being ready to make the branch for M5, but I think there may be
reasons to wait
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
So, where do we think we are today?
Closer but that there are still regressions that need to be fixed and
there is no point in fixing them twice.
--
Jeremy
I thought we were going to cut on 9/16
On 9/12/2005 4:15 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I think today will be it ;-)
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
So, where do we think we are today?
geir
On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:39 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I think we've made significant progress in the last week toward
The count was :
9/9 : Jacek, Joe (non committer), Bruce, Geir, Dain, David B, Jeff
9/16 : Alan, Gianny,
with David J then suggesting on friday (9/9) that given the state of
things, we wait until monday (today, 9/12) and re-evaluate.
It seems like we're making great progress, but still not th
Ok...9/16 then...but this is now 4 days warning. 9/16 needs to be it
(yes I know...someone needs to be the bad cop). ;-)
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The count was :
9/9 : Jacek, Joe (non committer), Bruce, Geir, Dain, David B, Jeff
9/16 : Alan, Gianny,
with David J then suggesting on friday (9
20 matches
Mail list logo
