-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 12:01 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please try out the upgrade jar
On Jun 1, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Song Scorpio wrote:
I just tried the new upgrade.jar within server runtime,
context-priority-classloader element
For an application which is using datasource, we should manually add dependency to deployment plan upgraded by the tool.The plan upgraded by the tool is following:
- web-app xmlns
=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-1.0 xmlns:naming
=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.1 xmlns:sec=
How old is the upgrade.jar you are using?
Noticed that your generated plan still has the old
context-priority-classloader element in it.
-Donald
Zhang Song wrote:
For an application which is using datasource, we should manually add
dependency to deployment plan upgraded by the tool.
I just tried the new upgrade.jar within server runtime, context-priority-classloader element is gone. But there's still no datasource dependency, which will cause failure of application deployment..
2006/6/2, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How old is the upgrade.jar you are using?Noticed that
On Jun 1, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Song Scorpio wrote:I just tried the new upgrade.jar within server runtime, context-priority-classloader element is gone. But there's still no datasource dependency, which will cause failure of application deployment..Do you think the upgrade tool should insert comments
)
I also tried to execute deploy.bat start geronimo/upgrade/1.1-SNAPSHOT/car
before it, but it didn't make any difference.
Thanks,
Lin
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 1:36 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please try
it, but it didn't make any difference.
Thanks,
Lin
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 1:36 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please try out the upgrade jar
Toby,
Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed it in 1.1
Thanks, that worked very well!
-Original Message-
From: Donald Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 4:48 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please try out the upgrade jar
E:\geronimo-1.1-SNAPSHOT\binjava -jar upgrade.jar
Parameter usage:
inputPlan
Toby,
Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed it in 1.1, will port to
trunk soon. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2068
thanks
david jencks
On May 26, 2006, at 3:29 PM, toby cabot wrote:
David,
Thanks for providing this tool, it's a big help. I had some problems
on a
David,
Thanks for providing this tool, it's a big help. I had some problems
on a test geronimo-application.xml file that includes some gbean
references (for hooking up to security gbeans). The file looks like:
=
?xml version=1.0 ?
application
On 5/12/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I think you (or someone) mentioned earlier that it might be
useful to make this utility available from the admin console. Seems
like one reasonable approach would be to enable the current
application deployment portlet to detect when a
I've also noticed another difference between the 1.0 and 1.1 deployment
plans.
Concerning the following xml:
security-realm-namegeronimo-properties-realm/security-realm-name
security
default-principal
principal name=anonymous
Hi David J.,
This is very helpful! So far it worked for the simple
ejb, war, ear that I've tested. I'll let you know if I
ran into problems deploying other modules.
Dave Colasurdo,
FYI, I tried upgrading my geronimo-web.xml and it was
converted from:
web-app
Thanks for trying it out. I changed how it starts quite a bit today
-- I hope it hasn't become too slow.
I also think I fixed the schema issue Dave Colasurdo found.
thanks
david jencks
On May 14, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Chris Cardona wrote:
Hi David J.,
This is very helpful! So far it worked
Thanks David! It seems to run fine on the simple plans that I have
tried though I do have a few quick comments and observations..
1) Should the version in the schema name be updated (from 1.0 - 1.1)
for both jetty and tomcat plans? For example, the following line is
unchanged when the tool
15 matches
Mail list logo