Re: release geronimo-interceptor-1.2.0 ?

Hi wondered about a release train? was thinking about jcdi 1.1, interceptor, json, and few others. Main question is: can we test signatures or do we miss some tck parts? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in

release geronimo-interceptor-1.2.0 ?

Hi! I'd say geronimo-interceptor-1.2.0 is pretty much ready. We test it as part of the BVal and CDI TCK. BVal-1.1 passes the TCK already and OpenWebBeans only has a few failing tests which are imo not interceptor related. Any problem if I start with the release? LieGrue, strub

Re: release geronimo-jcdi-1.1-alpha-1?

we need to check shouldn't be that long, always weird to get alpha for "spcificed" APIs as a user. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014/1/13 Mark Struberg : > >

Re: release geronimo-jcdi-1.1-alpha-1?

>Btw alpha or not? Not sure it is relevant for spec jars without much logic Does it pass the TCK already? If so we can go final. Otherwise I fear we need to ship an alpha. LieGrue, strub On Friday, 10 January 2014, 20:37, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: +1, iirc bval should need it too >Btw al

Re: release geronimo-jcdi-1.1-alpha-1?

+1, iirc bval should need it too Btw alpha or not? Not sure it is relevant for spec jars without much logic Le 10 janv. 2014 19:28, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > Hi! > > I'd like to ship an alpha version of the CDI-1.1 api jar. > > We need this for TomEE, BatchEE and of course for OpenWebBeans. >

release geronimo-jcdi-1.1-alpha-1?

Hi! I'd like to ship an alpha version of the CDI-1.1 api jar. We need this for TomEE, BatchEE and of course for OpenWebBeans. wdyt? Imo it's pretty much ready already. LieGrue, strub

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

Closing this vote with 6 +1 votes (3 bindings). Thx to the reviewers, I'll promote this release now. Cheers, Guillaume 2013/11/27 Guillaume Nodet > I've uploaded a release at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ > to fix the foll

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

Hi! The VOTE has passed with the following +1 Mark Struberg, Romain Manni-Bucau (non-binding), Alan Cabrera, JL Monteiro (non-binding), David Blevins, Kevin Sutter (non-binding) +0 none -1 none Thanks all for reviewing and voting! I'll gonna propagate the stuff to our release repos. Li

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch > TCK. > > > > The staging repo is > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/ > > > > The source release is here > > > https://repository.apache

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/ > > The source release is here > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

s now. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > -- > *From:* Mark Struberg > *To:* geronimo-dev > *Sent:* Monday, 25 November 2013, 16:53 > *Subject:* [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0 > > Good evening! > > I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

+1 Jarek On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I've uploaded a release at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ > to fix the following issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6509 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

+1 I think we're still a bit short of binding votes ... 2013/11/27 Guillaume Nodet > I've uploaded a release at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ > to fix the following issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

+1 thanks ! On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I've uploaded a release at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ > to fix the following issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6509 > &

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

> > From: Mark Struberg >To: geronimo-dev >Sent: Monday, 25 November 2013, 16:53 >Subject: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0 > > > >Good evening! > > >I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API. > > > >The API is already

Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

+1 LieGrue, strub > > From: Ivan >To: dev@geronimo.apache.org >Sent: Friday, 29 November 2013, 4:18 >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2 > > > >+1, Thanks Guillaume for helping this. > > > > >2013/1

Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

1:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet > wrote: > > I've uploaded a release at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ > to fix the following issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6509 > > Please review and vote, > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

+1 (non-binding) This is a big problem as underlying causes (like IOExceptions and such) are lost which makes various issues hard to debug and resolve. Dan On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I've uploaded a release at > https://repository.apache.

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

Mark Struberg wrote: > > > > Good evening! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API. > > > > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch > TCK. > > > > The staging repo is > > > h

[VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

I've uploaded a release at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ to fix the following issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6509 Please review and vote, Cheers, Guillaume

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK. > > The staging repo is > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/ > > The source release is here > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/o

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

e staging repo is > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/ > > The source release is here > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-rele

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

//fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg : >>>> Good evening! >>>> >>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

you built it against java 7 where the spec > >> >> says > >> >> > >> >> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It > >> >> requires Java 6 or higher. " > >> >> > >> >> Not su

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

not. >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

bucau.wordpress.com/ > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >> > >> > >> > >> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg : > >> > Good evening! > >> > > >> > I'd li

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

s://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg : >> > Good evening! >> > >> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API. >> > >> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and p

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

t; > > > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch > TCK. > > > > The staging repo is > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/ > > > > The source release is here > > > ht

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

nimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg >> > Cc: >> > Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01 >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0 >> > >> > Hi Mark, >> > >> > "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 wh

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

Mark Struberg > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01 > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0 > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec > says > > > > "This

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

Hi! But target is 1.6, so it should run fine on jdk-1.6, right? LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Romain Manni-Bucau > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

JSR-352 JBatch TCK. > > The staging repo is > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/ > > The source release is here > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/ge

[VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

Good evening! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API. The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK. The staging repo is https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/ The source release is here

Re: release spec jars

should be fine now (@Deprecated was missing on addNode in ConstraintValidatorContext): ·> java -jar sigtestdev.jar Test -Classpath $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/rt.jar:/home/a185558/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-validation_1.1_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-validation_1.1_spec-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ja

Re: release spec jars

** missed few commit to pass, I'll push them in the morning Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2013/11/22 Romain Manni-Bucau : > bval spec jar passed tck + sig tes

Re: release spec jars

bval spec jar passed tck + sig test (checked few minutes ago)

Re: release spec jars

We can release specs which have passed the TCK. I can confirm this for the jbatch-api. geronimo-el-2.2 should also be fine as it's part of tomcat7, TomEE, etc what else? Does BVAL-1.1 already pass the TCK? All other spec apis need to be released with an -alpha1 version for example

release spec jars

Hi Anyone to release spec jars? basically these one would be great: geronimo-el_2.2_spec:1.0.5 geronimo-validation_1.1_spec:1.0 geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec:1.0 geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec:1.0 geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec:1.0.MR2 geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec:1.0 The last one for batchee of course and

[RESULT] [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

Closing this vote with 6 +1s (4 bindings) and no other votes. I'll publish the binaries asap. Thx to everyone for voting. 2013/11/13 Guillaume Nodet > I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. > The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata > pr

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

+1 Regards, Alan On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. > The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata problems. > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-258 > >

Re: [DISCUSS] release geronimo_specs-jbatch-1.0.jar?

+1, would be great to release batchee soon so we need it Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2013/11/19 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > The Apache BatchE

[DISCUSS] release geronimo_specs-jbatch-1.0.jar?

Hi folks! The Apache BatchEE project would need the spec jar of JBatch. We do already pass the JSR-352 TCK, so the api should be fine. Any problems if I roll a release for this module? LieGrue, strub

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

+1 Jarek On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. > The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata > problems. > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-258 > &

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

+1 2013/11/13 Guillaume Nodet > I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. > The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata > problems. > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-258 > > Binaries: > > https://repository.ap

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

+1 LieGrue, strub > > From: Guillaume Nodet >To: dev@geronimo.apache.org >Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2013, 23:14 >Subject: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release > > > >I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. >The 3.15 of l

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

+1 Le 14 nov. 2013 06:29, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" a écrit : > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 11/13/2013 11:14 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. >> The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 11/13/2013 11:14 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata problems. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-258 Binaries: https://repository.apach

[VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata problems. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-258 Binaries: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-130/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/

[RESULTS] XBean 3.15 release

Ok. Here's my +1. Vote passes with 8 +1s and no other votes: David Blevins Alan Cabrera Romain Manni-Bucau Dain Sundstrom Hiram Chirino Jean-Louis Monteiro Jarek Gawor Mark Struberg -David On Nov 6, 2013, at 8:55 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, release rolled! > > Binari

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: David Blevins > To: "dev@geronimo.apache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 5:55 > Subject: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release > > Ok, release rolled! > > Binaries: > > https:/

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 Jarek On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:55 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, release rolled! > > Binaries: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/ > > Tag: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.15

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 thanks 2013/11/8 Hiram Chirino > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:55 PM, David Blevins > wrote: > > Ok, release rolled! > > > > Binaries: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/ > > > > Ta

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:55 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, release rolled! > > Binaries: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/ > > Tag: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.15/ > > >

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 -dain

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 Le 7 nov. 2013 07:12, "Alan D. Cabrera" a écrit : > +1 Looks good. > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Nov 6, 2013, at 8:55 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > > Ok, release rolled! > > > > Binaries: > > > > > https://repository

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 Looks good. Regards, Alan On Nov 6, 2013, at 8:55 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, release rolled! > > Binaries: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/ > > Tag: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean

[VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

Ok, release rolled! Binaries: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.15/ 72 hours for voting! :) -David

Re: XBean 3.15 release?

go on! will cast a vote after testing. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: David Blevins > To: "dev@geronimo.apache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:15 > Subject: XBean 3.15 release? > > Anyone object if I roll an XBean 3.1.5 release? > > > -David >

Re: XBean 3.15 release?

écrit : > >> Anyone object if I roll an XBean 3.1.5 release? >> >> >> -David >> >

Re: XBean 3.15 release?

Go ahead and thanks Le 4 nov. 2013 03:21, "David Blevins" a écrit : > Anyone object if I roll an XBean 3.1.5 release? > > > -David > >

Re: XBean 3.15 release?

+1 Regards, Alan On Nov 3, 2013, at 6:15 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Anyone object if I roll an XBean 3.1.5 release? > > > -David >

XBean 3.15 release?

Anyone object if I roll an XBean 3.1.5 release? -David

Re: xbean release?

7:28 >Subject: RE: xbean release? > > > >I think you have the wrong person. >  >Stephen Hodges >___ >EMC Global Professional Services >Application Architecture, Design and Development >Phone: 334.796.1724 >[hidden email] >  >From:Romain Mann

RE: xbean release?

l-node+s328035n3987305...@n3.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:17 PM To: Hodges, Stephen Subject: xbean release? Hi Is it possible to release xbean 3.15? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github:

xbean release?

Hi Is it possible to release xbean 3.15? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo 3.0.1

I think there used to be a profile that you were supposed to use when running the release plugin -- at least release:prepare-- that would include all the modules, not just the ones you normally build, so all the versions would get updated properly. david jencks On May 20, 2013, at 6:30 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo 3.0.1

Just modify the pom.xml: Change: 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT to 3.0.1 mvn clean install, and you're good to go! -- View this message in context: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Release-Geronimo-3-0-1-tp3986750p3987176.html Sent from the Development mailing

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811) Make GEP 3.0.1 release

. > Make GEP 3.0.1 release > -- > > Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811 > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811 > Project: Geronimo-Devtools > Issue Type: Task >

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] take2 - release xbean-3.14

Mark with this? Or better yet, Mark do you not > have karma to do the JIRA cleanup? We can get that fixed... > I've Added a new version 3.15 for XBean project, and mark XBean 3.14 released on June 2, 2013 in JIRA system. > > As release manager, better for you to send the announce email… > > --kevan -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811) Make GEP 3.0.1 release

.0.1 release to dist.apache.org/repos/dist at revision 2116 > Make GEP 3.0.1 release > -- > > Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811 > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811 > P

[VOTE PASS] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

+1 vote: Forrest, Jarek, Shawn, Kevan no +0 or -1 vote. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Second try to release GEP 3.0.1. It fixed the build problem on Mac OS. > > Please vote Geronimo eclipse plugin(GEP) 3.0.1 release. This is a release > a

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] take2 - release xbean-3.14

ts. > Kevan, can you please again take over the task of cleaning up JIRA and do the > 'official' stuff like the ANN mail? Anybody else able to help Mark with this? Or better yet, Mark do you not have karma to do the JIRA cleanup? We can get that fixed... As release manager, better for you to send the announce email… --kevan

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] take2 - release xbean-3.14

ff like the ANN mail? txs and LIeGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Mark Struberg > To: geronimo-dev > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2013, 9:03 > Subject: [VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14 > > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for rel

Re: [VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14

txs Kevan. This file gets generated during the maven release process. Will add this to the exclude list. And here is my +1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Kevan Miller > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 30 May

AW: Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

apache-rat:check -- Alan Cabrera schrieb am Do., 30. Mai 2013 17:51 MESZ: >How are you guys able to get a clean rat:check? > > >Regards, >Alan > >On May 29, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> Sec

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

How are you guys able to get a clean rat:check? Regards, Alan On May 29, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Second try to release GEP 3.0.1. It fixed the build problem on Mac OS. > > Please vote Geronimo eclipse plugin(GEP) 3.0.1 release. This is a releas

Re: [VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14

How are you guys able to get a clean rat:check? Regards, Alan On May 30, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for releasing xbean-3.14. > This time I fixed the missing license headers and activated RAT for each > build. > > > The staging repo can

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

clean install --kevan On May 29, 2013, at 4:31 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Second try to release GEP 3.0.1. It fixed the build problem on Mac OS. > > Please vote Geronimo eclipse plugin(GEP) 3.0.1 release. This is a release > along with Geronimo server runtime release 3

Re: [VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14

+1 Jarek On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for releasing xbean-3.14. > This time I fixed the missing license headers and activated RAT for each > build. > > > The staging repo can be found here: > https://repository.apache.org/content

Re: [VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14

T. I'm ok with or without fixing this DEPENDENCIES issue (as long as it's fixed for future releases). So, here's my +1 for release. --kevan On May 30, 2013, at 3:03 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for releasing xbean-3.1

Re: [VOTE PASS] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

Forrest, by my count this vote was open just a bit more than 24 hours. The norm is a minimum of 72 hours. There are times when expedited release votes can be used, but not without discussion. I notice that there is not an actual source archive that is buildable. The references sources jar only

Re: [VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14

+1 *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/5/30 Forrest Xia > +1 looks good f

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

any more vote? On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > +1 > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> Second try to release GEP 3.0.1. It fixed the build problem on Mac OS. >> >> Please vote Geronimo

Re: [VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14

+1 looks good for me, thanks! On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for releasing xbean-3.14. > This time I fixed the missing license headers and activated RAT for each > build. > > > The staging repo can be found here: > https://repositor

[VOTE PASS] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

;>> To make Geronimo eclipse plugin compiled on Mac OS, we need to release a >>> new maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2. >>> >>> Here are artifacts for vote: >>> Source code: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

+1 2013/5/30 Shawn Jiang > +1 > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> To make Geronimo eclipse plugin compiled on Mac OS, we need to release a >> new maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2. >> >> Here

[VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14

Hi! I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for releasing xbean-3.14. This time I fixed the missing license headers and activated RAT for each build. The staging repo can be found here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-038/ The tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ge

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

+1 On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi all, > > To make Geronimo eclipse plugin compiled on Mac OS, we need to release a > new maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2. > > Here are artifacts for vote: > Source code: > > https://repository.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

+1 On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Second try to release GEP 3.0.1. It fixed the build problem on Mac OS. > > Please vote Geronimo eclipse plugin(GEP) 3.0.1 release. This is a release > along with Geronimo server runtime release 3.0.1. &g

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

+1, thanks Forrest. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > +1 Looks good to me. Thank you! > > Jarek > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > To make Geronimo eclipse plugin compiled on Mac OS, we need to rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

: > Hi Devs, > > Second try to release GEP 3.0.1. It fixed the build problem on Mac OS. > > Please vote Geronimo eclipse plugin(GEP) 3.0.1 release. This is a release > along with Geronimo server runtime release 3.0.1. > > For details, see > http://people.apache.org/buil

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

+1 Looks good to me. Thank you! Jarek On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi all, > > To make Geronimo eclipse plugin compiled on Mac OS, we need to release a new > maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2. > > Here are artifacts for vote: > Source code: > https

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

+1 myself On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Second try to release GEP 3.0.1. It fixed the build problem on Mac OS. > > Please vote Geronimo eclipse plugin(GEP) 3.0.1 release. This is a release > along with Geronimo server runtime release 3.0.

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

+1 myself On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi all, > > To make Geronimo eclipse plugin compiled on Mac OS, we need to release a > new maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2. > > Here are artifacts for vote: > Source code: > > https://repository.apac

[VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1 - second try

Hi Devs, Second try to release GEP 3.0.1. It fixed the build problem on Mac OS. Please vote Geronimo eclipse plugin(GEP) 3.0.1 release. This is a release along with Geronimo server runtime release 3.0.1. For details, see http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/eclipse/updates/PLUGIN_RELEASE

[VOTE] Geronimo devtools maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2 release

Hi all, To make Geronimo eclipse plugin compiled on Mac OS, we need to release a new maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.2. Here are artifacts for vote: Source code: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/org/apache/geronimo/devtools/maven-eclipsepde-plugin/1.2/maven

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release xbean-3.14

txs for the catch Kevan! Is there no automatic RAT/creadur enabled in the build? LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Kevan Miller > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 28 May 2013, 20:58 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release xbean-3.

Re: [VOTE] release xbean-3.14

Hi Mark, I'm seeing a few problems. Looks like I may have missed them in the last release. Anyway, I think they need to be fixed. My bad for not seeing sooner... Missing an Apache source license header: xbean-finder/src/test/java/org/apache/xbean/finder/ClassAnnotationFinderTest.java

[VOTE] release xbean-3.14

Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing xbean-3.14 The staging repo can be found here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ The tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.14/ And here comes the source.zip: https://repository.apa

Cancelled [VOTE] Release Geronimo eclipse plugin 3.0.1

need to release maven eclipsepde plugin 1.2 first, so that GEP 3.x can build on Mac. On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Please vote Geronimo eclipse plugin(GEP) 3.0.1 release. This is a release > along with Geronimo server runtime release 3.0.1. >

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >