Re: SLF4J over Commons Logging

2008-04-24 Thread Jason Dillon
Took way too long at the airport, so punting commit until tomorrow when I'm awake again. --jason On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:18 AM, David Jencks wrote: +higher than I can count :-) thanks david jencks On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Yo yo... we've talked about this before, tho

Re: SLF4J over Commons Logging

2008-04-24 Thread Jason Dillon
Aight... well, ~9 hours later, I think its working or at 99% I need to re-add support for the org.apache.geronimo.log.ConsoleLogLevel property, perhaps even add a special bootstrap SLF4J impl, but I think that the work is almost ready to commit. Re-building to see how the testsuite fairs w

Re: SLF4J over Commons Logging

2008-04-24 Thread Dan Becker
Jason Dillon wrote: Yo yo... we've talked about this before, though a while ago... but IMO its about time we drop Commons Logging like a rock and move over to SLF4J. +1 Lots of useful features in SLF4J. It performs well in the cases when you are not logging. -- Thanks, Dan Becker

Re: SLF4J over Commons Logging

2008-04-24 Thread Jason Dillon
And testing now :-) --jason On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:18 AM, David Jencks wrote: +higher than I can count :-) thanks david jencks On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Yo yo... we've talked about this before, though a while ago... but IMO its about time we drop Commons Logging lik

Re: SLF4J over Commons Logging

2008-04-24 Thread Jason Dillon
Almost done ;-) --jason On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:18 AM, David Jencks wrote: +higher than I can count :-) thanks david jencks On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Yo yo... we've talked about this before, though a while ago... but IMO its about time we drop Commons Logging like a

Re: SLF4J over Commons Logging

2008-04-23 Thread David Jencks
+higher than I can count :-) thanks david jencks On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Yo yo... we've talked about this before, though a while ago... but IMO its about time we drop Commons Logging like a rock and move over to SLF4J. The API is mostly the same, though SLF4J has

Re: SLF4J over Commons Logging

2008-04-23 Thread Donald Woods
+1 -Donald Jason Dillon wrote: Yo yo... we've talked about this before, though a while ago... but IMO its about time we drop Commons Logging like a rock and move over to SLF4J. The API is mostly the same, though SLF4J has native support for things like: log.trace() And has additional

SLF4J over Commons Logging

2008-04-23 Thread Jason Dillon
Yo yo... we've talked about this before, though a while ago... but IMO its about time we drop Commons Logging like a rock and move over to SLF4J. The API is mostly the same, though SLF4J has native support for things like: log.trace() And has additional varargs support for things lik